A retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes of implant restorations for posterior edentulous area: 3-unit bridge supported by 2 implants vs 3 splinted implant-supported crowns
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. To compare the clinical outcomes of two types of implant restoration for posterior edentulous area, 3-unit bridge supported by 2 implants and 3 implant-supported splinted crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The data included 127 implant-supported fixed restorations in 85 patients: 37 restorations of 3-unit bridge supported by 2 implants (2-IB), 37 restorations of 3 implantsupported splinted crowns (3-IC), and 53 single restorations (S) as controls. Peri-implantitis and mechanical complications that occurred for 14 years were analyzed by multivariable Cox regression model. Kaplan-Meier curves and the multivariable Cox regression model were used to analyze the success and survival of implants. RESULTS. Peri-implantitis occurred in 28.4% of 2-IB group, 37.8% of 3-IC group, and 28.3% of S control group with no significant difference. According to the implant position, middle implants (P2) of the 3-IC group had the highest risk of peri-implantitis. The 3-IC group showed a lower mechanical complication rate (7.2%) than the 2-IB (16.2%) and S control group (20.8%). The cumulative success rate was 52.8% in S (control) group, 62.2% in 2-IB group, and 60.4% in 3-IC group. The cumulative survival rate was 98.1% in S (control) group, 98.6% in 2-IB group, and 95.5% in 3-IC group. There was no significant difference in the success and survival rate according to the restoration type. CONCLUSION. The restoration type was not associated with the success and survival of implants. The risk of mechanical complications was reduced in 3 implant-supported splinted crowns. However, the middle implants of the 3 implant-supported splinted crowns had a higher risk of peri-implantitis.
Abstract
PURPOSE. To compare the clinical outcomes of two types of implant restoration for posterior edentulous area, 3-unit bridge supported by 2 implants and 3 implant-supported splinted crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The data included 127 implant-supported fixed restorations in 85 patients: 37 restorations of 3-unit bridge supported by 2 implants (2-IB), 37 restorations of 3 implantsupported splinted crowns (3-IC), and 53 single restorations (S) as controls. Peri-implantitis and mechanical complications that occurred for 14 years were analyzed by multivariable Cox regression model. Kaplan-Meier curves and the multivariable Cox regression model were used to analyze the success and survival of implants. RESULTS. Peri-implantitis occurred in 28.4% of 2-IB group, 37.8% of 3-IC group, and 28.3% of S control group with no significant difference. According to the implant position, middle implants (P2) of the 3-IC group had the highest risk of peri-implantitis. The 3-IC group showed a lower mechanical complication rate (7.2%) than the 2-IB (16.2%) and S control group (20.8%). The cumulative success rate was 52.8% in S (control) group, 62.2% in 2-IB group, and 60.4% in 3-IC group. The cumulative survival rate was 98.1% in S (control) group, 98.6% in 2-IB group, and 95.5% in 3-IC group. There was no significant difference in the success and survival rate according to the restoration type. CONCLUSION. The restoration type was not associated with the success and survival of implants. The risk of mechanical complications was reduced in 3 implant-supported splinted crowns. However, the middle implants of the 3 implant-supported splinted crowns had a higher risk of peri-implantitis.
참고문헌 (23)
- Jemt T, "Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws : a 5-year follow-up report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.635~640 (1993)
- Attard N, "Implant prosthodontic management of posterior partial edentulism : long-term follow-up of a prospective study", J Can Dent Assoc, 68, pp.118~124 (2002)
- Zarb GA, "The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in posterior partially edentulous patients", Int J Prosthodont, 6, pp.189~196 (1993)
- Wyatt CC, "Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.204~211 (1998)
- Rangert B, "Forces and moments on Brånemark implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 4, pp.241~247 (1989)
- Gunne J, "Implant treatment in partially edentulous patients : a report on prostheses after 3 years", Int J Prosthodont, 7, pp.143~148 (1994)
- Lekholm U, "Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws : a prospective 5-year multicenter study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.627~635 (1994)
- Eliasson A, "Fixed partial prostheses supported by 2 or 3 implants : a retrospective study up to 18 years", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.567~574 (2006)
- Ravidà A, "Comparison of three different types of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses : A long-term retrospective study of clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness", Clin Oral Implants Res, 30, pp.295~305 (2019)
- Yi Y, "Association of prosthetic features and peri-implantitis : A cross-sectional study", J Clin Periodontol, 47, pp.392~403 (2020)
- Yi YJ, "Comparative clinical study of three-unit fixed partial prostheses supported by two or three implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 28, pp.1110~1115 (2013)
- Yi Y, "Mechanical complications of implant-supported restorations with internal conical connection implants : A 14-year retrospective study", J Prosthet Dent (2021)
- "ImageJ"[URL]
- Berglundh T, "Peri-implant diseases and conditions : Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions", J Clin Periodontol, 45, pp.S286~S291 (2018)
- Souza AB, "Histological and micro-CT analysis of peri-implant soft and hard tissue healing on implants with different healing abutments configurations", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.1007~1015 (2018)
- Karlsson K, "Technical complications following implant-supported restorative therapy performed in Sweden", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.603~611 (2018)
- Shi JY, "Longterm outcomes of narrow diameter implants in posterior jaws : A retrospective study with at least 8-year follow-up", Clin Oral Implants Res, 29, pp.76~81 (2018)
- Clelland NL, "Comparison of strains for splinted and nonsplinted implant prostheses using three-dimensional image correlation", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.953~959 (2010)
- Guichet DL, "Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 87, pp.528~535 (2002)
- Alhammadi SH, "Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns versus 3-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in Dubai Health Authority : a retrospective study", BMC Oral Health, 21, pp.171~ (2021)
- 이유승, "Comparison of implant component fractures in external and internal type: A 12-year retrospective study", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 10(2), pp.155~162 (2018), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Adler L, "Survival and complications : A 9-to 15-year retrospective follow-up of dental implant therapy", J Oral Rehabil, 47, pp.67~77 (2020)
- Ioannidis A, "Prospective randomized controlled clinical study comparing two types of two-piece dental implants supporting fixed reconstructions-Results at 5 years of loading", Clin Oral Implants Res, 30, pp.1126~1133 (2019)