한국에서 성소수자의 법적 지위의 변화와 전망
A Study on the legal status of sexual-minorities and its prospect in the Republic of Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper summarized the case of the Court and the Constitutional Court regarding sexual-minorities. Social tolerance toward sexual-minorities - homosexuality, transgender, intersexualities etc - has advanced significantly. As a result, for nearly 10 years, many changes had the legal status of sexual-minorities in Korea. In the case of 2007 X-zon, the Supreme Court ruled that homosexuality itself is obscene. but In the case of 2013 movie ‘Just Friends?’, the Supreme Court found that the representation of homosexuality was not necessarily obscene in and of itself. On the one hand, the Constitutional Court has upheld the old article 92 of the Military Criminal Law, agreed homosexual conduct in the military is crime, is constitutional. Some critics of this decision argue that the Constitutional Court should have protected the fundamental right of sexual-minorities. The Court has conversion of recognition about transgender. After 2006 case, the Court has approval of th change of sex on the record in the family registration system. and the Supreme Court Convicts man for raping transgender woman. Even though these changes, legal issues, homosexual marriage, family configuration, social security, homophobia, transphobia, are remain in Korea.
Abstract
This paper summarized the case of the Court and the Constitutional Court regarding sexual-minorities. Social tolerance toward sexual-minorities - homosexuality, transgender, intersexualities etc - has advanced significantly. As a result, for nearly 10 years, many changes had the legal status of sexual-minorities in Korea. In the case of 2007 X-zon, the Supreme Court ruled that homosexuality itself is obscene. but In the case of 2013 movie ‘Just Friends?’, the Supreme Court found that the representation of homosexuality was not necessarily obscene in and of itself. On the one hand, the Constitutional Court has upheld the old article 92 of the Military Criminal Law, agreed homosexual conduct in the military is crime, is constitutional. Some critics of this decision argue that the Constitutional Court should have protected the fundamental right of sexual-minorities. The Court has conversion of recognition about transgender. After 2006 case, the Court has approval of th change of sex on the record in the family registration system. and the Supreme Court Convicts man for raping transgender woman. Even though these changes, legal issues, homosexual marriage, family configuration, social security, homophobia, transphobia, are remain in Korea.
참고문헌 (16)
- 姜達天, "同性愛者의 權利保護", 법제연구, (23), pp.83~104 (2002), 한국법제연구원
- 김명수, "성적 소수자의 법적 차별에 관한 고찰 ― 군형법 제92조에 관한 헌법재판소의 결정을 중심으로 ―", 세계헌법연구, 18(1), pp.59~89 (2012), 세계헌법학회한국학회[DOI]
- 김중권, "성전환자의 성별정정허가신청사건 등 사무처리지침’의 문제점", 법률신문 연구논단, (3493) (2006)
- 한국의 LGBTI 인권현황 2013, 성저지향․성별정체성 법정책연구회 연간보고서, "성적지향․성별정체성 법정책연구회", 성적지향․성별정체성 법정책연구회, ~ (2013)
- 윤진수, "性別訂正 許可가 있기 전의 性轉換者의 法的 地位 —대상판결: 대법원 2009.9.10.선고 2009도3580 판결—", 가족법연구, 23(3), pp.239~262 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 이경환, "군형법 제92조 6의 문제점과 법적 쟁점, 제4회 SOGI콜로키움 군형법과 동성애", 군형법 제92조 6을 둘러싼 동성애 담론과 성소수자의 시민권, 자료집 (2014)
- 이승현, "성전환자의 법적 지위에 대한 국내 논의 동향 및 제언", 법과 사회, (44) (2013)
- 이준일, "트랜스젠더(transgender)의 헌법적 문제", 고려법학, (50), pp.39~75 (2008), 법학연구원
- 이호중, "군형법 제92조의5 추행죄의 위헌성과 폐지론", 형사법연구, 23(1), pp.229~264 (2011), 한국형사법학회
- 장서연, "성소수자의 법적 쟁점과 과제", 인권법평론, (4) (2009), 전남대 공익인권법센터
- 전영평, "한국의 소수자운동과 인권정책" (2011), 집문당
- 정연주, "군형법상 추행죄의 헌법적 문제", 공법학연구, 12(2), pp.133~158 (2011), 한국비교공법학회
- 정인섭, "서울대학교 법학연구소 법의지배센터연구시리즈, 2004-2" (2004), 박영사
- 최성경, "성전환자의 성별정정 허가기준과 그 입법적 제안 — 대상결정: 대법원ᅠ2011.9.2.자 2009스117 전원합의체결정 —", 가족법연구, 27(1), pp.373~412 (2013), 한국가족법학회
- 현소혜, "성전환자의 민사상 법적 지위", 가족법연구, 16(2), pp.10~347 (2002), 한국가족법학회
- 한수웅, "헌법학" (2014), 법문사
