본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

영어 수동문의 한국어 번역 연구:현행 고등학교 영어교과서 번역사례 중심으로

A Study on English-Korean Translation of Passive Construction: Focusing on the Translation Cases of Current Highschool English Textbooks

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

This study shows that there are many differences and characteristics of Passive Construction in English-Korean translation. In English-Korean translation, the English passive has long been recognized as one of the difficult elements and has received great attention from translators and researchers. In translating passive construction, the difficulties of finding the exact counterpart expressions of the two languages often arise from the main structural differences in word order, the deletability of the recoverable subject, and the existence and distribution of prepositions and diverse transitive verbs that require objects. Through this study, we could recognize that many passive sentences in English are usually expressed as active forms in Korean by experts. That is why the passive voice appears more frequently in English. Also, generally speaking, it is more natural and proper to use active voice than passive voice in Korean language system. Because Korean has the free word-order, the topicalization, the use of thematic markers such as 'eun, nun', it is not necessary to express passive voice in Korean versions. Also, we could find distinctive translational properties of nonprofessional group. Beginners tend to be stuck in clichés or so-called 'translationese' expressions and in literal translation. However, professionals are apt to interpret a word into as many different meanings as possible on the basis of the given contexts. This study indicates that for a better understanding of English and English-Korean translation it is necessary for college students to take lessons on Korean as well as English and translation practice in a formal curriculum. By such practicing and training, beginners could reach perfect translation standard.

Abstract

This study shows that there are many differences and characteristics of Passive Construction in English-Korean translation. In English-Korean translation, the English passive has long been recognized as one of the difficult elements and has received great attention from translators and researchers. In translating passive construction, the difficulties of finding the exact counterpart expressions of the two languages often arise from the main structural differences in word order, the deletability of the recoverable subject, and the existence and distribution of prepositions and diverse transitive verbs that require objects. Through this study, we could recognize that many passive sentences in English are usually expressed as active forms in Korean by experts. That is why the passive voice appears more frequently in English. Also, generally speaking, it is more natural and proper to use active voice than passive voice in Korean language system. Because Korean has the free word-order, the topicalization, the use of thematic markers such as 'eun, nun', it is not necessary to express passive voice in Korean versions. Also, we could find distinctive translational properties of nonprofessional group. Beginners tend to be stuck in clichés or so-called 'translationese' expressions and in literal translation. However, professionals are apt to interpret a word into as many different meanings as possible on the basis of the given contexts. This study indicates that for a better understanding of English and English-Korean translation it is necessary for college students to take lessons on Korean as well as English and translation practice in a formal curriculum. By such practicing and training, beginners could reach perfect translation standard.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 강수언, "한국어와 영어의 비교연구" (1992), 한신문화사
  2. 자습서, "High School English Ⅰ교과서", pp.2005, 김덕기
  3. 자습서, "High School English 교과서", pp.2005, 김덕기
  4. 김상옥, "영어와 한국어의 수동태에 대한 대조연구", 박사, 영어영문학과, pp.1996
  5. 김정우, "영어를 우리말처럼 우리말을 영어처럼: 이론편" (1996), 창문사
  6. 김정우, "번역투의 성격 규명을 위한 다차원적 접근:진단에서 처방까지", 번역학연구, 8(1), pp.61~82 (2007), 한국번역학회
  7. 남기심, "표준 국어 문법론 개정판" (1993), 탑출판사
  8. 문용, "한국어의 발상·영어의 발상" (2005), 서울대학교출판부
  9. 송성문, "성문종합영어" (2004), 성문 출판사
  10. 서정수, "국어 문법의 연구 II" (1990), 한국문화사
  11. 서정수, "수정증보판. 국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
  12. 이근희, "영한번역에서의 번역투 연구", 박사, pp.2005
  13. 자습서, "High School 공통 영어 교과서", pp.2005, 이맹성
  14. 자습서, "High School 공통 영어 교과서", pp.2005, 이병민
  15. 이영옥, "한국어와 영어간 구조의 차이에 따른 번역의 문제-수동구문을 중심으로", 번역학 연구, 1(2), pp.47~76 (2000), 한국번역학회
  16. 이영옥, "무생물주어 타동사구문의 영한번역", 번역학 연구, 2(1) (2001)
  17. 이현석, "문화와 언어표현의 차이에 기초한 영한번역의 방법론 연구", 박사, 영어영문학과, pp.2006
  18. 자습서, "High School English Ⅰ교과서", pp.2005, 이흥수
  19. 조인정, "영한 번역의 문제점: 수동태를 중심으로", 번역학연구, 6(1), pp.121~142 (2005), 한국번역학회
  20. 천시권, "국어 피동법 연구", 국어연구, (30) (1983)
  21. Bolinger, D., "Meaning and Form" (1977), Longman
  22. Fillmore, C.F., "The Case for Case, In Universals in Linguistic Theory" (1968), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc
  23. Hawkins, J., "The Unity of English-German Contrasts" (1985), Croom Helm
  24. Hong, K. S., "The Passive Constructions in Korean, In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics Ⅳ", pp.491~502 (1991)
  25. "Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary" (2000), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)