Effect of alginate chemical disinfection on bacterial count over gypsum cast
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To evaluate the efficacy of sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) and iodophor disinfectants on alginate impressions along with their effect on the survived bacterium count on the gypsum cast. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four alginate impression on each dentate patients were made, of which Group I were not washed or disinfected, Group II impressions were merely washed with water, Group III were disinfected by spraying with sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10), Group IV were disinfected with iodophor (1 : 213). Gypsum cast (type III) were made from all the impression. Impressions and gypsum cast were swabbed in mid palatal region for bacterial culture. Bacterial colony counting done after 3 days of incubation at 37℃ in blood agar media. The data obtained was analyzed by one way ANOVA test at a significant difference level of 0.05. RESULTS. Group I and Group II showed significantly more bacteria compared to Group III and Group IV. Bacterial colonies on the alginate impression and gypsum cast in group disinfected with Sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) were 0.18, 0.82 respectively compared to group treated with iodophor (1 : 213). There was an increase in bacterial count on dental cast compared to source alginate impressions. CONCLUSION. Sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) was found to be better disinfectant for alginate impression. There was an indication of increase in number of bacteria from alginate impression to making of dental cast. Additional gypsum cast disinfectant procedures need to be encouraged to completely eliminate cross infection to dental laboratory.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To evaluate the efficacy of sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) and iodophor disinfectants on alginate impressions along with their effect on the survived bacterium count on the gypsum cast. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four alginate impression on each dentate patients were made, of which Group I were not washed or disinfected, Group II impressions were merely washed with water, Group III were disinfected by spraying with sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10), Group IV were disinfected with iodophor (1 : 213). Gypsum cast (type III) were made from all the impression. Impressions and gypsum cast were swabbed in mid palatal region for bacterial culture. Bacterial colony counting done after 3 days of incubation at 37℃ in blood agar media. The data obtained was analyzed by one way ANOVA test at a significant difference level of 0.05. RESULTS. Group I and Group II showed significantly more bacteria compared to Group III and Group IV. Bacterial colonies on the alginate impression and gypsum cast in group disinfected with Sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) were 0.18, 0.82 respectively compared to group treated with iodophor (1 : 213). There was an increase in bacterial count on dental cast compared to source alginate impressions. CONCLUSION. Sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) was found to be better disinfectant for alginate impression. There was an indication of increase in number of bacteria from alginate impression to making of dental cast. Additional gypsum cast disinfectant procedures need to be encouraged to completely eliminate cross infection to dental laboratory.
참고문헌 (17)
- Connor C., "Cross-contamination control in prosthodontic practice", Int J Prosthodont, 4, pp.337~344 (1991)
- Leung RL, "Gypsum casts as a potential source of microbial cross-contamination", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.210~211 (1983)
- Kugel G, "Disinfection and communication practices: a survey of U.S. dental laboratories", J Am Dent Assoc, 131, pp.786~792 (2000)
- Almortadi N, "Disinfection of dental impressions- compliance to accepted standards", Br Dent J, 209, pp.607~611 (2010)
- Powell GL, "The presence and identification of organisms transmitted to dental laboratories", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.235~237 (1990)
- Samaranayake LP, "Carriage of oral flora on irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.244~249 (1991)
- Jagger DC, "The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy of some impression materials", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 12, pp.154~160 (2004)
- Martin N, "The dimensional stability of dental impression materials following immersion in disinfecting solutions", Dent Mater, 23, pp.760~768 (2007)
- Taylor RL, "Disinfection procedures: their effect on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and gypsum casts", Dent Mater, 18, pp.103~110 (2002)
- Westerholm HS 2nd, "Efficacy of various spray disinfectants on irreversible hydrocolloid impressions", Int J Prosthodont, 5, pp.47~54 (1992)
- Bergman B, "Disinfection of prosthodontic impression materials: a literature review", Int J Prosthodont, 2, pp.537~542 (1989)
- Wakefield CW, "Laboratory contamination of dental prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 44, pp.143~146 (1980)
- Jagger DC, "Cross-infection control in dental laboratories", Br Dent J, 179, pp.93~96 (1995)
- Jennings KJ, "The persistence of microorganisms on impression materials following disinfection", Int J Prosthodont, 4, pp.382~387 (1991)
- Rentzia A, "Disinfection procedures: their efficacy and effect on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material", J Dent, 39, pp.133~140 (2011)
- Look JO, "Preliminary results from disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.701~707 (1990)
- Infection control recommendations for the dental office and the dental laboratory, "ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and ADA Council on Dental Practice", J Am Dent Assoc, 127, pp.672~680 (1996)