본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Speaker-specific Variability in Pre-/ɹ/ Retroflexion in L2 English

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

While lexicalized phonological processes tend to be rule-governed and yield categorical patterns, post-lexical processes result in a great deal of phonetic variability across speakers. Of our special interest is whether highly individualized patterns are acquired by L2 learners and how they are articulatorily manifested in L2 speech. Using ultrasound imaging of five Korean learners of English, the present study investigates the articulation of coronal stops followed by /ɹ/, known as /ɹ/- induced retroflexion, and examines the inter-speaker variation among L2 learners. Tongue contours produced by L2 speakers confirm highly individualized patterns across speakers, along with different degrees of retraction within and across morphemes and words. The gestural patterns offer new insights into covert articulatory patterns that emerge from L2 speakers, and add to the growing evidence of inter-speaker variation in L2 speech as well as in L1.

Abstract

While lexicalized phonological processes tend to be rule-governed and yield categorical patterns, post-lexical processes result in a great deal of phonetic variability across speakers. Of our special interest is whether highly individualized patterns are acquired by L2 learners and how they are articulatorily manifested in L2 speech. Using ultrasound imaging of five Korean learners of English, the present study investigates the articulation of coronal stops followed by /ɹ/, known as /ɹ/- induced retroflexion, and examines the inter-speaker variation among L2 learners. Tongue contours produced by L2 speakers confirm highly individualized patterns across speakers, along with different degrees of retraction within and across morphemes and words. The gestural patterns offer new insights into covert articulatory patterns that emerge from L2 speakers, and add to the growing evidence of inter-speaker variation in L2 speech as well as in L1.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. ARTICULATE INSTRUMENTS LTD, "Ultrasound Stabilization Headset Users Manual: Revision 1.4" (2008), Articulate Instruments Ltd
  2. ARTICULATE INSTRUMENTS LTDD, "Articulate Assistant Advanced User Guide:Version 2.14" (2012), Articulate Instruments Ltd
  3. BAKER, ADAM, "Variability in American English s-retraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem", Language Variation and Change, 23, pp.347~374 (2011)
  4. BHAT, D. N. S., "Retroflexion: An areal feature", Working Papers on Language Universals, 13, pp.27~67 (1973)
  5. BHAT, D. N. VS, "Retroflexion and retraction", Journal of Phonetics, 2, pp.233~237 (1974)
  6. BYUN, TARA MCALLISTER, "Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: Evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, pp.2116~2130 (2014)
  7. DAVIDSON, LISA, "Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance", The Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 120, pp.407~415 (2006)
  8. DERRICK, DONALD, "Individual variation in English flaps and taps : A case of categorical phonetics", Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 56, pp.307~319 (2011)
  9. GICK, BRYAN, "Phonology and Second Language Acquisition", pp.309~322 (2008), John Benjamins
  10. GU, CHONG, "Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models" (2002), Springer
  11. HAMANN, "Retroflexion and retraction revised", ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 28, pp.13~25 (2002)
  12. HAMANN, SILKE, "The Phonetics and Phonology of Retroflexes", PhD, pp.2003
  13. KOCHETOV, ALEXEI, "Spatial and dynamic aspects of retroflex production: An ultrasound and EMA study of Kannada geminate stops", Journal of Phonetics, 46, pp.168~184 (2014)
  14. LADEFOGED, PETER, "Non-quantal aspects of consonant production: A study of retroflex consonants", Journal of Phonetics, 11, pp.291~302 (1983)
  15. MIELKE, JEFF, "Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity : Evidence from bunched and retroflex", ɹ, Language, pp.2016, 92[DOI]
  16. SCHERTZ, JESSAMYN, "Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast", Journal of Phonetics, 52, pp.183~204 (2015)
  17. SMITH, BRIDGET, "Sound change and coarticulatory variability involving English", ɹ, Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, pp.2019, 4[DOI]
  18. SPENCER, ANDREW, "Phonology : Theory and Description" (1995), Wiley-Blackwell
  19. 성제현, "Retroflection or retraction? Phonetic variability in pre-rhotic coronal stops in English", 음성음운형태론연구, 26(3), pp.487~501 (2020), 한국음운론학회[DOI]
  20. WICKHAM, HADLEY, "ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis" (2016), Springer-Verlag
  21. WILSON, IAN, "Bilinguals use language-specific articulatory settings", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, pp.361~373 (2014)
  22. 윤관희, "Lexical and phonological effects on phonological variation in L2 English palatalization", 음성음운형태론연구, 18(2), pp.297~320 (2012), 한국음운론학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)