본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

보편적 난민법치에 대한 연구: 미국 법원판례를 중심으로

A Legal Study on the Rule of Refugee Law: Lessons from the U.S.A Courts Cases

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The 1951 Refugee Convention provides that a refugee is someone who "owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to, or owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country." Refugees have no protection from their own state - indeed it is often their own government that is threatening to persecute them. If other countries do not let them in, and do not help them once they are in, then they may be condemning them to death - or to an intolerable life in the shadows, without sustenance and without rights. Owing to this strange situation, asylum and refugee status are special legal protections available to person who have left their home country for their own safety and are afraid to return. The practice of granting asylum to people fleeing persecution in foreign lands is one of the earliest hallmarks of civilization. Protecting refugees was made the core mandate of the UN refugee agency, which was set up to look after refugees. The UNHCR has offered protection and assistance to tens of millions of refugees. There are two kinds of refugee admission process. One is asylum process and the other is ordinary refuge process. And then what's the difference between asylum and refugee status under U.S. immigration laws? Under the U.S.A law, people outside of the United States must apply for refugee status. On the contrary people who have already made it to the United States border or the interior (perhaps by using a visa or by entering illegally) can apply for asylum status. Once granted, both statuses allow them to stay in the United States indefinitely. Asylees and refugees are given permission to work and are allowed to apply for a green card (within one year of either entering the United States as a refugee or being approved for asylum). However, determining eligibility and applying for asylum or refugee status isn't easy. The U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement(ORR) provides new populations with the opportunity to maximize their potential in the United States. The U.S.A's refugee process is one of the most exemplary system controled by due process of law. Mean while, as one of the Republic of Korea’s response to the refugee issues, the Congress of Korea legislated a new law which was named the Refugee Act which will be executed from july 1, 2013. The Refugee Act is intended to make it easier for the Republic of Korea to assist refugees by providing international standard decision and support, during and after the final decision for the status. For the successful implementation of this law, especially lessons from the U.S.A refugee decision cases is very useful. From all these points of view, this paper examines the right and needed refuge decision process for corresponding to due process of law. Actually, the aim of this work is to enhance and emphasis the necessity of the establishment of a standard refugee decision principle and process in the Republic of Korea. For this purpose, this paper analyzes the U.S.A refugee decision process and model cases by the U.S.A court under the international refugee convention.

