Accuracy Assessment of Five Equations Used for Estimating the Glomerular Filtration Rate in Korean Adults
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: We aimed to assess the performance of the five creatinine-based equations commonly used for estimates of the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), namely, the creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPIcr), Asian CKD-EPI, revised Lund–Malmö (revised LM), full age spectrum (FAS), and Korean FAS equations, in the Korean population. Methods: A total of 1,312 patients, aged 20 yr and above who underwent 51Cr-EDTA GFR measurements (mGFR), were enrolled. The bias (eGFR–mGFR) and precision (root mean square error [RMSE]) were calculated. The accuracy (P30) of four eGFR equations was compared to that of the CKD-EPIcr equation. P30 was defined as the percentage of patients whose eGFR was within±30% of the mGFR. Results: The mean bias (mL·min-1·1.73 m-2) of the five eGFR equation was as follows: CKD-EPIcr, –0.6; Asian CKD-EPI, 2.7; revised LM, –6.5; FAS, –2.5; and Korean FAS, –0.2. The bias of the Asian CKD-EPI, revised LM, and FAS equations showed a significant difference from zero (P<0.001). The RMSE values were as follows: CKD-EPIcr, 15.6; Asian CKD-EPI, 15.6; revised LM, 17.9; FAS, 16.3; and Korean FAS, 15.8. There were no significant differences in the P30 except for the Asian CKD-EPI equation: CKD-EPIcr, 76.6%; Asian CKD-EPI, 74.7%; revised LM, 75.8%; FAS, 76.0%; and Korean FAS, 75.8%. Conclusions: The CKD-EPIcr and Korean FAS equations showed equivalent analytical and clinical performances in the Korean adult population.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to assess the performance of the five creatinine-based equations commonly used for estimates of the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), namely, the creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPIcr), Asian CKD-EPI, revised Lund–Malmö (revised LM), full age spectrum (FAS), and Korean FAS equations, in the Korean population. Methods: A total of 1,312 patients, aged 20 yr and above who underwent 51Cr-EDTA GFR measurements (mGFR), were enrolled. The bias (eGFR–mGFR) and precision (root mean square error [RMSE]) were calculated. The accuracy (P30) of four eGFR equations was compared to that of the CKD-EPIcr equation. P30 was defined as the percentage of patients whose eGFR was within±30% of the mGFR. Results: The mean bias (mL·min-1·1.73 m-2) of the five eGFR equation was as follows: CKD-EPIcr, –0.6; Asian CKD-EPI, 2.7; revised LM, –6.5; FAS, –2.5; and Korean FAS, –0.2. The bias of the Asian CKD-EPI, revised LM, and FAS equations showed a significant difference from zero (P<0.001). The RMSE values were as follows: CKD-EPIcr, 15.6; Asian CKD-EPI, 15.6; revised LM, 17.9; FAS, 16.3; and Korean FAS, 15.8. There were no significant differences in the P30 except for the Asian CKD-EPI equation: CKD-EPIcr, 76.6%; Asian CKD-EPI, 74.7%; revised LM, 75.8%; FAS, 76.0%; and Korean FAS, 75.8%. Conclusions: The CKD-EPIcr and Korean FAS equations showed equivalent analytical and clinical performances in the Korean adult population.
참고문헌 (16)
- National Kidney Foundation, "K", DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification, 2002, pp.39(2S1), S1~S266
- Levey LS, "A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate", Ann Intern Med, 150, pp.604~612 (2009)
- Inker LA, "KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of CKD", Am J Kidney Dis, 63, pp.713~735 (2014)
- Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group, "KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease", Kidney Int Suppl (2011), 3, pp.1~150 (2013)
- Nyman U, "The revised Lund-Malmö GFR estimating equation outperforms MDRD and CKD-EPI across GFR, age and BMI intervals in a large Swedish population", Clin Chem Lab Med, 52, pp.815~824 (2014)
- Björk J, "Revised equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate based on the Lund-Malmö Study cohort", Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 71, pp.232~239 (2011)
- Pottel H, "An estimated glomerular filtration rate equation for the full age spectrum", Nephrol Dial Transplant, 31, pp.798~806 (2016)
- Earley A, "Estimating equations for glomerular filtration rate in the era of creatinine standardization: a systematic review", Ann Intern Med, 156, pp.785~795 (2012)
- Misuk Ji, "Comparing Results of Five Glomerular Filtration Rate-Estimating Equations in the Korean General Population: MDRD Study, Revised Lund-Malmӧ, and Three CKD-EPI Equations", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 36(6), pp.521~528 (2016), 대한진단검사의학회
- CLSI, "Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory. Approved Guideline-Third Edition. CLSI document EP28-A3c", Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, ~ (2008)
- Jeong TD, "Development and validation of the Korean version of CKD-EPI equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate", Clin Biochem, 49, pp.713~719 (2016)
- Stevens LA, "Evaluation of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation for estimating the glomerular filtration rate in multiple ethnicities", Kidney Int, 79, pp.555~562 (2011)
- A proposal for strength-of-agreement criteria for Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient, "McBride GB", NIWA, ~, pp.HAM2005-062 (2005)
- Delanaye P, "Estimating glomerular filtration rate in Asian subjects: where do we stand?", Kidney Int, 80, pp.439~440 (2011)
- Björk J, "Performance of GFR estimating equations stratified by measured or estimated GFR: Implications for interpretation", Am J Kidney Dis, 66, pp.1107~1108 (2015)
- Björk J, "Accuracy of GFR estimating equations combining standardized cystatin C and creatinine assays: a cross-sectional study in Sweden", Clin Chem Lab Med, 53, pp.403~414 (2015)