Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the following null hypothesis: there are no differences in the morphology of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) structures in relation to vertical and sagittal cephalometric patterns. Methods: This retrospective study was performed with 131 participants showing no TMJ symptoms. The participants were divided into Class I, II, and III groups on the basis of their sagittal cephalometric relationships and into hyperdivergent, normodivergent, and hypodivergent groups on the basis of their vertical cephalometric relationships. The following measurements were performed using cone-beam computed tomography images and compared among the groups: condylar volume, condylar size (width, length, and height), fossa size (length and height), and condyle-to-fossa joint spaces at the anterior, superior, and posterior condylar poles. Results: The null hypothesis was rejected. The Class III group showed larger values for condylar width, condylar height, and fossa height than the Class II group (p < 0.05). Condylar volume and superior joint space in the hyperdivergent group were significantly smaller than those in the other two vertical groups (p < 0.001), whereas fossa length and height were significantly larger in the hyperdivergent group than in the other groups (p < 0.01). The hypodivergent group showed a greater condylar width than the hyperdivergent group (p < 0.01). The sagittal and vertical cephalometric patterns showed statistically significant interactions for fossa length and height. Conclusions: TMJ morphology differed across diverse skeletal cephalometric patterns. The fossa length and height were affected by the interactions of the vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the following null hypothesis: there are no differences in the morphology of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) structures in relation to vertical and sagittal cephalometric patterns. Methods: This retrospective study was performed with 131 participants showing no TMJ symptoms. The participants were divided into Class I, II, and III groups on the basis of their sagittal cephalometric relationships and into hyperdivergent, normodivergent, and hypodivergent groups on the basis of their vertical cephalometric relationships. The following measurements were performed using cone-beam computed tomography images and compared among the groups: condylar volume, condylar size (width, length, and height), fossa size (length and height), and condyle-to-fossa joint spaces at the anterior, superior, and posterior condylar poles. Results: The null hypothesis was rejected. The Class III group showed larger values for condylar width, condylar height, and fossa height than the Class II group (p < 0.05). Condylar volume and superior joint space in the hyperdivergent group were significantly smaller than those in the other two vertical groups (p < 0.001), whereas fossa length and height were significantly larger in the hyperdivergent group than in the other groups (p < 0.01). The hypodivergent group showed a greater condylar width than the hyperdivergent group (p < 0.01). The sagittal and vertical cephalometric patterns showed statistically significant interactions for fossa length and height. Conclusions: TMJ morphology differed across diverse skeletal cephalometric patterns. The fossa length and height were affected by the interactions of the vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns.
참고문헌 (30)
- Krisjane Z, "Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion", Stomatologija, 9, pp.67~71 (2007)
- Tecco S, "Condylar volume and surface in Caucasian young adult subjects", BMC Med Imaging, 10, pp.28~ (2010)
- Katsavrias EG, "Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusions", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.470~478 (2006)
- Katsavrias EG, "Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns : a morphometric tomographic study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, pp.337~346 (2005)
- Krisjane Z, "Threedimensional evaluation of TMJ parameters in Class II and Class III patients", Stomatologija, 11, pp.32~36 (2009)
- In-Young Park, "Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography based comparison of condylar position and morphology according to the vertical skeletal pattern", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(2), pp.66~73 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
- Saccucci M, "Condylar volume and condylar area in class I, class II and class III young adult subjects", Head Face Med, 8, pp.34~ (2012)
- Saccucci M, "Do skeletal cephalometric characteristics correlate with condylar volume, surface and shape? A 3D analysis", Head Face Med, 8, pp.15~ (2012)
- Vitral RW, "Computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint alterations in patients with class II division 1 subdivision malocclusions : condyle-fossa relationship", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, pp.48~52 (2004)
- Kurita H, "A long-term follow-up study of radiographically evident degenerative changes in the temporomandibular joint with different conditions of disk displacement", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 35, pp.49~54 (2006)
- Sümbüllü MA, "Radiological examination of the articular eminence morphology using cone beam CT", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 41, pp.234~240 (2012)
- Yamada K, "Morphology of the articular eminence in temporomandibular joints and condylar bone change", J Oral Rehabil, 31, pp.438~444 (2004)
- Hasegawa H, "Condylar shape in relation to anterior disk displacement in juvenile females", Cranio, 29, pp.100~110 (2011)
- Paknahad M, "Is mandibular fossa morphology and articular eminence inclination associated with temporomandibular dysfunction?", J Dent (Shiraz), 17, pp.134~141 (2016)
- Weinmann JP, "Bone and bones: fundamentals of bone biology" (1947), Mosby
- Mupparapu M, "Hard tissue structural changes in TMJ morphology prior to orthodontic therapy : a complex motion tomographic study", Quintessence Int, 42, pp.427~434 (2011)
- Al-Riyami S, "Orthognathic treatment and temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review. Part 1. A new quality-assessment technique and analysis of study characteristics and classifications", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.624.e1~15 (2009)
- Chae JM, "Evaluation of condyle-fossa relationships in adolescents with various skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography", Angle Orthod, 90, pp.224~232 (2020)
- Kim JY, "Classification of the skeletal variation in normal occlusion", Angle Orthod, 75, pp.311~319 (2005)
- Petersson A, "What you can and cannot see in TMJ imaging--an overview related to the RDC", TMD diagnostic system, 2010, pp.37, 771~778
- Nur RB, "Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 149, pp.225~237 (2016)
- Kim SJ, "Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 145, pp.317~324 (2014)
- Ji-Hwan Kim, "Comparison of cephalometric norms between Mongolian and Korean adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced profiles", 대한치과교정학회지, 41(1), pp.42~50 (2011), 대한치과교정학회
- Al-koshab M, "Assessment of condyle and glenoid fossa morphology using CBCT in South-East Asians", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0121682~ (2015)
- Hilgers ML, "Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 128, pp.803~811 (2005)
- Bjork A, "Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible : longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method", J Dent Res, 42Pt 2, pp.400~411 (1963)
- Björk A, "Prediction of mandibular growth rotation", Am J Orthod, 55, pp.585~599 (1969)
- Burke G, "Correlations between condylar characteristics and facial morphology in Class II preadolescent patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114, pp.328~336 (1998)
- Cohlmia JT, "Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion", Angle Orthod, 66, pp.27~35 (1996)
- Arnett GW, "Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, pp.290~295 (2004)