Abstract

The 1951 Refugee Convention provides that a refugee is someone who "owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to, or owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country." Refugees have no protection from their own state - indeed it is often their own government that is threatening to persecute them. If other countries do not let them in, and do not help them once they are in, then they may be condemning them to death - or to an intolerable life in the shadows, without sustenance and without rights. Owing to this strange situation, asylum and refugee status are special legal protections available to person who have left their home country for their own safety and are afraid to return. The practice of granting asylum to people fleeing persecution in foreign lands is one of the earliest hallmarks of civilization. Protecting refugees was made the core mandate of the UN refugee agency, which was set up to look after refugees. The UNHCR has offered protection and assistance to tens of millions of refugees. There are two kinds of refugee admission process. One is asylum process and the other is ordinary refuge process. And then what's the difference between asylum and refugee status under U.S. immigration laws? Under the U.S.A law, people outside of the United States must apply for refugee status. On the contrary people who have already made it to the United States border or the interior (perhaps by using a visa or by entering illegally) can apply for asylum status. Once granted, both statuses allow them to stay in the United States indefinitely. Asylees and refugees are given permission to work and are allowed to apply for a green card (within one year of either entering the United States as a refugee or being approved for asylum). However, determining eligibility and applying for asylum or refugee status isn't easy. The U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement(ORR) provides new populations with the opportunity to maximize their potential in the United States. The U.S.A's refugee process is one of the most exemplary system controled by due process of law. Mean while, as one of the Republic of Korea’s response to the refugee issues, the Congress of Korea legislated a new law which was named the Refugee Act which will be executed from july 1, 2013. The Refugee Act is intended to make it easier for the Republic of Korea to assist refugees by providing international standard decision and support, during and after the final decision for the status. For the successful implementation of this law, especially lessons from the U.S.A refugee decision cases is very useful. From all these points of view, this paper examines the right and needed refuge decision process for corresponding to due process of law. Actually, the aim of this work is to enhance and emphasis the necessity of the establishment of a standard refugee decision principle and process in the Republic of Korea. For this purpose, this paper analyzes the U.S.A refugee decision process and model cases by the U.S.A court under the international refugee convention.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. 김원숙, "출입국관리정책론" (2008), 한민족
  2. "난민법(2012.2.10, 제정 2013. 7. 1, 시행, 법률 제11298호)", ~ (2012)
  3. "법무부 출입국ᆞ외국인정책본부, 출입국ᆞ외국인정책, 통계월보(2010년 11월호)", ~ (2010)
  4. 이종상, "인신에 관한 자유권과 적법절차", 경남법학, 3 (1987)
  5. 유승하, "미국헌법상 적법절차 법리와 전개에 관한 연구 : 실체적 적법절차를 중심으로", 석사, 법학, pp.2004
  6. 임지봉, "미국헌법상의 적법절차조항과 그 운용", 미국헌법연구, (13) (2002)
  7. 한희원, "국제인권법 원론 - 이론과 케이스" (2012), 삼영사
  8. 한희원, "법학입문" (2011), 삼영사
  9. 한희원, "미국 애국법의 법규범적 의의: 초국가적안보위협세력에의 법규범적대응", 중앙법학
  10. Hee Won Han, "Newly arising issues on the limitation of intervention law and refugees under the North Korean Human Rights Act of 2004", Atoms for Peace: An International Journal, 1(4) (2007)
  11. 홍성찬, "적법절차의 원리와 적용", 사회과학연구, 10 (1999), 건국대학교 사회정책연구소
  12. "대법원 2008. 7.24 선고 2007두3930 판결", ~ (2008)
  13. "대법원 2012. 4.26,선고 2010두27448 판결", ~ (2012)
  14. "서울고등법원 2012. 3.7 선고, 2011누30757 판결", ~ (2012)
  15. "서울행정법원 2010. 4.1 선고, 2009구합38312 판결", ~ (2010)
  16. "Board of Immigration Appeals", 19 I. & N. Dec. 211; Supra note 12, ~ (1985)
  17. "Bolanos-Hernandez v. INS, 767 F. 2d 1277", ~ (1985)
  18. Daniel Moeckli, "International Human Rights Law" (2010), Oxford University Press
  19. David Weissbrodt, "International Human Rights: Law, Policy, and Process" (2001), LexisNexis
  20. "Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion", pp.729~744
  21. Henry J. Steiner, "International Human Rights in Context: Law Politics Morals" (2007), Oxford University Press
  22. "INS v. Orlando Ventura - 537 U.S.", 12~ (2002)
  23. "INS v. Predrag Stevic, 467 U.S", 407~ (1984)
  24. "INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S.", 421~ (1987)
  25. "International Response and U.S. Policy Options", Congressional Research Service(CRS) (2007)
  26. James D. Seymour, "China: Background Paper on the Situation of North Koreans in China, A Writenet Report commissioned by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees", Protection Information Section, ~ (2005)
  27. Kristin A. Bresnahan, "The Board of Immigration Appeals's New Social Visibility Test for Determining Membership of a Particular Social Group in Asylum Claims and Its Legal Policy Implications", Berkeley Journal of International Law, 29(2)
  28. The Border-crossing North Koreans: Current Situations and Future Prospects, "Lee, Keumsoon", Korea Institute for National Unification, ~, pp.Studies Series 06-05 (2006)
  29. "Matter of Acosta, 19 I. & N. Dec", 211~233 (1985)
  30. "Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S.", 319~ (1937)
  31. "Report to the Congress Proposed refugee admissions for fiscal year 2009", ~ (2009)
  32. "SEC v. Chenery Corp., 318 U.S", 80~88 (1943)
  33. Spreadsheet: Inflows of asylum seekers into selected OECD countries. Associated migration report: OECD International Migration Outlook, , ~ (2009)
  34. Stephen H. Legomsky, "Immigration and Refugee Law and Policy" (2005), Thomson West
  35. "The Immigration and Nationality Act", ~
  36. "The Slaughter-House Cases", 36~ (1873)
  37. "U.N. Doc. HCR", GIP, 02, 2002[DOI]
  38. "U.S.A Constitution Amendment XIV (1868)(Citizenship Rights)", ~ (1868)
  39. "United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit12 F.3d 1233", ~ (1993)
  40. "시리아 인도적 위기, 한계 상황 직면"[URL]
  41. "난민신청자 암 판정 직후 사망…"인권 사각지대 방치" 카메룬인심사 기다리다 숨져…난민단체 "생계위협 심각""[URL]
  42. "UNHCR"[URL]
  43. "UNHCR Global Appeal 2012-2013-Populations of concern to UNHCR"[URL]
  44. "Asylum in the United States"[URL]
  45. "UNHCR hand book"[URL]
  46. "UNHCR 2011 Global Trends annex tables Tab 10"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)