본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Presence of small and multiple gallstones increases the risk of biliary complications

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background: Approximately 20% of patients with gallbladder stones (GS) also have common bile duct stones. This subgroup is susceptible to biliary complications, including obstructive jaundice, acute ascending cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis. Risk factors for these complications include older age, the presence of comorbidities, and the existence of multiple GS. This study was conducted to investigate whether the size of GS represents a risk factor for biliary complications. Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared two age- and sex-matched groups. The study group comprised patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary complications, including obstructive jaundice, acute ascending cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis. The control group consisted of patients with GS who presented with non-specific symptoms and did not develop further biliary complications during long-term follow-up. Results: The study group (n = 57) exhibited smaller GS (3.93 ± 3.14 mm vs. 5.45 ± 3.64 mm, P < 0.01), a greater number of GS (8.30 ± 6.24 vs. 6.42 ± 5.63, P < 0.01), and a higher rate of gallbladder sludge (29.8% vs. 15.0%, P = 0.054) compared to the control group (n = 60). The three study subgroups— obstructive jaundice, acute ascending cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis—also displayed significantly smaller GS than the control group (4.6 ± 3.4 mm, 3.2 ± 2.9 mm, and 2.7 ± 1.1 mm vs. 5.45 ± 3.64 mm; P < 0.01, P < 0.006, and P < 0.036, respectively). Additionally, the obstructive jaundice and acute pancreatitis subgroups exhibited a higher number of GS compared to the control group (7.2 ± 6.8 and 7.4 ± 1.1 vs. 6.42 ± 5.63; P < 0.001 and P = 0.038, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with biliary complications displayed smaller and more numerous GS compared to those without such complications. Given the uncertainty surrounding the referral of patients with non-specific symptoms for cholecystectomy, incorporating the size and number of GS into the decision-making process may be worthwhile. Further prospective studies are warranted in this area.

