Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of various cement types on the stress distribution in monolithic zirconia crowns under maximum bite force using the finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The models of the prepared #46 crown (deep chamfer margin) were scanned and solid models composed of the monolithic zirconia crown, cement layer, and prepared tooth were produced using the computer-aided design technology and were subsequently translated into 3-dimensional finite element models. Four models were prepared according to different cement types (zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate, glass ionomer, and resin). A load of 700 N was applied vertically on the crowns (8 loading points). Maximum principal stress was determined. RESULTS. Zinc phosphate cement had a greater stress concentration in the cement layer, while polycarboxylate cement had a greater stress concentration on the distal surface of the monolithic zirconia crown and abutment tooth. Resin cement and glass ionomer cement showed similar patterns, but resin cement showed a lower stress distribution on the lingual and mesial surface of the cement layer. CONCLUSION. The test results indicate that the use of different luting agents that have various elastic moduli has an impact on the stress distribution of the monolithic zirconia crowns, cement layers, and abutment tooth. Resin cement is recommended for the luting agent of the monolithic zirconia crowns.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of various cement types on the stress distribution in monolithic zirconia crowns under maximum bite force using the finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The models of the prepared #46 crown (deep chamfer margin) were scanned and solid models composed of the monolithic zirconia crown, cement layer, and prepared tooth were produced using the computer-aided design technology and were subsequently translated into 3-dimensional finite element models. Four models were prepared according to different cement types (zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate, glass ionomer, and resin). A load of 700 N was applied vertically on the crowns (8 loading points). Maximum principal stress was determined. RESULTS. Zinc phosphate cement had a greater stress concentration in the cement layer, while polycarboxylate cement had a greater stress concentration on the distal surface of the monolithic zirconia crown and abutment tooth. Resin cement and glass ionomer cement showed similar patterns, but resin cement showed a lower stress distribution on the lingual and mesial surface of the cement layer. CONCLUSION. The test results indicate that the use of different luting agents that have various elastic moduli has an impact on the stress distribution of the monolithic zirconia crowns, cement layers, and abutment tooth. Resin cement is recommended for the luting agent of the monolithic zirconia crowns.
참고문헌 (30)
- De Jager N, "The influence of design parameters on the FEA-determined stress distribution in CADCAM produced all-ceramic dental crowns", Dent Mater, 21, pp.242~251 (2005)
- Piconi C, "Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial", Biomaterials, 20, pp.1~25 (1999)
- Shimizu K, "Time-dependent changes in the mechanical properties of zirconia ceramic", J Biomed Mater Res, 27, pp.729~734 (1993)
- Luthardt RG, "Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP-zirconia ceramics", J Dent Res, 81, pp.487~491 (2002)
- Blatz MB, "In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling", J Prosthet Dent, 91, pp.356~362 (2004)
- Guess PC, "Monolithic CAD", CAM lithium disilicate versus veneered Y-TZP crowns: comparison of failure modes and reliability after fatigue, 2010, pp.23, 434~442
- McLaren EA, "CAD", CAM systems, materials, and clinical guidelines for all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures, 2002, pp.23, 637~641
- Luthardt RG, "Accuracy of mechanical digitizing with a CAD", CAM system for fixed restorations, 2001, pp.14, 146~151
- Preis V, "In vitro failure and fracture resistance of veneered and full-contour zirconia restorations", J Dent, 40, pp.921~928 (2012)
- 하승룡, "The influence of various core designs on stress distribution in the veneered zirconia crown: a finite element analysis study", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 5(2), pp.187~197 (2013), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Xiaomei Li, "Does matching relation exist between the length and the tilting angle of terminal implants in the all-on-four protocol? stress distributions by 3D finite element analysis", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 7(3), pp.240~248 (2015), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Spazzin AO, "Influence of post and resin cement on stress distribution of maxillary central incisors restored with direct resin composite", Oper Dent, 34, pp.223~229 (2009)
- Soares CJ, "Effect of different cements on the biomechanical behavior of teeth restored with cast dowel-and-cores-in vitro and FEA analysis", J Prosthodont, 19, pp.130~137 (2010)
- Pilo R, "In vivo retrospective study of cement thickness under crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 79, pp.621~625 (1998)
- Reich S, "Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD", CAM systems, 2005, pp.113, 174~179
- Proos KA, "Influence of cement on a restored crown of a first premolar using finite element analysis", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.82~90 (2003)
- Ferrario VF, "Maximal bite forces in healthy young adults as predicted by surface electromyography", J Dent, 32, pp.451~457 (2004)
- Nishigawa K, "Quantitative study of bite force during sleep associated bruxism", J Oral Rehabil, 28, pp.485~491 (2001)
- Manso AP, "Cements and adhesives for all-ceramic restorations", Dent Clin North Am, 55, pp.311~332 (2011)
- Palacios RP, "Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement", J Prosthet Dent, 96, pp.104~114 (2006)
- Blatz MB, "Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.268~274 (2003)
- Ernst CP, "In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents", J Prosthet Dent, 93, pp.551~558 (2005)
- Pospiech P, "All-ceramic crowns: bonding or cementing?", Clin Oral Investig, 6, pp.189~197 (2002)
- Thompson JY, "Adhesion", cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now?, 2011, pp.27, 71~82
- Kamposiora P, "Finite element analysis estimates of cement microfracture under complete veneer crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 71, pp.435~441 (1994)
- Shahrbaf S, "Effect of the crown design and interface lute parameters on the stress-state of a machined crown-tooth system:a finite element analysis", Dent Mater, 29, pp.e123~e131 (2013)
- Rekow ED, "Factorial analysis of variables influencing stress in all-ceramic crowns", Dent Mater, 22, pp.125~132 (2006)
- May LG, "Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD", CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing, 2012, pp.28, e99~e109
- Ayad MF, "Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 77, pp.116~121 (1997)
- Pameijer CH, "A review of luting agents", Int J Dent, 2012, pp.752861~ (2012)