본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of R-mix Virus Culture and Multiplex Reverse Transcriptase-PCR for the Rapid Detection of Respiratory Viruses

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background : Respiratory viral infections can become epidemic due to high contagiosity. Since there was no rapid diagnostic method for complete diagnosis in the past, diagnosis was solely made on the basis of clinical symptoms or the time of infection. With recent developments in rapid diagnostic methods like multiplex reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR, R-mix virus culture, etc., early detection and effective treatment of respiratory viral infections is possible. Herein, we compared the efficiency of multiplex RT-PCR and the R-mix virus culture for the rapid detection of respiratory viruses. Methods : We used 96 nasopharyngeal swab specimens for culturing respiratory viruses using Rmix (Diagnostics Hybrids Inc., USA). Afterwards, multiplex RT-PCR was performed using specimens stored at -70℃. Results : R-mix virus culture yielded positive results in 34 cases (35.4%) and multiplex RT-PCR in 73 cases (76.0%). Both methods yielded identical results in 51 cases (29 positive cases and 22 negative cases). Among 45 cases that showed different results, 40 showed negative results in R-mix virus culture and positive results in multiplex RT-PCR, and 1 showed positive result in R-mix virus culture and negative result in multiplex RT-PCR. Different viruses were detected in the remaining 4 cases by both the methods. Conclusions : Multiplex RT-PCR provided faster results and had higher detection rates than R-mix virus culture. Further, unlike R-mix virus culture, multiplex RT-PCR can be used to identify new respiratory viruses. Therefore, multiplex RT-PCR is more useful than R-mix virus culture in the diagnosis of respiratory virus infection. (Korean J Lab Med 2010;30:289-94)

Abstract

Background : Respiratory viral infections can become epidemic due to high contagiosity. Since there was no rapid diagnostic method for complete diagnosis in the past, diagnosis was solely made on the basis of clinical symptoms or the time of infection. With recent developments in rapid diagnostic methods like multiplex reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR, R-mix virus culture, etc., early detection and effective treatment of respiratory viral infections is possible. Herein, we compared the efficiency of multiplex RT-PCR and the R-mix virus culture for the rapid detection of respiratory viruses. Methods : We used 96 nasopharyngeal swab specimens for culturing respiratory viruses using Rmix (Diagnostics Hybrids Inc., USA). Afterwards, multiplex RT-PCR was performed using specimens stored at -70℃. Results : R-mix virus culture yielded positive results in 34 cases (35.4%) and multiplex RT-PCR in 73 cases (76.0%). Both methods yielded identical results in 51 cases (29 positive cases and 22 negative cases). Among 45 cases that showed different results, 40 showed negative results in R-mix virus culture and positive results in multiplex RT-PCR, and 1 showed positive result in R-mix virus culture and negative result in multiplex RT-PCR. Different viruses were detected in the remaining 4 cases by both the methods. Conclusions : Multiplex RT-PCR provided faster results and had higher detection rates than R-mix virus culture. Further, unlike R-mix virus culture, multiplex RT-PCR can be used to identify new respiratory viruses. Therefore, multiplex RT-PCR is more useful than R-mix virus culture in the diagnosis of respiratory virus infection. (Korean J Lab Med 2010;30:289-94)

