Detection of proximal caries using quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital and laser fluorescence: a comparative study
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro validity of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D) and laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent) for assessing proximal caries in extracted premolars, using digital radiography as reference method. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 102 extracted premolars with similar lengths and shapes were used. A single operator conducted all the examinations using three different detection methods (bitewing radiography, QLF-D, and DIAGNOdent). The bitewing x-ray scale, QLF-D fluorescence loss (ΔF), and DIAGNOdent peak readings were compared and statistically analyzed. RESULTS. Each method showed an excellent reliability. The correlation coefficient between bitewing radiography and QLF-D, DIAGNOdent were -0.644 and 0.448, respectively, while the value between QLF-D and DIAGNOdent was -0.382. The kappa statistics for bitewing radiography and QLF-D had a higher diagnosis consensus than those for bitewing radiography and DIAGNOdent. The QLF-D was moderately to highly accurate (AUC = 0.753 - 0.908), while DIAGNOdent was moderately to less accurate (AUC = 0.622 - 0.784). All detection methods showed statistically significant correlation and high correlation between the bitewing radiography and QLF-D. CONCLUSION. QLF-D was found to be a valid and reliable alternative diagnostic method to digital bitewing radiography for in vitro detection of proximal caries.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro validity of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D) and laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent) for assessing proximal caries in extracted premolars, using digital radiography as reference method. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 102 extracted premolars with similar lengths and shapes were used. A single operator conducted all the examinations using three different detection methods (bitewing radiography, QLF-D, and DIAGNOdent). The bitewing x-ray scale, QLF-D fluorescence loss (ΔF), and DIAGNOdent peak readings were compared and statistically analyzed. RESULTS. Each method showed an excellent reliability. The correlation coefficient between bitewing radiography and QLF-D, DIAGNOdent were -0.644 and 0.448, respectively, while the value between QLF-D and DIAGNOdent was -0.382. The kappa statistics for bitewing radiography and QLF-D had a higher diagnosis consensus than those for bitewing radiography and DIAGNOdent. The QLF-D was moderately to highly accurate (AUC = 0.753 - 0.908), while DIAGNOdent was moderately to less accurate (AUC = 0.622 - 0.784). All detection methods showed statistically significant correlation and high correlation between the bitewing radiography and QLF-D. CONCLUSION. QLF-D was found to be a valid and reliable alternative diagnostic method to digital bitewing radiography for in vitro detection of proximal caries.
참고문헌 (28)
- Matalon S, "Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 95, pp.626~631 (2003)
- Murray JJ, "The prevalence and progression of approximal caries in the deciduous dentition in British children", Br Dent J, 145, pp.161~164 (1978)
- Arnold WH, "Three-dimensional reconstruction of approximal subsurface caries lesions in deciduous molars", Clin Oral Investig, 2, pp.174~179 (1998)
- Rayner JA, "Pulp changes in deciduous teeth associated with deep carious dentine", J Dent, 7, pp.39~42 (1979)
- Choi SC, "About the effect of Bite-wing radiograph’s diagnosis", J Korean Dent Assoc, 27, pp.688~695 (1989)
- White SC, "Oral radiology: principles and interpretation", pp.272~279 (2000), Mosby
- 김백일, "QLF의 원리와 임상적 활용", 대한치과의사협회지, 49(8), pp.443~450 (2011), 대한치과의사협회
- 강시묵, "QLF-D, ICDAS, DIAGNOdent를 이용한 발거된 치아의 교합면 우식증의 정량화 비교", 대한구강보건학회지, 38(2), pp.105~110 (2014), 대한예방치과·구강보건학회
- Pretty IA, "Caries detection and diagnosis: novel technologies", J Dent, 34, pp.727~739 (2006)
- Hibst R, "Caries detection by red excited fluorescence:investigations on fluorophores", Caries Res, 33, pp.295~ (1999)
- Yang J, "Utility of radiology, laser fluorescence, and transillumination", Dent Clin North Am, 49, pp.739~752 (2005)
- Chong MJ, "Visualtactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars", Pediatr Dent, 25, pp.341~349 (2003)
- Mepparambath RS, "Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography:An in vivo study", Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 7, pp.163~167 (2014)
- Virajsilp V, "Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography", Pediatr Dent, 27, pp.493~499 (2005)
- Shi XQ, "Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface caries", Caries Res, 35, pp.21~26 (2001)
- Farah RA, "elationship between laser fluorescence and enamel hypomineralisation", J Dent, 36, pp.915~921 (2008)
- Kim SH, "Caries diagnosis by diagnodent›s laser fluorescence detection in vitro", J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 27, pp.24~31 (2000)
- Ko HY, "Validation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D)for the detection of approximal caries in vitro", J Dent, 43, pp.568~575 (2015)
- Lussi A, "Detection of approximal caries with a new laser fluorescence device", Caries Res, 40, pp.97~103 (2006)
- Bussaneli DG, "Proximal caries lesion detection in primary teeth: does this justify the association of diagnostic methods?", Lasers Med Sci, 30, pp.2239~2244 (2015)
- Allen MJ, "Introduction to measurement theory", pp.76~77 (1979), Wadsworth
- Pitts NB, "Systems for grading approximal carious lesions and overlaps diagnosed from bitewing radiographs. Proposals for future standardization", Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 12, pp.114~122 (1984)
- Mejàre I, "Accuracy at radiography and probing for the diagnosis of proximal caries", Scand J Dent Res, 93, pp.178~184 (1985)
- Eli I, "Interpretation of bitewing radiographs. Part 1. Evaluation of the presence of approximal lesions", J Dent, 24, pp.379~383 (1996)
- van der Veen MH, "Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence for assessing early caries lesions", Monogr Oral Sci, 17, pp.144~162 (2000)
- Buchalla W, "Optimal camera and illumination angulations for detection of interproximal caries using quantitative light-induced fluorescence", Caries Res, 36, pp.320~326 (2002)
- Alwas-Danowska HM, "Reliability and validity issues of laser fluorescence measurements in occlusal caries diagnosis", J Dent, 30, pp.129~134 (2002)
- Anttonen V, "A follow-up study of the use of DIAGNOdent for monitoring fissure caries in children", Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 32, pp.312~318 (2004)