Evaluation of Various Formulae for Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation and Proposal of New Formulae for the Korean Population
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background : Some researchers have questioned the necessity of adjusting glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by body surface area (BSA). We compared the relationship between estimated GFR (eGFR) and radionuclide GFR (rGFR) with or without BSA adjustment by comparing the results obtained using various formulae with those obtained using 2 new proposed formulae. Methods : A retrospective study was performed using 204 Korean individuals whose GFR had been estimated by the 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid method between March 2004 and July 2008. We used the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) II formula, Mayo clinic quadratic (MCQ) formula, Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula, and lean body mass-adjusted CG formula. Two new formulae, skeletal muscle mass index (SMI)-adjusted CG formula and SMI×3.4/SCr, were proposed by us. We analyzed each parameter with Pearson’s correlation coefficient and also obtained the bias values. Results : BSA did not satisfy the fundamental prerequisites of an adjustment factor for rGFR. MDRD II and MCQ GFR estimates demonstrated higher Pearson’s correlation coefficient with BSA-unadjusted rGFR than they did with BSA-adjusted rGFR. The other GFR formulae estimates showed better correlation with rGFR and more favorable bias (P<0.001) when both GFR estimates and rGFR values were BSA-unadjusted. SMI-adjusted CG and SMI×3.4/SCr GFR estimates demonstrated correlation with rGFR and bias values similar to those of the MDRD II and CG GFR estimates. Conclusions : We suggest that absolute, non-corrected GFR and GFR estimate be preferred in daily practice. The absolute, non-corrected GFR and GFR estimate are considered helpful for patients with eGFR≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2. We also recommend the clinical use of the new formulae, SMIadjusted CG and SMI×3.4/SCr (BSA-unadjusted). (Korean J Lab Med 2010;30:606-15)
Abstract
Background : Some researchers have questioned the necessity of adjusting glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by body surface area (BSA). We compared the relationship between estimated GFR (eGFR) and radionuclide GFR (rGFR) with or without BSA adjustment by comparing the results obtained using various formulae with those obtained using 2 new proposed formulae. Methods : A retrospective study was performed using 204 Korean individuals whose GFR had been estimated by the 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid method between March 2004 and July 2008. We used the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) II formula, Mayo clinic quadratic (MCQ) formula, Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula, and lean body mass-adjusted CG formula. Two new formulae, skeletal muscle mass index (SMI)-adjusted CG formula and SMI×3.4/SCr, were proposed by us. We analyzed each parameter with Pearson’s correlation coefficient and also obtained the bias values. Results : BSA did not satisfy the fundamental prerequisites of an adjustment factor for rGFR. MDRD II and MCQ GFR estimates demonstrated higher Pearson’s correlation coefficient with BSA-unadjusted rGFR than they did with BSA-adjusted rGFR. The other GFR formulae estimates showed better correlation with rGFR and more favorable bias (P<0.001) when both GFR estimates and rGFR values were BSA-unadjusted. SMI-adjusted CG and SMI×3.4/SCr GFR estimates demonstrated correlation with rGFR and bias values similar to those of the MDRD II and CG GFR estimates. Conclusions : We suggest that absolute, non-corrected GFR and GFR estimate be preferred in daily practice. The absolute, non-corrected GFR and GFR estimate are considered helpful for patients with eGFR≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2. We also recommend the clinical use of the new formulae, SMIadjusted CG and SMI×3.4/SCr (BSA-unadjusted). (Korean J Lab Med 2010;30:606-15)
참고문헌 (25)
- Rule AD, "Measured and estimated GFR in healthy potential kidney donors", Am J Kidney Dis, 43, pp.112~119 (2004)
- Fleming JS, "Guidelines for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate using plasma sampling", Nucl Med Commun, 25, pp.759~769 (2004)
- Lamb E, "Kidney function tests in Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry and molecular diagnostics. 4th ed.", pp.818~826 (2006), Elsevier Saunders
- Delanaye P, "Indexing glomerular filtration rate for body surface area in obese patients is misleading: concept and example", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 20, pp.2024~2028 (2005)
- Lin J, "A comparison of prediction equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in adults without kidney disease", J Am Soc Nephrol, 14, pp.2573~2580 (2003)
- Bertolatus JA, "Evaluation of renal function in potential living kidney donors", Transplantation, 71, pp.256~260 (2001)
- Lewis J, "Comparison of cross-sectional renal function measurements in African Americans with hypertensive nephrosclerosis and of primary formulas to estimate glomerular filtration rate", Am J Kidney Dis, 38, pp.744~753 (2001)
- Levey AS, "A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group", Ann Intern Med, 130, pp.461~470 (1999)
- Bostom AG, "Predictive performance of renal function equations for patients with chronic kidney disease and normal serum creatinine levels", J Am Soc Nephrol, 13, pp.2140~2144 (2002)
- Kaizu Y, "Muscle mass index in haemodialysis patients: a comparison of indices obtained by routine clinical examinations", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 17, pp.442~448 (2002)
- -fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction, "Radiology", 1993, 847~850
- Spencer K, "Analytical reviews in clinical biochemistry: the estimation of creatinine", Ann Clin Biochem, 23(Pt 1), pp.1~25 (1986)
- Turner ST, "Fallacy of indexing renal and systemic hemodynamic measurements for body surface area", Am J Physiol, 268, pp.R978~R988 (1995)
- Watson WS, "Body surface area correction in single-sample methods of glomerular filtration rate estimation", Nucl Med Commun, 21, pp.121~122 (2000)
- Rigalleau V, "The Mayo Clinic quadratic equation improves the prediction of glomerular filtration rate in diabetic subjects", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 22, pp.813~818 (2007)
- Myers GL, "Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement:a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program", Clin Chem, 52, pp.5~18 (2006)
- Lim WH, "Lean body mass-adjusted Cockcroft and Gault formula improves the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in subjects with normal-range serum creatinine", Nephrology, 11, pp.250~256 (2006)
- 김윤희, "Cr51-EDTA GFR과 비교한 Cystatin C 근거 GFR 추정값 및Creatinine 근거 GFR 추정값의 정확도 및 정밀도 평가", The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 27(1), pp.34~39 (2007), 대한진단검사의학회
- Rule AD, "Limitations of estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine in the general population", Mayo Clin Proc, 81, pp.1427~1434 (2006)
- Tidman M, "A Comparison of GFR estimating formulae based upon s-cystatin C and s-creatinine and a combination of the two", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 23, pp.154~160 (2008)
- Zahran A, "Comparison between creatinine and cystatin C-based GFR equations in renal transplantation", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 22, pp.2659~2668 (2007)
- Virga G, "A new equation for estimating renal function using age, body weight and serum creatinine", Nephron Clin Pract, 105, pp.c43~c53 (2007)
- Poggio ED, "Performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cockcroft-Gault equations in the estimation of GFR in health and in chronic kidney disease", J Am Soc Nephrol, 16, pp.459~466 (2005)
- Froissart M, "Predictive performance of the modification of diet in renal disease and Cock croft-Gault equations for estimating renal function", J Am Soc Nephrol, 16, pp.763~773 (2005)
- Levey AS, "A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate", Ann Intern Med, 150, pp.604~612 (2009)