On the Production of the Complementizer -nun of Korean into English: With Respect to Its Translation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article discusses the way in which the complementizer -nun of Korean should be translated into that or which relative pronouns in English. We begin with an overview of pragmatic and social differences between the uses of that and which. Pragmatically, that is used to refer an attributive entity, while which is used to refer a particular entity in the given context. Socially, that is preferred among the people in lower social classes such as those with lower education,y in the givspeakers in America likivLhe no grad ativstudents and their children, which is preferred among those likivpoliticians. We then t is ze the preference between that and which in direct ohich is used toclauses in oral translation and written translation, as produced by 94 ad l iKorean EFL learners divided into basic, inteEFediati, and advanced groups and by eigh ithe givspeakers as the control group. The result shows that the learners generally prefer which but such a tendency is greater in written translation, while native speakers generally prefer that, in particular, in oral translation. The article then suggests the way to translate that and which into Korean.
Abstract
This article discusses the way in which the complementizer -nun of Korean should be translated into that or which relative pronouns in English. We begin with an overview of pragmatic and social differences between the uses of that and which. Pragmatically, that is used to refer an attributive entity, while which is used to refer a particular entity in the given context. Socially, that is preferred among the people in lower social classes such as those with lower education,y in the givspeakers in America likivLhe no grad ativstudents and their children, which is preferred among those likivpoliticians. We then t is ze the preference between that and which in direct ohich is used toclauses in oral translation and written translation, as produced by 94 ad l iKorean EFL learners divided into basic, inteEFediati, and advanced groups and by eigh ithe givspeakers as the control group. The result shows that the learners generally prefer which but such a tendency is greater in written translation, while native speakers generally prefer that, in particular, in oral translation. The article then suggests the way to translate that and which into Korean.
참고문헌 (10)
- Ball, Catherine N., "A diachronic study of relative markers in spoken and written English", Language Variation and Change, 8, pp.227~258 (1996)
- Bayley, Robert, "Relativization strategies in Mexican-American English", American Speech, 74, pp.115~139 (1999)
- Berni, Mary, "Restrictive relative pronouns in the survey of Oklahoma dialects", Annual meeting on New Ways of Analyzing Variations in English (NWAVE 24) (1995), University of Pennsylvania
- Bundrick, Camille, "An interference-based account of restrictive relative which and that", Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 19, pp.19~31 (1989)
- Flanigan, Beverly O., "Object relative pronoun use in native and non-native English: A variable rule analysis", Language Variation and Change, 8, pp.203~226 (1996)
- Guy, Gregory R., "On the choice of relative pronouns in English", American Speech, 70, pp.148~162 (1995)
- Kim, Alan Hyun-Oak, "Information flow and relative constructions in Korean discourse In: Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics", pp.463~493 (1994), CSLI
- Kim, Yong-Beom, "In progress", Linguistics errors by Korean EFL learners
- Lee, Il-Jae, "Development of morphosyntactic features of the complementizer phrase in L2 relative clauses of Korean learners", 박사, pp.2006
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Relativized minimality" (1990), The MIT Press