Effect of different denture cleansers on surface roughness and microhardness of artificial denture teeth
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different denture cleansers on the surface roughness and microhardness of various types of posterior denture teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 168 artificial tooth specimens were divided into the following four subgroups (n=42): SR Orthotyp PE (polymethylmethacrylate); SR Orthosit PE (Isosit); SR Postaris DCL (double cross-linked); and SR Phonares II (nanohybrid composite). The specimens were further divided according to the type of the denture cleanser (Corega Tabs (sodium perborate), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and distilled water (control) (n=14)) and immersed in the cleanser to simulate a 180-day immersion period, after which the surface roughness and microhardness were tested. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, Conover’s nonparametric multiple comparison test, and Spearman’s rank correlation analysis (P<.05). RESULTS. A comparison among the denture cleanser groups showed that NaOCl caused significantly higher roughness values on SR Orthotyp PE specimens when compared with the other artificial teeth (P<.001). Furthermore, Corega Tabs resulted in higher microhardness values in SR Orthotyp PE specimens than distilled water and NaOCl (P<.005). The microhardness values decreased significantly from distilled water, NaOCl, to Corega Tabs for SR Orthosit PE specimens (P<.001). SR Postaris DLC specimens showed increased microhardness when immersed in distilled water or NaOCl when compared with immersion in Corega Tabs (P<.003). No correlation was found between surface roughness and microhardness (r=0.104, P=.178). CONCLUSION. NaOCl and Corega Tabs affected the surface roughness and microhardness of all artificial denture teeth except for the new generation nanohybrid composite teeth.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different denture cleansers on the surface roughness and microhardness of various types of posterior denture teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 168 artificial tooth specimens were divided into the following four subgroups (n=42): SR Orthotyp PE (polymethylmethacrylate); SR Orthosit PE (Isosit); SR Postaris DCL (double cross-linked); and SR Phonares II (nanohybrid composite). The specimens were further divided according to the type of the denture cleanser (Corega Tabs (sodium perborate), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and distilled water (control) (n=14)) and immersed in the cleanser to simulate a 180-day immersion period, after which the surface roughness and microhardness were tested. The data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test, Conover’s nonparametric multiple comparison test, and Spearman’s rank correlation analysis (P<.05). RESULTS. A comparison among the denture cleanser groups showed that NaOCl caused significantly higher roughness values on SR Orthotyp PE specimens when compared with the other artificial teeth (P<.001). Furthermore, Corega Tabs resulted in higher microhardness values in SR Orthotyp PE specimens than distilled water and NaOCl (P<.005). The microhardness values decreased significantly from distilled water, NaOCl, to Corega Tabs for SR Orthosit PE specimens (P<.001). SR Postaris DLC specimens showed increased microhardness when immersed in distilled water or NaOCl when compared with immersion in Corega Tabs (P<.003). No correlation was found between surface roughness and microhardness (r=0.104, P=.178). CONCLUSION. NaOCl and Corega Tabs affected the surface roughness and microhardness of all artificial denture teeth except for the new generation nanohybrid composite teeth.
참고문헌 (24)
- Peracini A, "Effect of denture cleansers on physical properties of heat-polymerized acrylic resin", J Prosthodont Res, 54, pp.78~83 (2010)
- Jagger DC, "Denture cleansing–the best approach", Br Dent J, 178, pp.413~417 (1995)
- Razak PA, "Geriatric oral health: a review article", J Int Oral Health, 6, pp.110~116 (2014)
- Felipucci DN, "Effect of different cleansers on the surface of removable partial denture", Braz Dent J, 22, pp.392~397 (2011)
- Felton D, "Evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures: a publication of the American College of Prosthodontists", J Am Dent Assoc, 142, pp.1S~20S (2011)
- Suwannaroop P, "In vitro wear resistance, hardness and elastic modulus of artificial denture teeth", Dent Mater J, 30, pp.461~468 (2011)
- Phunthikaphadr T, "Pressure transmission and distribution under impact load using artificial denture teeth made of different materials", J Prosthet Dent, 102, pp.319~327 (2009)
- Kawano F, "Shock absorbability and hardness of commercially available denture teeth", Int J Prosthodont, 15, pp.243~247 (2002)
- Suzuki S, "In vitro wear of nano-composite denture teeth", J Prosthodont, 13, pp.238~243 (2004)
- "Research and Development Scientific Service"[URL]
- Neppelenbroek KH, "Hardness and surface roughness of enamel and base layers of resin denture teeth after long-term repeated chemical disinfection", J Contemp Dent Pract, 16, pp.54~60 (2015)
- Powers JM, "Craig’s restorative dental materials", pp.19~ (2012), Elsevier
- Bollen CM, "Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature", Dent Mater, 13, pp.258~269 (1997)
- Teughels W, "Effect of material characteristics and", or surface topography on biofilm development, 2006, pp.17, 68~81
- Berger JC, "Surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins after processing and after polishing", J Prosthodont, 15, pp.180~186 (2006)
- Pisani MX, "Effect of experimental Ricinus communis solution for denture cleaning on the properties of acrylic resin teeth", Braz Dent J, 23, pp.15~21 (2012)
- Vasconcelos LR, "Effect of chemical and microwave disinfection on the surface microhardness of acrylic resin denture teeth", J Prosthodont, 22, pp.298~303 (2013)
- Ayaz EA, "Effects of cigarette smoke and denture cleaners on the surface roughness and color stability of different denture teeth", J Prosthet Dent, 112, pp.241~248 (2014)
- Campanha NH, "The effect of long-term disinfection procedures on hardness property of resin denture teeth", Gerodontology, 29, pp.e571~e576 (2012)
- Pavarina AC, "The effect of disinfectant solutions on the hardness of acrylic resin denture teeth", J Oral Rehabil, 30, pp.749~752 (2003)
- Carolina Pero A, "Effect of immersion cleansers on the bond strength between a denture base resin and acrylic resin teeth", Int J Adhes Adhes, 44, pp.180~183 (2013)
- Harrison Z, "An in vitro study into the effect of a limited range of denture cleaners on surface roughness and removal of Candida albicans from conventional heat-cured acrylic resin denture base material", J Oral Rehabil, 31, pp.460~467 (2004)
- Low IM, "Effects of load and time on the hardness of a viscoelastic polymer", Mater Res Bull, 33, pp.1753~1758 (1998)
- Braun KO, "Surface texture and some properties of acrylic resins submitted to chemical polishing", J Oral Rehabil, 30, pp.91~98 (2003)