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Kim MR, "Epidemiology of acute viral respiratory tract infections in Korean children", J Infect, 41, pp.152~158 (2000)
  2. 김선형, "2004-2006년의 호흡기 바이러스 감염의 역학", The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 26(5), pp.351~357 (2006), 대한진단검사의학회
  3. Ginocchio CC, "Detection of respiratory viruses using non-molecular based methods", J Clin Virol, 40(S1), pp.S11~S14 (2007)
  4. Leland DS, "Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology", Clin Microbiol Rev, 20, pp.49~78 (2007)
  5. McPherson RA, "Henry’s Clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods. 21st ed", pp.975~984 (2007), Saunders
  6. Barenfanger J, "R-Mix cells are faster, at least as sensitive and marginally more costly than conventional cell lines for the detection of respiratory viruses", J Clin Virol, 22, pp.101~110 (2001)
  7. LaSala PR, "Prospective comparison of R-mix shell vial system with direct antigen tests and conventional cell culture for respiratory virus detection", J Clin Virol, 38, pp.210~216 (2007)
  8. St George K, "Rapid and sensitive detection of respiratory virus infections for directed antiviral treatment using R-Mix cultures", J Clin Virol, 24, pp.107~115 (2002)
  9. Mahony JB, "Detection of respiratory viruses by molecular methods", Clin Microbiol Rev, 21, pp.716~747 (2008)
  10. 유수진, "Dual Priming Oligonucleotide System을 이용한 다중 역전사 PCR 키트를 통한 12가지 호흡기 바이러스의 검출", The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 27(6), pp.420~427 (2007), 대한진단검사의학회
  11. Lin TY, "Surveillance of respiratory viral infections among pediatric outpatients in northern Taiwan", J Clin Virol, 30, pp.81~85 (2004)
  12. Maitreyi RS, "Rapid detection of respiratory viruses by centrifugation enhanced cultures from children with acute lower respiratory tract infections", J Clin Virol, 16, pp.41~47 (2000)
  13. Fauci AS, "Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 17th ed", pp.1120~1132 (2008), McGraw-Hill
  14. 안효섭, "소아과학. 9판", pp.629~653 (2008), 대한교과서
  15. Kim SR, "Rapid detection and identification of 12 res-piratory viruses using a dual priming oligonucleotide system-based multiplex PCR assay", J Virol Methods, 156, pp.111~116 (2009)
  16. 강정옥, "국내 의료기관의 호흡기바이러스 검사현황 및 5개 대학병원에서검출된 호흡기바이러스 역학", 대한임상미생물학회지, 10(2), pp.102~108 (2007), 대한임상미생물학회
  17. 윤귀현, "소아에서 다중 역전사효소 PCR법, 직접면역형광법, 쉘바이알배양법을 이용한 호흡기 바이러스의 검출", 대한임상미생물학회지, 12(3), pp.110~115 (2009), 대한임상미생물학회
  18. Roh KH, "Comparison of the Seeplex reverse transcription PCR assay with the R-mix viral culture and immunofluorescence techniques for detection of eight respiratory viruses", Ann Clin Lab Sci, 38, pp.41~46 (2008)
  19. 김금향, "하기도 감염으로 입원한 소아에서 12종 바이러스의 검출 및 임상 양상", Korean Journal of Pediatrics, 51(8), pp.834~841 (2008), 대한소아과학회
  20. Canducci F, "Two-year prospective study of single infections and coinfections by respiratory syncytial virus and viruses identified recently in infants with acute respiratory disease", J Med Virol, 80, pp.716~723 (2008)
  21. 성흥섭, "Rhinovirus, Human Metapneumovirus, Coronavirus 검출을 위한SeeplexTM RV Detection 키트의 평가", The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 28(2), pp.109~117 (2008), 대한진단검사의학회
  22. Fouchier RA, "Newer respiratory virus infections: human metapneumovirus, avian influenza virus, and human coronaviruses", Curr Opin Infect Dis, 18, pp.141~146 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

호흡기바이러스 검출을 위한 배양법, 직접면역형광법 및 다중역전사효소연쇄반응법의 비교윤귀현, 조지현대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2011 · 제1권 제4호Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-time PCR Assay for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Clinical Specimens김종완, 김태현, 박주원, 임인수대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2012 · 제32권 제6호Comparison of Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Nasopharyngeal Specimens김대원, 김민경, 변정현, 용동은, Jean Damascene Uwizeyimana대한임상미생물학회 · Annals of Clinical Microbiology2019 · 제22권 제2호사람호흡기바이러스검출에 대한 다중PCR과 단일PCR의 성능 비교김솔잎, 엄기원, 엄태현, 조종래대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2016 · 제6권 제4호Evaluation of the Efficacies of Rapid Antigen Test, Multiplex PCR, and Real-time PCR for the Detection of a Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Virus김경희, 이미애, 황유선대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2010 · 제30권 제2호Comparison of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel Fast v2 Assay With Anyplex II RV16 Detection Kit and AdvanSure RV Real-Time RT-PCR Assay for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses고대현, 김재석, 김한성, 김현수, 박경운, 송원근, 현정원대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2017 · 제37권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)