Comparison of different digital shade selection methodologies in terms of accuracy
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose. The aim of this stuldy was to compare the clinical marginal fit of CAD-CAM inlays obtained from intraoral digital impression or addition silicone impression techniques. Materials and Methods. The study included 31 inlays for prosthodontics purposes of 31 patients: 15 based on intraoral digital impressions (DI group); and 16 based on a conventional impression technique (CI group). Inlays included occlusal and a non-occlusal surface. Inlays were milled in ceramic. The inlay-teeth interface was replicated by placing each inlay in its corresponding uncemented clinical preparation and taking interface impressions with silicone material from occlusal and free surfaces. Interface analysis was made using white light confocal microscopy (WLCM) (scanning area: 694 × 510 μm2) from the impression samples. The gap size and the inlay overextension were measured from the microscopy topographies. For analytical purposes (i.e., 95-%-confidence intervals calculations and P-value calculations), the procedure REGRESS in SUDAAN was used to account for clustering (i.e., multiple measurements). For p-value calculation, the log transformation of the dependent variables was used to normalize the distributions. Results. Marginal fit values for occlusal and free surfaces were affected by the type of impression. There were no differences between surfaces (occlusal vs. free). Gap obtained for DI group was 164 ± 84 μm and that for CI group was 209 ± 104 μm, and there were statistical differences between them (p = .041). Mean overextension values were 60 ± 59 μm for DI group and 67 ± 73 μm for CI group, and there were no differences between then (p = .553). Conclusion. Digital impression achieved inlays with higher clinical marginal fit and performed better than the conventional silicone materials.
Abstract
Purpose. The aim of this stuldy was to compare the clinical marginal fit of CAD-CAM inlays obtained from intraoral digital impression or addition silicone impression techniques. Materials and Methods. The study included 31 inlays for prosthodontics purposes of 31 patients: 15 based on intraoral digital impressions (DI group); and 16 based on a conventional impression technique (CI group). Inlays included occlusal and a non-occlusal surface. Inlays were milled in ceramic. The inlay-teeth interface was replicated by placing each inlay in its corresponding uncemented clinical preparation and taking interface impressions with silicone material from occlusal and free surfaces. Interface analysis was made using white light confocal microscopy (WLCM) (scanning area: 694 × 510 μm2) from the impression samples. The gap size and the inlay overextension were measured from the microscopy topographies. For analytical purposes (i.e., 95-%-confidence intervals calculations and P-value calculations), the procedure REGRESS in SUDAAN was used to account for clustering (i.e., multiple measurements). For p-value calculation, the log transformation of the dependent variables was used to normalize the distributions. Results. Marginal fit values for occlusal and free surfaces were affected by the type of impression. There were no differences between surfaces (occlusal vs. free). Gap obtained for DI group was 164 ± 84 μm and that for CI group was 209 ± 104 μm, and there were statistical differences between them (p = .041). Mean overextension values were 60 ± 59 μm for DI group and 67 ± 73 μm for CI group, and there were no differences between then (p = .553). Conclusion. Digital impression achieved inlays with higher clinical marginal fit and performed better than the conventional silicone materials.
참고문헌 (53)
- Kahramanoğlu E, "Esthetic and color in dentistry", Cumhuriyet Dent J, 16, pp.339~347 (2013)
- Yilmaz B, "Factors affecting the visual tooth shade selection : a review", Dent Med J-R, 2, pp.76~83 (2020)
- Basavanna RS, "Shade selection", Int J Oral Health Sci, 3, pp.26~31 (2013)
- Joiner A, "Tooth colour and whiteness : A review", J Dent, 67S, pp.S3~S10 (2017)
- Tabatabaian F, "Accuracy and precision of intraoral scanners for shade matching : A systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, pp.S0022-3913(22)00565-0~ (2022)
- Jorquera GJ, "A comparison of ceramic crown color difference between different shade selection methods : Visual, digital camera, and smartphone", J Prosthet Dent, 128, pp.784~792 (2022)
- Kröger E, "In vitro comparison of instrumental and visual tooth shade determination under different illuminants", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.848~855 (2015)
- Igiel C, "Dental color matching : A comparison between visual and instrumental methods", Dent Mater J, 35, pp.63~69 (2016)
- Ristic I, "Influence of color education and training on shade matching skills", J Esthet Restor Dent, 28, pp.287~294 (2016)
- Nakhaei M, "Shade matching performance of dental students with three various lighting conditions", J Contemp Dent Pract, 14, pp.100~103 (2013)
- Turgut S, "Color in dentistry and color measuring methods", J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni, 5, pp.65~75 (2012)
- Cone MR, "Optimized digital shade calibration technology for the restoration of a single central incisor", J Prosthet Dent, 128, pp.1~3 (2022)
- Alsaleh S, "Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means", J Dent, 40(Suppl 1), pp.e82~e87 (2012)
