본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A comparative study to measure the condylar guidance by the radiographic and clinical methods

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. The study was conducted to compare the radiographic and clinical methods of measuring the horizontal condylar guidance (HCG) values. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The condylar guidance was measured using the radiographic (CT scan) and three clinical methods i.e. the wax protrusive records, Lucia jig record and intraoral central bearing device in 12 patients aged between 20-40 years irrespective of sex. The records were taken and transferred on the semi-adjustable articulator to record the HCG values. The CT scan was taken for 3D reconstruction of the mid facial region. Frankfort horizontal plane (FHP) and a line extending from the superior anterior most point on the glenoid fossa to the most convex point on the apex of articular eminence (AE) was marked on the CT scan. An angle between these two lines was measured on both right and left sides to obtain condylar inclination angle. Three interocclusal protrusive wax and jig records were taken and transferred to the semi adjustable articulator. Three readings were recorded on each side. Similarly the records were taken and transferred to the same articulator using the intra oral central bearing device to record the readings. RESULTS. The statistical analysis showed insignificant differences in the HCG values between the right and left sides [(P=.589 (CT), P=.928 (wax), P=.625 (jig), P=.886 (tracer)]. The clinical methods provided low Pearsons correlation values [(R = 0.423 (wax), R = 0.354 (jig), R = 0.265 (tracer)] for the right as well as the left sides when compared with the CT values. Among the clinical methods, jig and wax method showed strong level of association which is statistically significant while the intra-oral tracer showed weak association with the other two methods. CONCLUSION. The right and left HCG values were almost similar. The CT scan showed higher HCG values than the clinical methods and among the clinical methods, values obtained from all the methods were comparable.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The study was conducted to compare the radiographic and clinical methods of measuring the horizontal condylar guidance (HCG) values. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The condylar guidance was measured using the radiographic (CT scan) and three clinical methods i.e. the wax protrusive records, Lucia jig record and intraoral central bearing device in 12 patients aged between 20-40 years irrespective of sex. The records were taken and transferred on the semi-adjustable articulator to record the HCG values. The CT scan was taken for 3D reconstruction of the mid facial region. Frankfort horizontal plane (FHP) and a line extending from the superior anterior most point on the glenoid fossa to the most convex point on the apex of articular eminence (AE) was marked on the CT scan. An angle between these two lines was measured on both right and left sides to obtain condylar inclination angle. Three interocclusal protrusive wax and jig records were taken and transferred to the semi adjustable articulator. Three readings were recorded on each side. Similarly the records were taken and transferred to the same articulator using the intra oral central bearing device to record the readings. RESULTS. The statistical analysis showed insignificant differences in the HCG values between the right and left sides [(P=.589 (CT), P=.928 (wax), P=.625 (jig), P=.886 (tracer)]. The clinical methods provided low Pearsons correlation values [(R = 0.423 (wax), R = 0.354 (jig), R = 0.265 (tracer)] for the right as well as the left sides when compared with the CT values. Among the clinical methods, jig and wax method showed strong level of association which is statistically significant while the intra-oral tracer showed weak association with the other two methods. CONCLUSION. The right and left HCG values were almost similar. The CT scan showed higher HCG values than the clinical methods and among the clinical methods, values obtained from all the methods were comparable.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Zamacona JM, "Study of the sagittal condylar path in edentulous patients", J Prosthet Dent, 68, pp.314~317 (1992)
  2. "The glossary of prosthodontic terms", J Prosthet Dent, 94, pp.10~92 (2005)
  3. Pelletier LB, "Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study", J Prosthet Dent, 66, pp.193~200 (1991)
  4. Posselt U, "Physiology of occlusion and rehabilitation. 2nd ed", pp.121~132 (1968), Blackwell Science
  5. Mohl ND, "A textbook of occlusion", pp.139~140 (1988), Quintessence
  6. Zarb GA, "Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients: complete dentures and implant- supported prostheses. 12th ed", pp.294~ (2004), Mosby
  7. Rosenstiel SF, "Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4thed", pp.71~ (2006), Mosby
  8. Hickey JC, "Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 9th ed", pp.415~ (1985), CV Mosby
  9. Gross M, "Comparative study of condylar settings of three semiadjustable articulators", Int J Prosthodont, 3, pp.135~141 (1990)
  10. Gross M, "The effect of three different recording materials on the reproducibility of condylar guidance registrations in three semi-adjustable articulators", J Oral Rehabil, 25, pp.204~208 (1998)
  11. dos Santos Ju′nior J, "Geometric analysis of occlusal plane orientation using simulated ear-rod facebow transfer", J Prosthodont, 5, pp.172~181 (1996)
  12. Christensen LV, "The concept of the sagittal condylar guidance: biological fact or fallacy?", J Oral Rehabil, 5, pp.1~7 (1978)
  13. Gilboa I, "Condylar guidance: correlation between articular morphology and panoramic radiographic images in dry human skulls", J Prosthet Dent, 99, pp.477~482 (2008)
  14. el-Gheriani AS, "Graphic tracings of condylar paths and measurements of condylar angles", J Prosthet Dent, 61, pp.77~87 (1989)
  15. Brewka RE, "Pantographic evaluation of cephalometric hinge axis", Am J Orthod, 79, pp.1~19 (1981)
  16. Posselt U, "Registration of the condyle path inclination: variations using the Gysi technique", J Prosthet Dent, 10, pp.243~247 (1960)
  17. Donegan SJ, "Sagittal condylar guidance as determined by protrusion records and wear facets of teeth", Int J Prosthodont, 4, pp.469~472 (1991)
  18. Price RB, "Effects of changes in articulator settings on generated occlusal tracings. Part I: Condylar inclination and progressive side shift settings", J Prosthet Dent, 65, pp.237~243 (1991)
  19. Ratzmann A, "Comparative clinical investigation of horizontal condylar inclination using the JMA electronic recording system and a protrusive wax record for setting articulators", Int J Comput Dent, 10, pp.265~284 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

Correlation between sagittal condylar guidance angles obtained using radiographic and protrusive occlusal record methods권오균, 김지환, 양승원대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2017 · 제9권 제4호A comparative study to measure the sagittal condylar inclination using mechanical articulator, virtual articulator and jaw tracking deviceFei Liu, Jiansong Mei, Jiarui Chao, Jiefei Shen, Liya Ma, Zhenyu Wang대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2023 · 제15권 제1호Comparison of condylar displacement between three biotypological facial groups by using mounted models and a mandibular position indicatorAfonso Pinhão Ferreira, Jorge Dias Lopes, José Pedro Tavares, Maria João Ponces대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2014 · 제44권 제6호Impact of digital jaw tracking systems on dynamic occlusal surface morphology and condylar inclination measurementsAlper Aktosun, Ayşenur Özcan-Sezgin, Berk Bilgen, Sina Saygılı, Tonguç Sülün대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2025 · 제17권 제4호The influence of horizontal cephalic rotation on the deviation of mandibular positionFumi Mizuhashi, Kaoru Koide, Katsuyoshi Koide, Naoto Katayama대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2018 · 제10권 제6호Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography studyHyoung-Seon Baik, Kyoung Jin Noh, Sang-Sun Han, Woowon Jang, Yoon Jeong Choi대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2021 · 제51권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)