Colonoscopic Polypectomy Preferences of Asian Endoscopists: Results of a Survey-Based Study
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: The clinical practice pattern of polypectomy is not well-investigated in Asian countries. We aimed to survey Asian endoscopists about their preferred polypectomy techniques for given conditions and images of polyps. Methods: A survey was performed using questionnaires composed of two parts: a scenariobased questionnaire using scenarios of polyps, which were adopted from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, and an image-based questionnaire using provided endoscopic images of polyps. Results: A total of 154 endoscopists participated in this survey. The most preferred resection techniques for diminutive (≤5 mm), small (6–9 mm), and benign-looking intermediate (10–19 mm) nonpedunculated polyps were cold forceps polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), respectively, in both the scenario- and image-based questionnaires. For benign-looking large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were preferred in the scenario- and image-based surveys, respectively. In case of malignant nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and ESD were preferred for intermediate-sized and large lesions, respectively, according to the scenario-based survey. However, ESD was preferred in both intermediate-sized and large malignant nonpedunculated polyps according to the imagebased survey. Trainee endoscopists, endoscopists working in referral centers, and endoscopists in the colorectal cancer–prevalent countries were independently associated with preference of cold snare polypectomy for removing small polyps. Conclusions: The polypectomy practice patterns of Asian endoscopists vary, and cold snare polypectomy was not the most preferred resection method for polyps <10 mm in size, in contrast to recent guidelines.
Abstract
Background/Aims: The clinical practice pattern of polypectomy is not well-investigated in Asian countries. We aimed to survey Asian endoscopists about their preferred polypectomy techniques for given conditions and images of polyps. Methods: A survey was performed using questionnaires composed of two parts: a scenariobased questionnaire using scenarios of polyps, which were adopted from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines, and an image-based questionnaire using provided endoscopic images of polyps. Results: A total of 154 endoscopists participated in this survey. The most preferred resection techniques for diminutive (≤5 mm), small (6–9 mm), and benign-looking intermediate (10–19 mm) nonpedunculated polyps were cold forceps polypectomy, hot snare polypectomy, and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), respectively, in both the scenario- and image-based questionnaires. For benign-looking large (≥20 mm) nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were preferred in the scenario- and image-based surveys, respectively. In case of malignant nonpedunculated polyps, EMR and ESD were preferred for intermediate-sized and large lesions, respectively, according to the scenario-based survey. However, ESD was preferred in both intermediate-sized and large malignant nonpedunculated polyps according to the imagebased survey. Trainee endoscopists, endoscopists working in referral centers, and endoscopists in the colorectal cancer–prevalent countries were independently associated with preference of cold snare polypectomy for removing small polyps. Conclusions: The polypectomy practice patterns of Asian endoscopists vary, and cold snare polypectomy was not the most preferred resection method for polyps <10 mm in size, in contrast to recent guidelines.
참고문헌 (22)
- Zauber AG, "Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths", N Engl J Med, 366, pp.687~696 (2012)
- Ferlitsch M, "Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR) : European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE)Clinical Guideline", Endoscopy, 49, pp.270~297 (2017)
- Singh N, "A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists", Gastrointest Endosc, 60, pp.414~418 (2004)
- 신성재, "국내 대장폴립절제 시 치료 행태에 대한 설문조사", Intestinal research, 9(3), pp.196~205 (2011), 대한장연구학회
- Matsuda T, "Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of diminutive colorectal polyps", Dig Endosc, 26(Suppl 2), pp.104~108 (2014)
- Chandran S, "The current practice standard for colonoscopy in Australia", Gastrointest Endosc, 79, pp.473~479 (2014)
- Kaltenbach T, "Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions-recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer", Gastroenterology, 158, pp.1095~1129 (2020)
- "Global Cancer Observatory:Cancer Today" (2018)[URL]
- Efthymiou M, "Biopsy forceps is inadequate for the resection of diminutive polyps", Endoscopy, 43, pp.312~316 (2011)
- Draganov PV, "Randomized, controlled trial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps for polypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps", Gastrointest Endosc, 75, pp.118~126 (2012)
- Jung YS, "Complete biopsy resection of diminutive polyps", Endoscopy, 45, pp.1024~1029 (2013)
- Raad D, "Role of the cold biopsy technique in diminutive and small colonic polyp removal : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Gastrointest Endosc, 83, pp.508~515 (2016)
- Kawamura T, "A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9mm colorectal polyps : a multicentre randomized controlled trial(CRESCENT study)", Gut, 67, pp.1950~1957 (2018)
- Shinozaki S, "Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps : systematic review and meta-analysis", Dig Endosc, 30, pp.592~599 (2018)
- Ponugoti PL, "Risk of cancer in small and diminutive colorectal polyps", Dig Liver Dis, 49, pp.34~37 (2017)
- Lieberman D, "Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening : implications for CT colonography", Gastroenterology, 135, pp.1100~1105 (2008)
- Suzuki S, "Width and depth of resection for small colorectal polyps : hot versus cold snare polypectomy", Gastrointest Endosc, 87, pp.1095~1103 (2018)
- Yoshida N, "A diminutive T1 cancer 4 mm in size resected by cold snare polypectomy", Case Rep Gastroenterol, 12, pp.27~31 (2018)
- Takayanagi D, "Histological comparison of cold versus hot snare resections of the colorectal mucosa", Dis Colon Rectum, 61, pp.964~970 (2018)
- 김태준, "Current practices in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: a survey of indications among Korean endoscopists", Intestinal research, 15(2), pp.228~235 (2017), 대한장연구학회
- 장동경, "Current Status of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Korea", Clinical Endoscopy, 45(3), pp.288~289 (2012), 대한소화기내시경학회
- van Doorn SC, "Polyp morphology : an interobserver evaluation for the Paris classification among international experts", Am J Gastroenterol, 110, pp.180~187 (2015)