A retrospective clinical study of single short implants (less than 8 mm) in posterior edentulous areas
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of single short implants, less than 8 mm in length, placed in the posterior area. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 128 patients (75 male and 53 female, mean age: 52.6±11.2 years) with 154 implants participated. Implant marginal bone loss, and survival and success rates were measured. RESULTS. The mean follow-up period was 51.35±24.97 months. A total of 128 implants, 8 mm in length, were placed in patients who had mean marginal bone loss of 0.75 mm. These implants had a survival rate of 95.3%. Twenty-six implants, 7 mm in length, were placed in areas with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.78 mm and had a survival rate of 96.2%. Both marginal bone loss and survival rate were not statistically different among the groups. In the maxilla, 34 implants showed a mean marginal bone loss of 0.77 mm and a survival rate of 97.1%. In the mandible, 120 implants showed a mean marginal bone loss of 0.75 mm and a survival rate of 95.0%. The average marginal bone loss around all implants was 0.76±0.27 mm at the last follow-up review after functional loading. The survival rate was 95.6% and success rate was 93.5%. CONCLUSION. In our study, single short implants less than 8 mm in length in the posterior areas had favorable clinical outcomes.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of single short implants, less than 8 mm in length, placed in the posterior area. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 128 patients (75 male and 53 female, mean age: 52.6±11.2 years) with 154 implants participated. Implant marginal bone loss, and survival and success rates were measured. RESULTS. The mean follow-up period was 51.35±24.97 months. A total of 128 implants, 8 mm in length, were placed in patients who had mean marginal bone loss of 0.75 mm. These implants had a survival rate of 95.3%. Twenty-six implants, 7 mm in length, were placed in areas with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.78 mm and had a survival rate of 96.2%. Both marginal bone loss and survival rate were not statistically different among the groups. In the maxilla, 34 implants showed a mean marginal bone loss of 0.77 mm and a survival rate of 97.1%. In the mandible, 120 implants showed a mean marginal bone loss of 0.75 mm and a survival rate of 95.0%. The average marginal bone loss around all implants was 0.76±0.27 mm at the last follow-up review after functional loading. The survival rate was 95.6% and success rate was 93.5%. CONCLUSION. In our study, single short implants less than 8 mm in length in the posterior areas had favorable clinical outcomes.
참고문헌 (25)
- Misch CE, "A positive correlation between occlusal trauma and peri-implant bone loss: literature support", Implant Dent, 14, pp.108~116 (2005)[DOI]
- Rocci A, "Immediate loading of Branemark System TiUnite and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible: a randomized open-ended clinical trial", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 5, pp.57~63 (2003)
- Glauser R, "Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark TiUnite implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 1-year results of a prospective clinical study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 5, pp.47~56 (2003)
- Sun HL, "Failure rates of short (<TEX>${\leq}$<", TEX> 10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a systematic review, 2011, pp.26, 816~825
- Gentile MA, "Survival estimates and risk factors for failure with 6 <TEX>$\times$<", TEX> 5.7-mm implants, 2005, pp.20, 930~937
- Chan MF, "Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.7~15 (1998)
- Misch CE, "Short dental implants: a literature review and rationale for use", Dent Today, 24, pp.64~66 (2005)
- Balshi TJ, "A retrospective analysis of 800 Branemark System implants following the <TEX>$All-on-Four^{TM}$<", TEX> protocol, 2014, pp.23, 83~88
- Annibali S, "Short dental implants: a systematic review", J Dent Res, 91, pp.25~32 (2012)[DOI]
- Mendonca JA, "A retrospective evaluation of the survival rates of splinted and non-splinted short dental implants in posterior partially edentulous jaws", J Periodontol, 85, pp.787~794 (2014)[DOI]
- Antoun H, "Consecutive Case Series of Healed Single-Molar Sites Immediately Restored with Wide- Diameter Implants: A 1-Year Evaluation", Int J Dent, 2016, pp.5645892~ (2016)
- Calandriello R, "Immediate occlusal loading of single lower molars using Branemark <TEX>$System^{(R)}$<", TEX> Wide Platform <TEX>$TiUnite^{TM}$<, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, pp.2011, 13[DOI]
- Fugazzotto PA, "ITI implant use in private practice: Clinical results with 5,526 implants followed up to 72+ months in function", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.408~412 (2004)
- Malmstrom H, "Success rate of short dental implants supporting single crowns and fixed bridges", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27, pp.1093~1098 (2016)[DOI]
- Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Zarb GA, "Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants", J Prosthet Dent, 80, pp.641~ (1998)[DOI]
- Herrmann I, "Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.220~230 (2005)
- Weng D, "A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 18, pp.417~423 (2003)
- Telleman G, "A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient", J Clin Periodontol, 38, pp.667~76 (2011)[DOI]
- Romeo E, "Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3- to 14-year longitudinal study", Int J Prosthodont, 19, pp.586~592 (2006)
- Malo P, "Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 9, pp.15~21 (2007)[DOI]
- Kim YK, "Prognosis of single molar implants: a retrospective study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 30, pp.401~407 (2010)
- Kim YK, "A retrospective study on the prognosis of single implant placed at the sinus bone graft site", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 118, pp.181~186 (2014)[DOI]
- Isidor F, "Clinical probing and radiographic assessment in relation to the histologic bone level at oral implants in monkeys", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8, pp.255~264 (1997)[DOI]
- Yilmaz B, "Comparison of strains for splinted and nonsplinted screw-retained prostheses on short implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.1176~1182 (2011)