본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Lexical and phonological effects on phonological variation in L2 English palatalization

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study investigates how Korean L2 speakers produce word-final alveolars placed in the word-boundary palatalization environment in English. The purpose of our research is to see whether they show production variation according to lexical factors such as word frequency and wordhood and phonological factors such as word-final alveolar types, number of syllables of the target words, number of word-final codas, etc. Four possible pronunciation variants were identified for word-final alveolars (canonical, palatalization, deletion, and wrong pronunciation). First, the results showed that like previous studies on L1 production, phonological variation was found for Korean L2 speakers. Specifically, canonical variants were predominant, and then the realization of palatalization was also common, whereas mispronounced variants such as deletion and wrong pronunciation were quite rare. Second, word frequency affected the likelihood of palatalization similar to native speakers of English. Palatalization was found more in high-frequency words than in low-frequency words. Third, wordhood affected the likelihood of palatalization. Fourth, production patterns as well as the likelihood of palatalization were affected by word-final alveolar types. Finally, backness of the vowels preceding word-final alveolars affected the occurrences of palatalized variants. That is, word-final alveolars underwent palatalization immediately following front vowels more frequently than back vowels. These findings suggest that production variability is observed even for L2 speakers as well as for L1 speakers. Furthermore, they provide additional support for the claim that frequency may be encoded in word representation of L2 speakers’ mental lexicon. Finally, they revealed that many phonological factors contribute to variability of production of categorical phonological rules by L2 speakers, indicating that listeners might consider lexical and phonological factors to recover speakers’ intended words.

Abstract

This study investigates how Korean L2 speakers produce word-final alveolars placed in the word-boundary palatalization environment in English. The purpose of our research is to see whether they show production variation according to lexical factors such as word frequency and wordhood and phonological factors such as word-final alveolar types, number of syllables of the target words, number of word-final codas, etc. Four possible pronunciation variants were identified for word-final alveolars (canonical, palatalization, deletion, and wrong pronunciation). First, the results showed that like previous studies on L1 production, phonological variation was found for Korean L2 speakers. Specifically, canonical variants were predominant, and then the realization of palatalization was also common, whereas mispronounced variants such as deletion and wrong pronunciation were quite rare. Second, word frequency affected the likelihood of palatalization similar to native speakers of English. Palatalization was found more in high-frequency words than in low-frequency words. Third, wordhood affected the likelihood of palatalization. Fourth, production patterns as well as the likelihood of palatalization were affected by word-final alveolar types. Finally, backness of the vowels preceding word-final alveolars affected the occurrences of palatalized variants. That is, word-final alveolars underwent palatalization immediately following front vowels more frequently than back vowels. These findings suggest that production variability is observed even for L2 speakers as well as for L1 speakers. Furthermore, they provide additional support for the claim that frequency may be encoded in word representation of L2 speakers’ mental lexicon. Finally, they revealed that many phonological factors contribute to variability of production of categorical phonological rules by L2 speakers, indicating that listeners might consider lexical and phonological factors to recover speakers’ intended words.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. BELL, ALAN, "Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, pp.1001~1024 (2003)
  2. "Praat: Doing phonetics by compuer" (2009)[URL]
  3. BOOIJ, GEERT, "The Phonology of Dutch" (1995), Clarendon Press
  4. BUSH, NATHAN, "Frequency effects and word-boundary palatalization in English, In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure", pp.255~280 (2001), Benjamins Publishing Company
  5. BYBEE, JOAN, "Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure" (2001), John Benjamins
  6. CHOMSKY, NOAM, "The Sound Pattern of English" (1968), Harper and Row
  7. "Phonological variation and lexical frequency" (2008)[URL]
  8. COOPER, WILLIAM, "Syntax and Speech" (1980), Harvard University Press
  9. DALBY, JONATHAN M., "Phonetic structure of fast speech in American English", 박사, pp.1986
  10. DILLEY, LAURA C., "A study of regressive place assimilation in spontaneous speech and its implications for spoken word recognition", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(4), pp.2340~2353 (2007)
  11. ERNESTUS, MIRJAM, "Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch : A Corpus-Based Study of the Phonology-Phonetics Interface. LOT : Utrecht" (2000), LOT
  12. ERNESTUS, MIRJAM, "Lexical frequency and voice assimilation", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(2), pp.1040~1051 (2006)
  13. GASKELL, M. GARETH, "Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, pp.144~158 (1998)
  14. GOLDRICK, MATTHEW, "Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production", Cognition, 102, pp.219~260 (2007)
  15. GUY, GREGORY R., "Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion, In Locating Language in Time and Space" (1980), Academic Press
  16. Michael Hammond, "Frequency, cyclicity, and optimality", 음성음운형태론연구, 10(3), pp.349~364 (2004), 한국음운론학회
  17. 홍성훈, "Variation and frequency in word-medial", t, 음성음운형태론연구, pp.2009, 15(2)[DOI]
  18. HUALDE, JOSE IGNACIO, "Basque Phonology" (1991), Routledge
  19. IMAI, SATOMI, "Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(2), pp.896~907 (2005)
  20. JESCHENIAK, JÖRG D., "Word frequency effects in spoken production: Retrieval of syntactic information and phonological form", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, pp.824~843 (1994)
  21. JOHNSON, KEITH, "Massive reduction in conversational American English", Proceedings of the 1st Session of the 10th International Symposium (In Spontaneous Speech: Data and Analysis, pp.29~54 (2004), The National International Institute for Japanese Language
  22. JURAFSKY, DANIEL, "Probabilitistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production, In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure", pp.229~254 (2001), Benjamins Publishing Company
  23. KUIPERS, CECILE, "The influence of rhythmic context on schwa epenthesis and schwa deletion in Dutch", Language and Speech, 41, pp.87~108 (1998)
  24. LADEFOGED, PETER, "A Course in Phonetics (Fifth Edition)" (2006), Thomson Wadsworth
  25. LEECH, GEOFFREY, "Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English" (2001), Pearson Education
  26. LUCE, PAUL A., "Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model", Ear and Hearing, 19, pp.1~36 (1998)
  27. MITTERER, HOLGER, "Listeners recover", t, t, pp.-lenition in Dutch, Journal of Phonetics[DOI]
  28. MORRISETTE, MICHELE L., "Lexical organization and phonological change in treatment", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, pp.143~159 (2002)
  29. MIOZZO, MICHELE, "When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, pp.228~252 (2003)
  30. PATTERSON, DAVID, "A corpus analysis of variant frequency in American English flap production", Phonetica, 58, pp.254~275 (2001)
  31. PITT, MARK, "How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words", Journal of Memory and Language, 61(1), pp.19~36 (2009)
  32. PLUYMAEKERS, MARK, "Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 18, pp.2561~2569 (2005)
  33. RAYMOND, WILLIAM, "Word-medial", t,d, Language Variation and Change, pp.2006, 18(1)[DOI]
  34. SHATZMAN, KEREN B., "The word frequency effect in picture naming: Contrasting two hypothesis using homonym pictures", Brain and Language, 90, pp.160~169 (2004)
  35. VITEVITCH, MICHAEL S., "The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, pp.735~747 (2002)
  36. 윤관희, "The effects of neighborhood density and word frequency on the production of English-learning Korean speakers", 음성음운형태론연구, 16(2), pp.217~243 (2010), 한국음운론학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)