두경부암 다학제 진료의 도입 양상 및 환자 만족도
Introduction of Multidisciplinary Team Approach for Head and Neck Cancer: Patient Satisfaction
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background and Objectives The head and neck multidisciplinary team (MDT) approachplays a crucial role in bringing together the ideas of various medical professionals. This studyaimed to evaluate the early characteristics of the MDT approach for head and neck cancer andanalyzed patients’ satisfaction. Subjects and Method We analyzed 450 head and neck cancer patients who received MDTcare from August 2014 to June 2022. Patient satisfaction with MDT care was evaluated by selfadministeredquestionnaires consisting of 9 questions. Results Of 450, 298 (66.2%) were male and 152 (33.8%) were female. The mean age was60.8±14.7 year. The most common primary site was the larynx (17.3%), followed by the oralcavity and oropharynx. A total of 726 cases of the MDT approach were performed in 266MDT sessions, and the mean number of patients per MDT session was 2.74. The number ofmedical professionals participating in MDT ranged from a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 9,with a mean of 5.11. The mean running time of MDT meetings per case was 19.51 minutes. The time of the 2nd MDT was significantly shorter than that of the 1st or 3rd MDT. The meanscore was close to very satisfactory in each of the 9 patient satisfaction questions. Conclusion We believe that the MDT approach is feasible and recommend its introductionfor the treatment of head and neck cancer as most patients have shown very high satisfaction. Further studies on the role and efficacy of MDT care for head and neck cancer are necessary.
Abstract
Background and Objectives The head and neck multidisciplinary team (MDT) approachplays a crucial role in bringing together the ideas of various medical professionals. This studyaimed to evaluate the early characteristics of the MDT approach for head and neck cancer andanalyzed patients’ satisfaction. Subjects and Method We analyzed 450 head and neck cancer patients who received MDTcare from August 2014 to June 2022. Patient satisfaction with MDT care was evaluated by selfadministeredquestionnaires consisting of 9 questions. Results Of 450, 298 (66.2%) were male and 152 (33.8%) were female. The mean age was60.8±14.7 year. The most common primary site was the larynx (17.3%), followed by the oralcavity and oropharynx. A total of 726 cases of the MDT approach were performed in 266MDT sessions, and the mean number of patients per MDT session was 2.74. The number ofmedical professionals participating in MDT ranged from a minimum of 3 to a maximum of 9,with a mean of 5.11. The mean running time of MDT meetings per case was 19.51 minutes. The time of the 2nd MDT was significantly shorter than that of the 1st or 3rd MDT. The meanscore was close to very satisfactory in each of the 9 patient satisfaction questions. Conclusion We believe that the MDT approach is feasible and recommend its introductionfor the treatment of head and neck cancer as most patients have shown very high satisfaction. Further studies on the role and efficacy of MDT care for head and neck cancer are necessary.
참고문헌 (18)
- Hansen CC, "Patterns of multidisciplinary care of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in medicare patients", JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 146(12), pp.1136~1146 (2020)
- Beeram M, "Barriers to comprehensive multidisciplinary head and neck care in a community oncology practice", Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, 41, pp.1~10 (2021)
- Chang YL, "Association between multidisciplinary team care and the completion of treatment for oral squamous cell carcinoma: A cohort populationbased study", Eur J Cancer Care(Engl), 30(2), pp.e13367~ (2021)
- Liu JC, "The impact of the multidisciplinary tumor board on head and neck cancer outcomes", Laryngoscope, 130(4), pp.946~950 (2020)
- Verdonck-de Leeuw I, "European Head and Neck Society recommendations for head and neck cancer survivorship care", Oral Oncol, 133, pp.106047~ (2022)
- Westin T, "Tumour boards", multidisciplinary head and neck cancer meetings: Are they of value to patients, treating staffor a political additional drain on healthcare resources?, 2008, pp.16(2), 103~107
- Chaillou D, "Presence in head and neck cancer multidisciplinary team meeting : The patient’s experience and satisfaction", Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 136(2), pp.75~82 (2019)
- Chi Hoon Maeng, "Practice patterns of multidisciplinary team meetings in Korean cancer care and patient satisfaction with this approach", The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 35(1), pp.205~214 (2020), 대한내과학회[DOI]
- Taberna M, "The multidisciplinary team(MDT)approach and quality of care", Front Oncol, 10, pp.85~ (2020)
- De Felice F, "Multidisciplinary team in head and neck cancer : A management model", Med Oncol, 36(1), pp.2~ (2018)
- Varkey P, "Multidisciplinary treatment of head and neck cancer", Semin Plast Surg, 24(3), pp.331~334 (2010)
- Brunner M, "Head and neck multidisciplinary team meetings : Effect on patient management", Head Neck, 37(7), pp.1046~1050 (2015)
- Rankin NM, "Cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in practice : Results from a multi-institutional quantitative survey and implications for policy change", Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 14(1), pp.74~83 (2018)
- Campennì A, "Personalized management of differentiated thyroid cancer in real life-practical guidance from a multidisciplinary panel of experts", Endocrine, 70(2), pp.280~291 (2020)
- Mullan BJ, "Analysis of time taken to discuss new patients with head and neck cancer in multidisciplinary team meetings", Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 52(2), pp.128~133 (2014)
- Shang C, "Impact of multidisciplinary team management on the survival rate of head and neck cancer patients : A cohort study meta-analysis", Front Oncol, 11, pp.630906~ (2021)
- Kelly SL, "Multidisciplinary clinic care improves adherence to best practice in head and neck cancer", Am J Otolaryngol, 34(1), pp.57~60 (2013)
- Townsend M, "Multidisciplinary clinic management of head and neck cancer", JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 143(12), pp.1213~1219 (2017)