콘텐츠산업 진흥법상 콘텐츠분쟁조정위원회 조정제도의 문제점과 그 개선방안
The mediation system problems and the ways to improve The Content Dispute Resolution Committee that is provided in the Contents Industry Promotion Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Content Dispute Resolution Committee(we call it as “CDRC”) of the Republic of Korea has provided so special and fast dispute resolution supporting service in the contents industry domain so that has a big role to make healthy and fair contents market environment. CDRC started 3 years ago and has received about 12,000 cases and it has made parties to get about 6,000 agreements. And the CDRC performed 205 successful resolution cases through 200 mediation meetings. But the system’s problems were exposed through 3 years operation time and these problems should be improved by the amendment of Contents Industry Promotion Act. CDRC should enlarge the notion of content disputes and make legal basis of various ADR methods likewise conciliation, mediation and arbitration. The principal of Party Autonomy must be observed in mediation process. If one party do not want to keep mediation process, the process will be finished. CDRC should not force parties to join in mediation against their’s will. And CDRC needs the new additional provisions on the suspension of prescription. Nowadays CDRC’s mediation proposal which agreed by parties has same effect like a fix decision by court. But it’s not desirable because it deprives parties of the right of access to courts. And it make people who participate in mediation process very serious so they will be reluctant to join mediation process and it draws leading handicap to hold mediation. I look forward to approve CDRC’s mediation & operation system by amendment of the Contents Industry Promotion Act.
Abstract
The Content Dispute Resolution Committee(we call it as “CDRC”) of the Republic of Korea has provided so special and fast dispute resolution supporting service in the contents industry domain so that has a big role to make healthy and fair contents market environment. CDRC started 3 years ago and has received about 12,000 cases and it has made parties to get about 6,000 agreements. And the CDRC performed 205 successful resolution cases through 200 mediation meetings. But the system’s problems were exposed through 3 years operation time and these problems should be improved by the amendment of Contents Industry Promotion Act. CDRC should enlarge the notion of content disputes and make legal basis of various ADR methods likewise conciliation, mediation and arbitration. The principal of Party Autonomy must be observed in mediation process. If one party do not want to keep mediation process, the process will be finished. CDRC should not force parties to join in mediation against their’s will. And CDRC needs the new additional provisions on the suspension of prescription. Nowadays CDRC’s mediation proposal which agreed by parties has same effect like a fix decision by court. But it’s not desirable because it deprives parties of the right of access to courts. And it make people who participate in mediation process very serious so they will be reluctant to join mediation process and it draws leading handicap to hold mediation. I look forward to approve CDRC’s mediation & operation system by amendment of the Contents Industry Promotion Act.
참고문헌 (16)
- 문화체육관광부, "2011 콘텐츠산업백서" (2012)
- 한국콘텐츠진흥원, "2013 콘텐츠분쟁조정사례집" (2013)
- 문화체육관광부, "2012 콘텐츠산업통계" (2013)
- 정보통신산업진흥원, "2013년 전자문서․전자거래분쟁조정사례집", 2013
- 김상찬, "우리나라 행정형 ADR제도의 활성화 방안", 법학연구, (46), pp.213~234 (2012), 한국법학회[DOI]
- 김상찬, "가사분쟁에 있어서 중재절차 활성화 방안", 법학연구, (49), pp.91~113 (2013), 한국법학회
- 함영주, "우리 법제하 행정형 ADR의 현황과 과제", 계간 언론중재, (2009특집) (2009), 언론중재위원회
- 함영주, "미국 엔터테인먼트산업과 조정· 중재", 문화미디어엔터테인먼트법, 4(1), pp.105~128 (2010), 법학연구원 문화.미디어.엔터테인먼트법연구소
- 전병서, "콘텐츠분쟁조정위원회의 신설", 문화미디어엔터테인먼트법, 5(1), pp.105~124 (2011), 법학연구원 문화.미디어.엔터테인먼트법연구소
- 이동학, "사회통합을 위한 의료분쟁의 조정과 중재", 저스티스, 134(3), pp.443~484 (2013), 한국법학원
- 옥무석, "전자상거래와 ADR", 비교사법, 13(2), pp.1~30 (2006), 한국비교사법학회
- 유병현, "ADR의 발전(發展)과 법원외(法院外) 조정(調停)의 효력(效力)", 법조, 53(6), pp.27~72 (2004), 법조협회
- 윤선희, "ADR에서의 지적재산권분쟁", 중재연구, 13(1), pp.125~167 (2003), 한국중재학회
- 장문철, "Party Autonomy in Korean and U.S Court-Annexed Mediation System", 중재연구, 17(2), pp.125~139 (2007), 한국중재학회
- 김성천, "소비자분쟁조정의 입법론적 고찰", 아주법학, 5(2), pp.87~125 (2011), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 서정일, "조정제도의 통합적 운용방안에 관한 연구", 중재연구, 23(2), pp.37~54 (2013), 한국중재학회
