본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

바울과 아우구스티누스의 법·국가사상 비교

Comparison between the law and national thoughts of Paul and ones of Augustine

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In this paper, after considering the law and national thoughts of Paul and Augustine individually, standpoints of these two men are evaluated on various levels like the origin of state power and the issue of limits, the necessity and legitimacy of state power, the duty of national political leaders, and the problem regarding the right of resistance. Paul is a person who explains the justice of God of Jesus Christ the best. Romans chapter 13 section 1 below and First Corinthians chapter 6 section 1 he wrote seem contradictory to each other. However, this is not to support already existing order but to avoid revolutionary means for Paul. In other words, because power is from God, it is saying that there will be judgement when disobeying it. Practically, the power of the state is provisionally needed. This opinion of Paul matches with the statement of Jesus christ saying that the authority of Pilatus is a tool actualizing the will of God and old prophecies with the divine origin. On the other hand, since the state and the power is given by God in order to restrain sins of corrupted humans, people should not only obey its authority and but also avoid defiance despite of the fact that the state itself is like a capital of chaos. He was stringy about accepting the independence and autonomy of justice in the matter of the state, and he thought that it is impossible for the state to exist unless it is based on the justice of the kingdom of God. In fact, it is said that the state is subordinate to the church regrading the matter of justice. In today’s state society believing in the separation of church and state, the law and national thoughts of Paul and Augustine are not totally reasonable. However, the community believing in christianity is still feeling the necessity of the state as well as its authority while subjecting to tensions between the kingdom of God and a civil society or the state. That is, it is not necessary to obey a general rule of not only extrinsic but also relative law. Yet, the community of believers knows that the general rule and the system on this earth is based on the eternal kingdom of God and his everlasting righteousness. In this sense, the law and national thoughts of Paul and Augustine are meaningful to the community of christians until these days.

Abstract

In this paper, after considering the law and national thoughts of Paul and Augustine individually, standpoints of these two men are evaluated on various levels like the origin of state power and the issue of limits, the necessity and legitimacy of state power, the duty of national political leaders, and the problem regarding the right of resistance. Paul is a person who explains the justice of God of Jesus Christ the best. Romans chapter 13 section 1 below and First Corinthians chapter 6 section 1 he wrote seem contradictory to each other. However, this is not to support already existing order but to avoid revolutionary means for Paul. In other words, because power is from God, it is saying that there will be judgement when disobeying it. Practically, the power of the state is provisionally needed. This opinion of Paul matches with the statement of Jesus christ saying that the authority of Pilatus is a tool actualizing the will of God and old prophecies with the divine origin. On the other hand, since the state and the power is given by God in order to restrain sins of corrupted humans, people should not only obey its authority and but also avoid defiance despite of the fact that the state itself is like a capital of chaos. He was stringy about accepting the independence and autonomy of justice in the matter of the state, and he thought that it is impossible for the state to exist unless it is based on the justice of the kingdom of God. In fact, it is said that the state is subordinate to the church regrading the matter of justice. In today’s state society believing in the separation of church and state, the law and national thoughts of Paul and Augustine are not totally reasonable. However, the community believing in christianity is still feeling the necessity of the state as well as its authority while subjecting to tensions between the kingdom of God and a civil society or the state. That is, it is not necessary to obey a general rule of not only extrinsic but also relative law. Yet, the community of believers knows that the general rule and the system on this earth is based on the eternal kingdom of God and his everlasting righteousness. In this sense, the law and national thoughts of Paul and Augustine are meaningful to the community of christians until these days.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 김세윤, "예수와 바울 “하나님 나라와 그리스도인들의 정치”" (2001), 두란노
  2. 문상희, "사도바울의 국가론", 기독교사상, 19(1) (1975)
  3. 박동균, "성 아우구스티누스의 법사상", 가톨릭 신학과 사상, (40) (2002)
  4. 송정헌, "로마서 13;1-7절 연구 : 바울의 국가에 대한 이해를 중심으로", 석사, pp.1996
  5. 신복윤, "칼빈의 국가관", 신학지남, 40(2) (1973)
  6. 안인섭, "어거스틴과 칼빈의 국가관-신국론과 기독교강요를 중심으로-", 신학지남, 72(3) (2005)
  7. 윤종하, "로마서공부" (1994), 모리아출판사
  8. 이장식, "교회와 국가" (1984), 문학예술사
  9. 이종성, "바르트의 교회와 국가", 기독교사상, 17(1) (1973)
  10. 홍인규, "로마서 어떻게 읽을 것인가" (2001), 성서유니온
  11. 아우구스티누스, "그리스도교 교양" (1989)
  12. E. P 샌더슨, "바울, 율법, 유대인" (1998), 크리스챤다이제스트
  13. Victor P. Furnish, "바울의 네 가지 윤리적 교훈" (1994), 종로서적
  14. Barclay, Willam, "바울의 인간과 사상" (1979), 기독교문사
  15. Bruce F.F, "바울과 예수" (1988), 아가페 출판사
  16. Dibelius,Martin Paulus, "바울의 인물, 사상, 역사" (1977), 종로서적
  17. Drane, John W., Paul, "바울" (1989), 두란노서원
  18. 도날드 거쓰리, "신약개론" (1995), 기독교문서선교회
  19. 디트리히 본회퍼, "국가와 교회" (1984), 범화사
  20. Herman Ridderbos, "바울신학" (1985), 개혁주의 신행협회
  21. Herman Ridderbos, "바울과 예수" (1984), 한국로고스연구원
  22. John Stott, "로마서 강해" (1996), IVP
  23. J. M. Porter, "루터의 정치사상" (1985), 컨콜디아사
  24. 오스카 쿨만, "국가와 하나님의 나라" (1999), 여수룬
  25. Victor P. Furnish, "바울의 네 가지 윤리적 교훈" (1994), 종로서적

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)