본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Cholecystectomy for Prevention of Recurrence after Endoscopic Clearance of Bile Duct Stones in Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: Cholecystectomy in patients with an intact gallbladder after endoscopic removal of stones from the common bile duct (CBD) remains controversial. We conducted a case-control study to determine the risk of recurrent CBD stones and the benefit of cholecystectomy for prevention of recurrence after endoscopic removal of stones from the CBD in Korean patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 317 patients who underwent endoscopic CBD stone extraction between 2006 and 2012 were included. Possible risk factors for the recurrence of CBD stones including previous cholecystectomy history, bile duct diameter, stone size, number of stones, stone composition, and the presence of a periampullary diverticulum were analyzed. Results: The mean duration of follow-up after CBD stone extraction was 25.4±22.0 months. A CBD diameter of 15 mm or larger [odds ratio (OR), 1.930; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.098 to 3.391; p=0.022] and the presence of a periampullary diverticulum (OR, 1.859; 95% CI, 1.014 to 3.408; p=0.045) were independent predictive factors for CBD stone recurrence. Seventeen patients (26.6%) in the recurrence group underwent elective cholecystectomy soon after endoscopic extraction of CBD stones, compared to 88 (34.8%) in the non-recurrence group; the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.212). Conclusion: A CBD diameter of 15 mm or larger and the presence of a periampullary diverticulum were found to be potential predictive factors for recurrence after endoscopic extraction of CBD stones. Elective cholecystectomy after clearance of CBD stones did not reduce the incidence of recurrent CBD stones in Korean patients.

Abstract

Purpose: Cholecystectomy in patients with an intact gallbladder after endoscopic removal of stones from the common bile duct (CBD) remains controversial. We conducted a case-control study to determine the risk of recurrent CBD stones and the benefit of cholecystectomy for prevention of recurrence after endoscopic removal of stones from the CBD in Korean patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 317 patients who underwent endoscopic CBD stone extraction between 2006 and 2012 were included. Possible risk factors for the recurrence of CBD stones including previous cholecystectomy history, bile duct diameter, stone size, number of stones, stone composition, and the presence of a periampullary diverticulum were analyzed. Results: The mean duration of follow-up after CBD stone extraction was 25.4±22.0 months. A CBD diameter of 15 mm or larger [odds ratio (OR), 1.930; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.098 to 3.391; p=0.022] and the presence of a periampullary diverticulum (OR, 1.859; 95% CI, 1.014 to 3.408; p=0.045) were independent predictive factors for CBD stone recurrence. Seventeen patients (26.6%) in the recurrence group underwent elective cholecystectomy soon after endoscopic extraction of CBD stones, compared to 88 (34.8%) in the non-recurrence group; the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.212). Conclusion: A CBD diameter of 15 mm or larger and the presence of a periampullary diverticulum were found to be potential predictive factors for recurrence after endoscopic extraction of CBD stones. Elective cholecystectomy after clearance of CBD stones did not reduce the incidence of recurrent CBD stones in Korean patients.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Classen M, "Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct (author’s transl)", Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 99, pp.496~497 (1974)
  2. Kawai K, "Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater", Gastrointest Endosc, 20, pp.148~151 (1974)
  3. Bergman JJ, "Long-term follow-up after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients younger than 60 years of age", Gastrointest Endosc, 44, pp.643~649 (1996)
  4. Tanaka M, "Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones", Gastrointest Endosc, 48, pp.465~469 (1998)
  5. Prat F, "Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis", Gastroenterology, 110, pp.894~899 (1996)
  6. Ando T, "Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy", Gut, 52, pp.116~121 (2003)
  7. Kim DI, "Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy", Gastrointest Endosc, 54, pp.42~48 (2001)
  8. Sugiyama M, "Risk factors predictive of late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term (more than 10 years) follow-up study", Am J Gastroenterol, 97, pp.2763~2767 (2002)
  9. Keizman D, "An angulated common bile duct predisposes to recurrent symptomatic bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction", Surg Endosc, 20, pp.1594~1599 (2006)
  10. Cheon YK, "Identification of risk factors for stone recurrence after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones", Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 18, pp.461~464 (2006)
  11. 이성환, "The First Experiences of Robotic Single-Site Cholecystectomy in Asia: A Potential Way to Expand Minimally-Invasive Single-Site Surgery?", Yonsei Medical Journal, 56(1), pp.189~195 (2015), 연세대학교의과대학[DOI]
  12. Boerma D, "Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial", Lancet, 360, pp.761~765 (2002)
  13. Lau JY, "Cholecystectomy or gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal in Chinese patients", Gastroenterology, 130, pp.96~103 (2006)
  14. Hammarstrom LE, "Endoscopic treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ: long-term outcome and factors", Scand J Gastroenterol, 31, pp.294~301 (1996)
  15. Lai JH, "Recurrent cholangitis after endoscopic lithotripsy of common bile duct stones with gallstones in situ: predictive factors with and without subsequent cholecystectomy", J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 22, pp.324~329 (2012)
  16. Hill J, "Risks of leaving the gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones", Br J Surg, 78, pp.554~557 (1991)
  17. Lai KH, "Does cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent the recurrence of biliary complications?", Gastrointest Endosc, 49(4 Pt 1), pp.483~487 (1999)
  18. Kwon SK, "Is cholecystectomy necessary after ERCP for bile duct stones in patients with gallbladder in situ?", Korean J Intern Med, 16, pp.254~259 (2001)
  19. Cui ML, "Long-term follow-up study of gallbladder in situ after endoscopic common duct stone removal in Korean patients", Surg Endosc, 27, pp.1711~1716 (2013)
  20. Heo J, "Should prophylactic cholecystectomy be performed in patients with concomitant gallstones after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones?", Surg Endosc, 29, pp.1574~1579 (2015)
  21. Lobo DN, "Periampullary diverticula and pancreaticobiliary disease", Br J Surg, 86, pp.588~597 (1999)
  22. Boix J, "Impact of periampullary duodenal diverticula at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a proposed classification of periampullary duodenal diverticula", Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 16, pp.208~211 (2006)
  23. Pereira-Lima JC, "Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms", Gastrointest Endosc, 48, pp.457~464 (1998)
  24. Geenen DJ, "The role of surveillance endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in preventing episodic cholangitis in patients with recurrent common bile duct stones", Endoscopy, 30, pp.18~20 (1998)
  25. Kim MH, "Association of periampullary diverticula with primary choledocholithiasis but not with secondary choledocholithiasis", Endoscopy, 30, pp.601~604 (1998)
  26. Tsai TJ, "The relationship between gallbladder status and recurrent biliary complications in patients with choledocholithiasis following endoscopic treatment", J Chin Med Assoc, 75, pp.560~566 (2012)
  27. Leiss O, "Effect of Rowachol on biliary lipid secretion and serum lipids in normal volunteers", Gut, 26, pp.32~37 (1985)
  28. 백유흠, "총담관담석의 내시경 제거 후 총담관담석 재발의 위험 인자", 대한소화기학회지, 54(1), pp.36~41 (2009), 대한소화기학회