Abstract

Background: Approximately 20% of patients with gallbladder stones (GS) also have common bile duct stones. This subgroup is susceptible to biliary complications, including obstructive jaundice, acute ascending cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis. Risk factors for these complications include older age, the presence of comorbidities, and the existence of multiple GS. This study was conducted to investigate whether the size of GS represents a risk factor for biliary complications. Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared two age- and sex-matched groups. The study group comprised patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary complications, including obstructive jaundice, acute ascending cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis. The control group consisted of patients with GS who presented with non-specific symptoms and did not develop further biliary complications during long-term follow-up. Results: The study group (n = 57) exhibited smaller GS (3.93 ± 3.14 mm vs. 5.45 ± 3.64 mm, P < 0.01), a greater number of GS (8.30 ± 6.24 vs. 6.42 ± 5.63, P < 0.01), and a higher rate of gallbladder sludge (29.8% vs. 15.0%, P = 0.054) compared to the control group (n = 60). The three study subgroups— obstructive jaundice, acute ascending cholangitis, and acute pancreatitis—also displayed significantly smaller GS than the control group (4.6 ± 3.4 mm, 3.2 ± 2.9 mm, and 2.7 ± 1.1 mm vs. 5.45 ± 3.64 mm; P < 0.01, P < 0.006, and P < 0.036, respectively). Additionally, the obstructive jaundice and acute pancreatitis subgroups exhibited a higher number of GS compared to the control group (7.2 ± 6.8 and 7.4 ± 1.1 vs. 6.42 ± 5.63; P < 0.001 and P = 0.038, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with biliary complications displayed smaller and more numerous GS compared to those without such complications. Given the uncertainty surrounding the referral of patients with non-specific symptoms for cholecystectomy, incorporating the size and number of GS into the decision-making process may be worthwhile. Further prospective studies are warranted in this area.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Shaffer EA, "Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease : has the paradigm changed in the 21st century?", Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 7, pp.132~140 (2005)
  2. Portincasa P, "Cholesterol gallstone disease", Lancet, 368, pp.230~239 (2006)
  3. Collins C, "A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy : natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited", Ann Surg, 239, pp.28~33 (2004)
  4. Tozatti J, "Predictor factors for choledocholithiasis", Arq Bras Cir Dig, 28, pp.109~112 (2015)
  5. Turner MA, "The cystic duct : normal anatomy and disease processes", Radiographics, 21, pp.3~22 (2001)
  6. Attili AF, "The natural history of gallstones : the GREPCO experience. The GREPCO Group", Hepatology, 21, pp.655~660 (1995)
  7. Shabanzadeh DM, "A prediction rule for risk stratification of incidentally discovered gallstones : results from a large cohort study", Gastroenterology, 150, pp.156~167 (2016)
  8. Festi D, "Natural history of gallstone disease: expectant management or active treatment? Results from a population-based cohort study", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 25, pp.719~724 (2010)
  9. Persson GE, "Expectant management of patients with gallbladder stones diagnosed at planned investigation. A prospective 5-to 7-year follow-up study of 153 patients", Scand J Gastroenterol, 31, pp.191~199 (1996)
  10. Venneman NG, "Small gallstones are associated with increased risk of acute pancreatitis : potential benefits of prophylactic cholecystectomy?", Am J Gastroenterol, 100, pp.2540~2550 (2005)
  11. Lee SP, "Biliary sludge as a cause of acute pancreatitis", N Engl J Med, 326, pp.589~593 (1992)
  12. Lee SP, "Origin and fate of biliary sludge", Gastroenterology, 94, pp.170~176 (1988)
  13. Diehl AK, "Gallstone size and risk of pancreatitis", Arch Intern Med, 157, pp.1674~1678 (1997)
  14. Lee YS, "Long-term outcomes of symptomatic gallbladder sludge", J Clin Gastroenterol, 49, pp.594~598 (2015)
  15. Hill PA, "Clinical importance and natural history of biliary sludge in outpatients", J Ultrasound Med, 35, pp.605~610 (2016)
  16. Janowitz P, "Gallbladder sludge : spontaneous course and incidence of complications in patients without stones", Hepatology, 20, pp.291~294 (1994)
  17. Neuhaus H, "Prospective evaluation of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy", Endoscopy, 24, pp.745~749 (1992)
  18. Saltzstein EC, "Preoperative bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and amylase levels as predictors of common duct stones", Surg Gynecol Obstet, 154, pp.381~384 (1982)
  19. Lacaine F, "Preoperative evaluation of the risk of common bile duct stones", Arch Surg, 115, pp.1114~1116 (1980)
  20. Houdart R, "Predicting common bile duct lithiasis : determination and prospective validation of a model predicting low risk", Am J Surg, 170, pp.38~43 (1995)
  21. Welbourn CR, "Selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy avoids bile duct exploration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy", Gut, 37, pp.576~579 (1995)
  22. Williams EJ, "Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones(CBDS)", Gut, 57, pp.1004~1021 (2008)
  23. Corfield AP, "Acute pancreatitis : a lethal disease of increasing incidence", Gut, 26, pp.724~729 (1985)
  24. Miura F, "Tokyo Guidelines 2018 : initial management of acute biliary infection and flowchart for acute cholangitis", J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 25, pp.31~40 (2018)
  25. Lamberts MP, "Indications of cholecystectomy in gallstone disease", Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 34, pp.97~102 (2018)
  26. European Association for the Study of the Liver(EASL), "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of gallstones", J Hepatol, 65, pp.146~181 (2016)
  27. Friedman GD, "Prognosis of gallstones with mild or no symptoms : 25 years of follow-up in a health maintenance organization", J Clin Epidemiol, 42, pp.127~136 (1989)
  28. Lamberts MP, "Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy : a systematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness", Surg Endosc, 27, pp.709~718 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

Gallstone pancreatitis: general clinical approach and the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyEvan L. Fogel, Mark Andrew Gromski, Shanker Kundumadam대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2021 · 제36권 제1호What Are the Risk Factors for Acute Suppurative Cholangitis Caused by Common Bile Duct Stones?김태현, 손영우, 염동한, 오효정거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2010 · 제4권 제3호Evaluating the Revised American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Common Bile Duct Stone DiagnosisAaron P. Thrift, Erin Y. Chew, Jake S. Jacob, Michelle E. Lee, Robert J. Sealock대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2021 · 제54권 제2호Cholecystectomy for Prevention of Recurrence after Endoscopic Clearance of Bile Duct Stones in Korea박승우, 박정엽, 방승민, 송명은, 송시영, 오탁근, 이동준, 정문재, 정재복연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2016 · 제57권 제1호Single-Stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction and Cholecystectomy during the Same HospitalizationAlan Kawarai Lefor, Hiroharu Shinozaki, Junji Furukawa, Kenji Kobayashi, Masaru Kimata, Satoshi Shinozaki, Toshiaki Terauchi, Yoshiro Ogata, Yuichi Sasakura대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2019 · 제52권 제1호The Role of Endoscopic Biliary Drainage without Sphincterotomy in Gallstone Patients with Cholangitis and Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones Not Detected by Cholangiogram or Intraductal Ultrasonography궁현정, 김민진, 문정호, 박상흠, 이윤나, 이태훈, 이혜경, 최문환, 최서연, 최현종거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2017 · 제11권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)