세대별 QLF 기기의 평활면 비와동형 법랑질 우식 병소 탐지에 관한 진단정확도 비교
Comparison of fluorescence loss measurements among various generations of QLF devices
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
surface by using four kinds of the QLF devices. Materials and Methods: A total of 52 human permanent premolars and molars were used. Fluorescence images were captured by the QLF devices (Inspektor Pro, QLF-D, Qraycam, and Qraypen). Fluorescence loss of the QLF was calculated. The severity of lesions was categorized into the following 3 scores using polarized light microscopy: normal (S), enamel demineralization to outer half of enamel (D1), and inner half of the enamel up to the dentin-enamel junction (D2). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the fluorescence loss among the QLF devices. Spearman rank correlation coefficient between histological scores and fluorescence loss of the devices was calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) were calculated to compare their diagnostic accuracies. Results: The correlation coefficients between histological scores and the fluorescence loss of the devices showed 0.77 to 0.81 (P < 0.001). All histological scores, the fluorescence loss among the devices showed no statistical difference. Among the devices, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of the fluorescence loss showed 0.84 to 0.94, 0.76 to 0.90, and 0.90 to 0.92, respectively. Conclusions: All QLF devices had no difference with excellent diagnostic accuracies to detect non-cavitated enamel caries on smooth surface.
Abstract
surface by using four kinds of the QLF devices. Materials and Methods: A total of 52 human permanent premolars and molars were used. Fluorescence images were captured by the QLF devices (Inspektor Pro, QLF-D, Qraycam, and Qraypen). Fluorescence loss of the QLF was calculated. The severity of lesions was categorized into the following 3 scores using polarized light microscopy: normal (S), enamel demineralization to outer half of enamel (D1), and inner half of the enamel up to the dentin-enamel junction (D2). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the fluorescence loss among the QLF devices. Spearman rank correlation coefficient between histological scores and fluorescence loss of the devices was calculated. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) were calculated to compare their diagnostic accuracies. Results: The correlation coefficients between histological scores and the fluorescence loss of the devices showed 0.77 to 0.81 (P < 0.001). All histological scores, the fluorescence loss among the devices showed no statistical difference. Among the devices, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of the fluorescence loss showed 0.84 to 0.94, 0.76 to 0.90, and 0.90 to 0.92, respectively. Conclusions: All QLF devices had no difference with excellent diagnostic accuracies to detect non-cavitated enamel caries on smooth surface.
참고문헌 (26)
- Clara J, "DMF from WHO basic methods to ICDAS II advanced methods : a systematic review of literature", Odontostomatol Trop, 35(139), pp.5~11 (2012)
- Pitts NB, "Are we ready to move from operative to non-operative", preventive treatment of dental caries in clinical practice?, 2004, pp.38(3), 294~304
- Gomez J, "Non-cavitated carious lesions detection methods: a systematic review", Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 41(1), pp.54~66 (2013)
- Konig K, "Laser-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy of dental caries", Cell Mol Biol, 44(8), pp.1293~1300 (1998)
- Braga MM, "Detection activity assessment and diagnosis of dental caries lesions", Dent Clin North Am, 54(3), pp.479~493 (2010)
- Ko HY, "Validation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLFD)for the detection of approximal caries in vitro", J Dent, 43(5), pp.568~575 (2015)
- Aljehani A, "In vitro quantification of smooth surface caries with DIAGNOdent and the DIAGNOdent pen", Acta Odontol Scand, 65(1), pp.60~63 (2007)
- Pretty IA, "Caries detection and diagnosis : novel technologies", J Dent, 34(10), pp.727~739 (2006)
- van der Veen MH, "Detecting short-term changes in the activity of caries lesions with the aid of new technologies", Curr Oral Health Rep, 2(2), pp.102~109 (2015)
- Angmar-Mansson B, "Quantitative light-induced fluorescence(QLF) : a method for assessment of incipient caries lesions", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 30(6), pp.298~307 (2001)
- Bjelkhagen H, "Early detection of enamel caries by the luminescence excited by visible laser light", Swed Dent J, 6(1), pp.1~7 (1982)
- van der Veen MH, "Application of quantitative light-induced fluorescence for assessing early caries lesions", Monogr Oral Sci, 17, pp.144~162 (2000)
- Stookey GK, "Quantitative light fluorescence: a technology for early monitoring of the caries process", Dent Clin North Am, 49(4), pp.753~770 (2005)
- Al-Khateeb S, "Quantification of formation and remineralization of artificial enamel lesions with a new portable fluorescence device", Adv Dent Res, 11(4), pp.502~506 (1997)
- Tranæus S, "Potential applications and limitations of quantitative light-induced fluorescence in dentistry", Med Laser Appl, 16(3), pp.195~204 (2001)
- Shi XQ, "Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface caries", Caries Res, 35(1), pp.21~26 (2001)
- Kim HE, "Analysis of orange", red Fluorescence for bacterial activity in initial carious lesions may provide accurate lesion activity assessment for caries progression, 2017, pp.17(2), 125~128
- de Josselin de Jong E, "Quantified light-induced fluorescence, review of a diagnostic tool in prevention of oral disease", J Appl Phys, 105(10), pp.102031~ (2009)
- Jallad M, "In vitro detection of occlusal caries on permanent teeth by a visual, light-Induced fluorescence and photothermal radiometry and modulated luminescence methods", Caries Res, 49(5), pp.523~530 (2015)
- Tagtekin DA, "Caries detection with DIAGNOdent and ultrasound", Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 106(5), pp.729~735 (2008)
- Hibst R, "Detection of occlusal caries by laser fluorescence : basic and clinical investigations", Med Laser Appl, 16(3), pp.205~213 (2001)
- Kim HE, "Recovery percentage of remineralization according to severity of early caries", Am J Dent, 26(3), pp.132~136 (2013)
- Jun MK, "Detection and analysis of enamel cracks by quantitative lightinduced fluorescence technology", J Endod, 42(3), pp.500~504 (2016)
- Kim YS, "Monitoring the maturation process of a dental microcosm biofilm using the Quantitative light-induced fluorescencedigital (QLF-D)", J Dent, 42(6), pp.691~696 (2014)
- Lee ES, "Association between the cariogenicity of a dental microcosm biofilm and its red fluorescence detected by Quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLFD).", J Dent, 41(12), pp.1264~1270 (2013)
- Gomez GF, "Orange", red fluorescence of active caries by retrospective Quantitative light-induced fluorescence image analysis, 2016, pp.50(3), 295~302