형법 제263조의 적용범위
The Scope of Application of Article 263 of the Criminal Act
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since causation is denied in the case that an independent act concurs and it is not ascertainable which act has produced the result thereof, a person shall not be punished as a consummated crime, but shall be punished only if there is a punishable provision of attempted crimes. However, Article 263 of the Korean Criminal Act shall not punish as an attempt in case of ‘injuring the latter’, but shall punish as co-principals so that it is reasonable for Article 263 to be abrogated because of a principle of liability in Criminal Law, principle of presumption of innocence, substantial truth, and absence of equity. However, Article 263 of the present Criminal Act shall be interpreted to be applied limitedly with respect to a scope of application which is strict and clear. The criterion of the interpretation shall be found on organic form of Criminal Law. Under the organic form of Criminal Law, Article 263 of the Criminal Act is regulated within Chapter 25. Therefore, Article 263 of the Criminal Act shall be only applied to Chapter 25 (Crimes of Inflicting Bodily Injury and Violence), but shall not be applied to Chapter 26 (Crimes of Inflicting Bodily Injury and Death through Negligence), Chapter 27 (The Crimes of Abortion). As a result, it is the most rational for Article 263 of the Criminal Act to be interpreted within the scope of Chapter 25
Abstract
Since causation is denied in the case that an independent act concurs and it is not ascertainable which act has produced the result thereof, a person shall not be punished as a consummated crime, but shall be punished only if there is a punishable provision of attempted crimes. However, Article 263 of the Korean Criminal Act shall not punish as an attempt in case of ‘injuring the latter’, but shall punish as co-principals so that it is reasonable for Article 263 to be abrogated because of a principle of liability in Criminal Law, principle of presumption of innocence, substantial truth, and absence of equity. However, Article 263 of the present Criminal Act shall be interpreted to be applied limitedly with respect to a scope of application which is strict and clear. The criterion of the interpretation shall be found on organic form of Criminal Law. Under the organic form of Criminal Law, Article 263 of the Criminal Act is regulated within Chapter 25. Therefore, Article 263 of the Criminal Act shall be only applied to Chapter 25 (Crimes of Inflicting Bodily Injury and Violence), but shall not be applied to Chapter 26 (Crimes of Inflicting Bodily Injury and Death through Negligence), Chapter 27 (The Crimes of Abortion). As a result, it is the most rational for Article 263 of the Criminal Act to be interpreted within the scope of Chapter 25
참고문헌 (37)
- 권오걸, (2009), 헝설출판사
- 김성돈, "형법각론(제2판)" (2009), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 김성돈, "형법총론(제2판)" (2009), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 김성천, "형법각론" (2006), 동현출판사
- 김성천, "형법총론(제4판)" (2008), 삼양애드
- 김일수, "한국형법Ⅲ(각론 상)" (1997), 박영사
- 김일수, "새로 쓴 형법각론(제7판)" (2009), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법각론(제8판)" (2011), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법총론(제8판)" (2009), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법각론(제6전정판)" (2006), 홍문사
- 배종대, "형법총론(제9개정판)" (2009), 홍문사
- 손동권, "형법각론 제3개정판" (2010), 율곡출판사
- 신동운, "신형사소송법 제2판" (2009), 법문사
- 신동운, "형법총론(제4판)" (2009), 법문사
- 이재상, "형법각론(제7판)" (2010), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법총론(제7판)" (2011), 박영사
- 이정원, "형법각론" (2003), 삼지원
- 이형국, "형법총론(제4판)" (2007), 법문사
- 임웅, "형법각론(제3정판 보정)" (2011), 법문사
- 임웅, "형법총론(제3정판 보정)" (2011), 법문사
- 오영근, "형법각론" (2006), 박영사
- 정성근, "형법각론(제4판)" (2011), 삼영사
- 정성근, "형법총론(제5판)" (2011), 삼지원
- 정영일, "형법각론(제3판)" (2011), 박영사
- 정영일, "형법총론(제3판)" (2010), 박영사
- 정웅석, "형법강의 전정제2판" (2009), 대명출판사
- 조준현, "형법각론(개정판)" (2005), 삼지원
- 진계호, "형법총론(제8판)" (2007), 대왕사
- 김신규, "상해의 동시범 특례규정에 대한 검토", 형사법연구, (22) (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 김일수, "상해죄 해석론과 입법론", 법학논집, 28 (1992), 고려대학교 법학연구소
- 박기석, "폭력범죄 규정 정비방안", 형사법연구, (22) (2004), 한국형사법학회
- 배종대, "상해죄와 동시범특례", 고시연구, 35 (2005), 고시연구사
- 염정철, "동시범의 법리", 사법행정, 11(1) (1970), 한국사법행정학회
- 오영근, "상해죄 및 상해치사죄의 동시범", 고시연구 (2000), 고시연구사
- 하태훈, "독립행위의 경합의 특례, 대법원 2000년7월28일 선고, 2000도2466판결", 법률신문, ~ (2001)
- 이용식, "상해치사의 공동정범과 상해죄의 동시범 특례", 고시계 (2000), 고시계사
- 이형국, "동시범", 고시연구 (1984), 고시연구사