- Mahn E, "Comparison of visual analog shade matching, a digital visual method with a cross-polarized light filter, and a spectrophotometer for dental color matching", J Prosthet Dent, 125, pp.511~516 (2021)
- Parameswaran V, "Comparison of accuracies of an intraoral spectrophotometer and conventional visual method for shade matching using two shade guide systems", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 16, pp.352~358 (2016)
- Liberato WF, "A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching : A clinical study", J Prosthet Dent, 121, pp.271~275 (2019)
- Hampé-Kautz V, "A comparative in vivo study of new shade matching procedures", Int J Comput Dent, 23, pp.317~323 (2020)
- Yoon HI, "A study on possibility of clinical application for color measurements of shade guides using an intraoral digital scanner", J Prosthodont, 27, pp.670~675 (2018)
- Dozić A, "Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices", J Prosthodont, 16, pp.93~100 (2007)
- Tsiliagkou A, "Evaluation of reliability and validity of three dental color-matching devices", Int J Esthet Dent, 11, pp.110~124 (2016)
- Öroğlu A, "A review of color matching in dentistry", Med Records, 3, pp.44~49 (2021)
- Miyajiwala JS, "Comparison of photographic and conventional methods for tooth shade selection : A clinical evaluation", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 17, pp.273~281 (2017)
- Alshiddi IF, "A comparison of conventional visual and spectrophotometric shade taking by trained and untrained dental students", Aust Dent J, 60, pp.176~181 (2015)
- Paul S, "Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth", J Dent Res, 81, pp.578~582 (2002)
- Recen D, "The effect of experience on composite resin shade selection in comparison to a spectrophotometer", Acta Odontol Tuc, 33, pp.12~17 (2016)
- Dudea D, "Influence of background", surrounding area on accuracy of visual color matching, 2016, pp.20, 1167~1173
- Dagg H, "The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection", J Oral Rehabil, 31, pp.900~904 (2004)
- Reyes J, "Repeatability of the human eye compared to an intraoral scanner in dental shade matching", Heliyon, 5, pp.e02100~ (2019)
- Bahannan SA, "Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods", J Dent, 42, pp.48~52 (2014)
- Pohlen B, "Tooth shade-matching ability between groups of students with different color knowledge", Int J Prosthodont, 29, pp.487~492 (2016)
- Mehl A, "In vivo tooth-color measurement with a new 3D intraoral scanning system in comparison to conventional digital and visual color determination methods", Int J Comput Dent, 20, pp.343~361 (2017)
- Da Silva JD, "Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction", J Prosthet Dent, 99, pp.361~368 (2008)
- Jorquera GJ, "A comparison of ceramic crown color difference between different shade selection methods : Visual, digital camera, and smartphone", J Prosthet Dent, 128, pp.784~792 (2022)
- Tung FF, "The repeatability of an intraoral dental colorimeter", J Prosthet Dent, 88, pp.585~590 (2002)
- Ebeid K, "Accuracy and repeatability of different intraoral scanners on shade determination", J Esthet Restor Dent, 33, pp.844~848 (2021)
- Lazar R, "The accuracy of dental shade matching using cross-polarization photography", Int J Comput Dent, 22, pp.343~351 (2019)
- Lazar R, "Assessment of a new photographic system used in dentistry", Optoelectronics Adv Mater, 10, pp.426~432 (2016)
- Khurana R, "A clinical evaluation of the individual repeatability of three commercially available colour measuring devices", Br Dent J, 203, pp.675~680 (2007)
- Igiel C, "Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching", J Esthet Restor Dent, 29, pp.303~308 (2017)
- Gómez-Polo C, "Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.65~70 (2016)
- Pérez MM, "Does background color influence visual thresholds?", J Dent, 102, pp.103475~ (2020)
- Ghinea R, "Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics", J Dent, 38(Suppl 2), pp.e57~e64 (2010)
- Mahn E, "Comparison of visual analog shade matching, a digital visual method with a cross-polarized light filter, and a spectrophotometer for dental color matching", J Prosthet Dent, 125, pp.511~516 (2021)
- Borse S, "Tooth shade analysis and selection in prosthodontics : A systematic review and meta-analysis", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 20, pp.131~140 (2020)
- Paravina RD, "Accelerated aging effects on color and translucency of bleaching-shade composites", J Esthet Restor Dent, 16, pp.117~127 (2004)
- Brandt J, "In vivo study for tooth colour determination-visual versus digital", Clin Oral Investig, 21, pp.2863~2871 (2017)
- Browning WD, "A comparison of human raters and an intra-oral spectrophotometer", Oper Dent, 34, pp.337~343 (2009)
- Wee AG, "Use of a porcelain color discrimination test to evaluate color difference formulas", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.101~109 (2007)
- Ahmadzadeh A, "Spectrophotometric comparison of two porcelain systems, VMK master and VM13 with the VITA 3D-master shade guide(An in vitro study)", Dent Res J, 19, pp.35~ (2022)
- Kielbassa AM, "In vitro comparison of visual and computer-aided pre-and post-tooth shade determination using various home bleaching procedures", J Prosthet Dent, 101, pp.92~100 (2009)
- Yuan JC, "Defining a natural tooth color space based on a 3-dimensional shade system", J Prosthet Dent, 98, pp.110~119 (2007)
- Huang M, "The accuracies of three intraoral scanners with regard to shade determination : An in vitro study", J Prosthodont, 32, pp.111~117 (2023)
- "ISO", TR 28642. Dentistry - Guidance on colour measurement, 2016