A histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. One of the major keys to achieve successful osseointegration of the implant is its surface properties. The aim of this study was to investigate the bone response to dental implants with different surface characteristics using the rabbit tibia model. Tricalcium phosphate (TCP) coated, anodic oxidized and turned (control) surfaces were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy two implants were placed in the tibia of eighteen rabbits. Nine rabbits were sacrificed at 3 weeks of healing and the remaining nine were sacrificed at 6 weeks of healing. The bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and the bone volume density (BVD) were assessed by light microscope after 3 and 6 weeks of healing. RESULTS. Statistical analysis showed that no significant differences in the BIC and BVD were observed between the different implant surfaces and the control group at 3 weeks and 6 weeks of healing. Data also suggested that the BVD of all the surfaces showed significant difference at 3 and 6 weeks. CONCLUSION. The present study has showed that osseointegration occurred in all investigated types of surface-treated implants. In the current study all of the threads of the implants were observed to calculate BIC and BVD values (instead of choosing some of the threads from the bone cortex for example), which didn’t make BIC or BVD percentage values better than in the control group, therefore the clinical relevance of these results remains to be shown.
Abstract
PURPOSE. One of the major keys to achieve successful osseointegration of the implant is its surface properties. The aim of this study was to investigate the bone response to dental implants with different surface characteristics using the rabbit tibia model. Tricalcium phosphate (TCP) coated, anodic oxidized and turned (control) surfaces were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Seventy two implants were placed in the tibia of eighteen rabbits. Nine rabbits were sacrificed at 3 weeks of healing and the remaining nine were sacrificed at 6 weeks of healing. The bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and the bone volume density (BVD) were assessed by light microscope after 3 and 6 weeks of healing. RESULTS. Statistical analysis showed that no significant differences in the BIC and BVD were observed between the different implant surfaces and the control group at 3 weeks and 6 weeks of healing. Data also suggested that the BVD of all the surfaces showed significant difference at 3 and 6 weeks. CONCLUSION. The present study has showed that osseointegration occurred in all investigated types of surface-treated implants. In the current study all of the threads of the implants were observed to calculate BIC and BVD values (instead of choosing some of the threads from the bone cortex for example), which didn’t make BIC or BVD percentage values better than in the control group, therefore the clinical relevance of these results remains to be shown.
참고문헌 (31)
- Albrektsson T, "Osseointegrated titanium implants.Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting,direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man", Acta Orthop Scand, 52, pp.155~170 (1981)
- Kasemo B, "Surface science aspects on inorganic biomaterials", CRC Crit Rev Clin Neurobiol, 4, pp.335~380 (1986)
- Kim YH, "A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, pp.349~356 (2003)
- Pilliar RM, "Overview of surface variability of metallic endosseous dental implants:textured and porous surface-structured designs", Implant Dent, 7, pp.305~314 (1998)
- Cooper LF, "A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants", J Prosthet Dent, 84, pp.522~534 (2000)
- Masuda T, "Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration.Part I.In vivo studies", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.17~29 (1998)
- Kieswetter K, "Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells", J Biomed Mater Res, 32, pp.55~63 (1996)
- Larsson C, "Bone response to surface modified titanium implants:studies on electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses and morphology", Biomaterials, 15, pp.1062~1074 (1994)
- Yeo IS, "Biomechanical and histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics", J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 87, pp.303~311 (2008)
- Bowers KT, "Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.302~310 (1992)
- Schwartz Z, "Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation,matrix production,and differentiation depends on the state of cell maturation", J Biomed Mater Res, 30, pp.145~55 (1996)
- Martin JY, "Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation,differentiation,and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells(MG63)", J Biomed Mater Res, 29, pp.389~401 (1995)
- Sun L, "Material fundamentals and clinical performance of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings:a review", J Biomed Mater Res, 58, pp.570~592 (2001)
- Park EK, "Cellular biocompatibility and stimulatory effects of calcium metaphosphate on osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived stromal cells", Biomaterials, 25, pp.3403~11 (2004)
- Fini M, "In vitro and in vivo behaviour of Ca-and P-enriched anodized titanium", Biomaterials, 20, pp.1587~1594 (1999)
- Sykaras N, "Implant materials,designs,and surface topographies:their effect on osseointegration.A literature review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.675~690 (2000)
- Ellingsen JE, "Surface configurations of dental implants", Periodontol 2000, 17, pp.36~46 (1998)
- Larsson C, "Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants:studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses", Biomaterials, 17, pp.605~616 (1996)
- Donath K, "A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues.The Sa¨ge-Schliff(sawing and grinding)technique", J Oral Pathol, 11, pp.318~326 (1982)
- Meredith N, "Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.491~501 (1998)
- Larsson C, "Bone response to surface modified titanium implants-studies on the tissue response after 1 year to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 8, pp.721~729 (1997)
- Ducheyne P, "Effect of calcium phosphate coating characteristics on early post-operative bone tissue ingrowth", Biomaterials, 11, pp.531~540 (1990)
- Chae JC, "Enhanced ingrowth of porous-coated CoCr implants plasmasprayed with tricalcium phosphate", J Biomed Mater Res, 26, pp.93~102 (1992)
- Schopper C, "The effect of three different calcium phosphate implant coatings on bone deposition and coating resorption:a long-term histological study in sheep", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.357~368 (2005)
- Clemens JA, "Healing of gaps around calcium phosphate-coated im-plants in trabecular bone of the goat", J Biomed Mater Res, 36, pp.55~64 (1997)
- Lee TM, "Comparison of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and hydroxyapatite", tricalcium phosphate composite coatings:in vivo study, 2001, pp.55, 360~367
- Geesink RS, "Bonding of bone to apatitecoated implants", J Bone Joint Surg, 70B, pp.17~22 (1988)
- Sennerby L, "Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone.part 1.Light microscopic observations", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 4, pp.240~50 (1993)
- Sennerby L, "A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.62~71 (1992)
- Biesbrock AR, "Evaluation of the clinical predictability of hydroxyapatite-coated endosseous dental implants:a review of the literature", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.712~720 (1995)
- Schliephake H, "Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.738~746 (2006)