관련 논문AI추천

Effect of stent placement on stone recurrence and post-procedural cholangitis after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones천영국, Jung-Hye Choi, Tae-Yoon Lee대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2021 · 제36권 제1호Recurrence of Bile Duct Stones after Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Combined with Limited Sphincterotomy: Long-Term Follow-Up Study김국현, 김태년, Jung Hyun Rhu거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2012 · 제6권 제1호The Efficacy of Early Scheduled Follow-Up Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography after Common Bile Duct Stone Removal구자설, 김창덕, 유호상, 이상우, 이홍식, 임형준, 정성우, 최재현, Jin Nam Kim거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2011 · 제5권 제1호Single-Stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction and Cholecystectomy during the Same HospitalizationAlan Kawarai Lefor, Hiroharu Shinozaki, Junji Furukawa, Kenji Kobayashi, Masaru Kimata, Satoshi Shinozaki, Toshiaki Terauchi, Yoshiro Ogata, Yuichi Sasakura대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2019 · 제52권 제1호The Role of Endoscopic Biliary Drainage without Sphincterotomy in Gallstone Patients with Cholangitis and Suspected Common Bile Duct Stones Not Detected by Cholangiogram or Intraductal Ultrasonography궁현정, 김민진, 문정호, 박상흠, 이윤나, 이태훈, 이혜경, 최문환, 최서연, 최현종거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2017 · 제11권 제3호Feasibility of Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation in Patients with Difficult Bile Duct Stones without Dilatation of the Lower Part of the Extrahepatic Bile DuctAkito Iwasaki, Atsushi Nakajima, Kensuke Kubota, Kentaro Sakamaki, Kunihiro Hosono, Nobuyuki Matsuhashi, Takamitsu Sato, Toshio Fujisawa, Yuji Fujita, Yusuke Sekino거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2017 · 제11권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)