모음탈락과 모음축약의 음운론적 상관성
The phonological relation between vowel deletion and vowel coalescence
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of this paper is to elucidate the phonological relation between vowel deletion and vowel coalescence, focusing on the interaction among phonological features. In the previous segment-based research on hiatus resolution, vowel deletion and vowel coalescence have been generally analyzed as different phonological processes, even though they conspire with other processes such as glide formation, glide insertion, and diphthogization in regulating a vowel sequence without an intervening consonant or glide. The present study, however, argues that vowel deletion and vowel coalescence are virtually identical processes, sharing the same phonological motivation of realizing phonologically active features in Korean. As phonologically active features, features such as [-back],[-high], and [+round] are selected in phonetic outputs over features such as [+back],[+high], and [-round]. In this respect, this study emphasizes the importance of selecting the accurate phonological unit in the analysis of phonological phenomena and capturing phonologically-significant co-relations among phonological processes. Based on the analysis of this study, it can be argued that the segmental difference between vowel deletion and vowel coalescence is a merely epiphenomenon of feature faithfulness. In addition, the traditional division of hiatus-related phonological processes into vowel deletion and vowel coalescence can be regarded as a theoretical residue of segment-based phonological research.
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to elucidate the phonological relation between vowel deletion and vowel coalescence, focusing on the interaction among phonological features. In the previous segment-based research on hiatus resolution, vowel deletion and vowel coalescence have been generally analyzed as different phonological processes, even though they conspire with other processes such as glide formation, glide insertion, and diphthogization in regulating a vowel sequence without an intervening consonant or glide. The present study, however, argues that vowel deletion and vowel coalescence are virtually identical processes, sharing the same phonological motivation of realizing phonologically active features in Korean. As phonologically active features, features such as [-back],[-high], and [+round] are selected in phonetic outputs over features such as [+back],[+high], and [-round]. In this respect, this study emphasizes the importance of selecting the accurate phonological unit in the analysis of phonological phenomena and capturing phonologically-significant co-relations among phonological processes. Based on the analysis of this study, it can be argued that the segmental difference between vowel deletion and vowel coalescence is a merely epiphenomenon of feature faithfulness. In addition, the traditional division of hiatus-related phonological processes into vowel deletion and vowel coalescence can be regarded as a theoretical residue of segment-based phonological research.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김종규, "히아투스와 音節", 한국문화, (31), pp.1~22 (2003), 규장각한국학연구원
- 김종규, "음운현상의 수의성과 음장", 어문학, (92), pp.19~48 (2006), 한국어문학회
- 김종규, "동화에 의한 재구조화와 비자동적 교체", 어문학, (98), pp.29~66 (2007), 한국어문학회
- 배주채, "고흥방언의 음운론적 연구", 박사, pp.1994
- 송철의, "국어의 활음화와 관련된 몇 문제", pp.269~292 (1995), 단국어문논집 창간호
- 이숭녕, "15 세기의 모음체계와 이중모음의 Kontraktion적 발달에 대하여", 동방학지, 1, pp.331~432 (1954)
- 유재원, "현대 국어 모음충돌 회피 현상에 대하여", 한글, 189, pp.3~24 (1985)
- 이병근, "음운규칙과 비음운론적 제약", 국어학, 3, pp.17~44 (1975)
- 이병근, "국어의 장모음화와 보상성", 국어학, 6, pp.1~28 (1978)
- 이진호, "국어 활용형에 적용되는 모음 축약", 어학연구, 40(1), pp.177~194 (2004), 언어교육원
- 정승철, "제주도 방언의 통시음운론", 박사, pp.1995
- 한영균, "비음절화 규칙의 통시적 변화와 그 의미", 울산어문논집, 4, pp.1~26 (1988)
- ARCHANGELI, "Grounded Phonology.Cambridge:MIT Press Grounded Phonology" (1994), MIT Press
- CASALI, "Resolving Hiatus", 박사, pp.1996
- CHOMSKY, "The Sound Pattern of English" (1968), Harper & Row
- DE HASS, WIM, "A Formal Theory of Vowel Coalescence" (1988), Foris
- DE LACY, PAUL, "The Formal Expression of Markedness", 박사, pp.2002
- GOLDSMITH,JOHN, "Autosegmental Phonology", 박사, pp.1976
- HAN, EUNJOO, "Vowel coalescence and faithfulness. Studies in Phonetic", Phonology and Morphology, 12(3), pp.699~722 (2006)
- HAYES, BRUCE, "Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.253~306 (1989)
- HOOPER,JOAN, "An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology" (1976), Academic Press
- KAGER,RENE, "Optimality Theory" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- KIRCHNER, ROBERT, "Contrastiveness and faithfulness", Phonology, 14, pp.83~111 (1997)
- LOMBARDI, "Evidence for MaxFeature constrinats from Japanese", University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, pp.41~62 (1998)
- PULLUM, "The Duke of York gambit", Journal of Linguistics, 12, pp.83~102 (1976)
- KIM, JONG-KYOO, "Quantity-Sensitivity and Feature-Sensitivity of Vowels: A Constraint-Based Approach to Korean Vowel Phonology", 박사, pp.2000
- LAMONTAGNE, GREG, "A correspondence account of coalescence", University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18, pp.211~223 (1995)
- MESTER, "The quantitative trochee in Latin", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, pp.1~61 (1994)
- MCCARTHY, JOHN, "Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction. Ms" (1993), University of Massachusetts at Amherst and Rutgers University
- MCCARTHY, JOHN, "Faithfulness and reduplicative identity", University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 18, pp.249~384 (1995)
- PRINCE, "Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar", Technical Report #2. Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science (1993)
- ROSENTHALL, SAM, "Vowel", Glide Alternation in a Theory of Constraint Interaction, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 1994
- ZOLL, CHERYL, "Parsing below the Segment in a Constraint-based Framework", 박사, pp.1996