Comparison of the clinical efficacy of cold snare polypectomy using a thin-wire snare and thick-wire snare for small colorectal polyps
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is an established technique for resecting small colorectal polyps without electrical current. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of thin-wire mini-snares and thick-wire mini-snares during CSP for small colorectal polyps. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 120 patients with colon polyps (5–8 mm in diameter) who underwent CSP between July and December 2017. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (thick-snare and thin-snare) according to the thickness of the snares. The complete resection rate (CRR), polyp characteristics, technical factors, and histopathologic features of resected specimens were carefully analysed. Results: In total, 137 eligible polyps were successfully resected using CSP (thin-snare group: n = 66, thick-snare group: n = 71). The location, size, morphology, and histologic findings of the polyps did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups. The CRR (thin-snare: 77.3% vs. thick-snare: 84.5%, P = 0.068), retrieval rate (100% in both groups), and the rates of tissue fly-away (P = 0.069), containing submucosal tissue (7.6% vs. 9.9%, P = 0.637), and intraprocedural or delayed polypectomy bleeding were not significantly different between the two groups. The CRR was significantly lower in sessile serrated lesions than in adenomas (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.57; P = 0.010). Conclusion: In conclusion, when performing CSP for small polyps, the snare thickness does not seem to have a significant effect on the clinical outcomes, including CRR and the occurrence of complications.
Abstract
Background: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is an established technique for resecting small colorectal polyps without electrical current. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of thin-wire mini-snares and thick-wire mini-snares during CSP for small colorectal polyps. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 120 patients with colon polyps (5–8 mm in diameter) who underwent CSP between July and December 2017. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (thick-snare and thin-snare) according to the thickness of the snares. The complete resection rate (CRR), polyp characteristics, technical factors, and histopathologic features of resected specimens were carefully analysed. Results: In total, 137 eligible polyps were successfully resected using CSP (thin-snare group: n = 66, thick-snare group: n = 71). The location, size, morphology, and histologic findings of the polyps did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups. The CRR (thin-snare: 77.3% vs. thick-snare: 84.5%, P = 0.068), retrieval rate (100% in both groups), and the rates of tissue fly-away (P = 0.069), containing submucosal tissue (7.6% vs. 9.9%, P = 0.637), and intraprocedural or delayed polypectomy bleeding were not significantly different between the two groups. The CRR was significantly lower in sessile serrated lesions than in adenomas (odds ratio, 0.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.12–0.57; P = 0.010). Conclusion: In conclusion, when performing CSP for small polyps, the snare thickness does not seem to have a significant effect on the clinical outcomes, including CRR and the occurrence of complications.
참고문헌 (22)
- Løberg M, "Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal", N Engl J Med, 371, pp.799~807 (2014)
- Winawer SJ, "Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup", N Engl J Med, 329, pp.1977~1981 (1993)
- Zauber AG, "Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths", N Engl J Med, 366, pp.687~696 (2012)
- Anderson R, "Causes of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers based on World Endoscopy Organization system of analysis", Gastroenterology, 158, pp.1287~1299 (2020)
- Belderbos TD, "Risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer due to incomplete adenoma resection : a nationwide, population-based cohort study", United European Gastroenterol J, 5, pp.440~447 (2017)
- Horiuchi A, "Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps", Gastrointest Endosc, 82, pp.686~692 (2015)
- Paspatis GA, "A prospective randomized comparison of cold vs hot snare polypectomy in the occurrence of postpolypectomy bleeding in small colonic polyps", Colorectal Dis, 13, pp.e345~e348 (2011)
- Kawamura T, "A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps : a multicentre randomised controlled trial(CRESCENT study)", Gut, 67, pp.1950~1957 (2018)
- Jegadeesan R, "Hot snare vs. cold snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of 4 - 10 mm colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies", Endosc Int Open, 7, pp.E708~E716 (2019)
- Kaltenbach T, "Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions-recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer", Gastroenterology, 158, pp.1095~1129 (2020)
- Ferlitsch M, "Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)Clinical Guideline", Endoscopy, 49, pp.270~297 (2017)
- Han Hee Lee, "Dedicated Cold Snare vs. Traditional Snare for Polypectomy of Diminutive and Small Lesions in a Porcine Model: A Research Group for Endoscopic Instruments and Stents (REIS) Study", Clinical Endoscopy, 54(3), pp.390~396 (2021), 대한소화기내시경학회[DOI]
- Din S, "Cold snare polypectomy : does snare type influence outcomes?", Dig Endosc, 27, pp.603~608 (2015)
- Dwyer JP, "A prospective comparison of cold snare polypectomy using traditional or dedicated cold snares for the resection of small sessile colorectal polyps", Endosc Int Open, 5, pp.E1062~E1068 (2017)
- Lee CK, "Cold snare polypectomy vs. Cold forceps polypectomy using double-biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps : a prospective randomized study", Am J Gastroenterol, 108, pp.1593~1600 (2013)
- Kim JS, "Cold snare polypectomy versus cold forceps polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps : a randomized controlled trial", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.741~747 (2015)
- Efthymiou M, "Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps", Endoscopy, 43, pp.312~316 (2011)
- Qu J, "Effectiveness and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy : a meta-analysis", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 34, pp.49~58 (2019)
- Sidhu M, "A randomized controlled trial of cold snare polypectomy technique : technique matters more than snare wire diameter", Am J Gastroenterol, 117, pp.100~ (2022)
- Pohl H, "Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy-results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study", Gastroenterology, 144, pp.74~80.e1 (2013)
- Abe Y, "Extended cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps increases the R0 resection rate", Endosc Int Open, 6, pp.E254~E258 (2018)
- Hewett DG, "Colonoscopic polypectomy : current techniques and controversies", Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 42, pp.443~458 (2013)