Implant-supported overdentures with different bar designs: A retrospective evaluation after 5-19 years of clinical function
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. This retrospective study evaluated the outcome of implant-retained overdentures (IODs) after 5-19 years of clinical function. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective analysis of patient files was performed referring to 27 patients who received 36 IODs with 3 different bar designs (group A=prefabricated round bars, n=7; group B=one-piece anterior milled bars, n=20; and group C=two bilaterally placed milled bars, n=9) in the mandible (n=24) and/or in the maxilla (n=12). The analysis focused on the survival and success rates (according to Kaplan-Meier) of the implants and prostheses. Technical complication rates for each type of restoration were analyzed and compared via one-way ANOVA and the Chi-squared test. The prevalence of peri-implantitis (radiographic bone loss ≥3.5 mm) was evaluated by digital analysis of panoramic radiographs taken postoperative (baseline) and after 5-19 years of clinical function (follow-up). RESULTS. The mean observational time was 7.3 years. The survival rates of the prostheses and implants were 100% and 97.7%, respectively. Technical complications occurred more frequently in group A (mean: 3.5 during observational time) than in the other two groups (B: 0.8; C: 1.0). However, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.58). Peri-implantitis was diagnosed for 12.4% of the implants in 37% of the patients. CONCLUSION. Bar-retained IODs are an adequate treatment option for edentulous jaws. These restorations may exhibit high implant/prosthesis survival rates (>97%), and a limited incidence of technical complications after a mean observational period of >7 years. Nevertheless, peri-implantitis was identified as a frequent and serious biological complication for this type of reconstruction.
Abstract
PURPOSE. This retrospective study evaluated the outcome of implant-retained overdentures (IODs) after 5-19 years of clinical function. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective analysis of patient files was performed referring to 27 patients who received 36 IODs with 3 different bar designs (group A=prefabricated round bars, n=7; group B=one-piece anterior milled bars, n=20; and group C=two bilaterally placed milled bars, n=9) in the mandible (n=24) and/or in the maxilla (n=12). The analysis focused on the survival and success rates (according to Kaplan-Meier) of the implants and prostheses. Technical complication rates for each type of restoration were analyzed and compared via one-way ANOVA and the Chi-squared test. The prevalence of peri-implantitis (radiographic bone loss ≥3.5 mm) was evaluated by digital analysis of panoramic radiographs taken postoperative (baseline) and after 5-19 years of clinical function (follow-up). RESULTS. The mean observational time was 7.3 years. The survival rates of the prostheses and implants were 100% and 97.7%, respectively. Technical complications occurred more frequently in group A (mean: 3.5 during observational time) than in the other two groups (B: 0.8; C: 1.0). However, this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.58). Peri-implantitis was diagnosed for 12.4% of the implants in 37% of the patients. CONCLUSION. Bar-retained IODs are an adequate treatment option for edentulous jaws. These restorations may exhibit high implant/prosthesis survival rates (>97%), and a limited incidence of technical complications after a mean observational period of >7 years. Nevertheless, peri-implantitis was identified as a frequent and serious biological complication for this type of reconstruction.
참고문헌 (15)
- Krennmair G, "The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants:a 5-year prospective study", Int J Prosthodont, 21, pp.514~520 (2008)
- Krennmair G, "Removable implant-supported maxillary prostheses anchored on milled bars: a retrospective evaluation of two concepts", Int J Prosthodont, 22, pp.576~578 (2009)
- Andreiotelli M, "Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review", Int J Prosthodont, 23, pp.195~203 (2010)
- Brosky ME, "The anterior cantilever in the implant-supported screw-retained mandibular prosthesis", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.244~249 (2003)
- Krennmair G, "Implantsupported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.987~994 (2007)
- Krennmair G, "Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.481~488 (2012)
- Meijer HJ, "Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.722~728 (2009)
- Ueda T, "Long-term results of mandibular implants supporting an overdenture:implant survival, failures, and crestal bone level changes", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.365~372 (2011)
- Rinke S, "Technical and biological complications of single-molar implant restorations", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.1024~1030 (2015)
- Frisch E, "Double crown-retained maxillary overdentures: 5-year follow-up", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 17, pp.22~31 (2015)
- Abd El-Dayem MA, "Comparison of prefabricated and custommade bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures", Implant Dent, 18, pp.501~511 (2009)
- Cehreli MC, "A systematic review of marginal bone loss around implants retaining or supporting overdentures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.266~277 (2010)
- Rinke S, "Prevalence of periimplant disease in partially edentulous patients: a practice-based cross-sectional study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.826~833 (2011)
- Bressan E, "Implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a cross-sectional study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.814~819 (2012)
- Heschl A, "Overdentures in the edentulous mandible supported by implants and retained by a Dolder bar: a 5-year prospective study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 15, pp.589~599 (2013)