Predictive Value of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring during Resection of Intraparenchymal and Intraventricular Tumors Using an Endoscopic Port
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Background and Purpose Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) using upper and lower somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) is an established technique used to predict and prevent neurologic injury during intracranial tumor resections. Endoscopic port surgery (EPS) is a minimally-invasive approach to deep intraparenchymal and intraventricular brain tumors. The authors intended to evaluate the predictive value of SSEP monitoring during resection of intracranial brain tumors using a parallel endoscopic technique. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of patients operated on from 2007-2010 utilizing IONM in whom endoscopic ports were used to remove either intraparenchymal or intraventricular tumors. Cases were eligible for review if an endoscopic port was used to resect an intracranial tumor and the electronic chart included all intraoperative monitoring data as well as pre- and post-operative neurologic exams. Results 139 EPS cases met criteria for inclusion. Eighty five patients (61%) had intraparenchymal and fifty four (39%) had intraventricular tumors or colloid cysts. SSEP changes were seen in eleven cases (7.9%), being irreversible in three (2.2%) and reversible in eight cases (5.8%). Seven patients (5.0%) with intraparenchymal tumors had SSEP changes which met our criterea for significant changes while there were four (2.9%) with intraventricular (p-value=0.25). Five patients suffered post operative deficits, two reversible and two irreversible SSEP changes. Only one case exhibited post operative hemiparesis with no SSEP changes. The positive predictive value of SSEP was 45.4% and the negative predictive value was 99.2%. Conclusions Based on the high negative and low positive predictive values, the utility of SSEP monitoring for cylindrical port resections may be limited. However, the use of SSEP monitoring can be helpful in reducing the impact of endoscopic port manipulation when the tumor is closer to the somatosensory pathway.
Abstract
Background and Purpose Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) using upper and lower somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) is an established technique used to predict and prevent neurologic injury during intracranial tumor resections. Endoscopic port surgery (EPS) is a minimally-invasive approach to deep intraparenchymal and intraventricular brain tumors. The authors intended to evaluate the predictive value of SSEP monitoring during resection of intracranial brain tumors using a parallel endoscopic technique. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of patients operated on from 2007-2010 utilizing IONM in whom endoscopic ports were used to remove either intraparenchymal or intraventricular tumors. Cases were eligible for review if an endoscopic port was used to resect an intracranial tumor and the electronic chart included all intraoperative monitoring data as well as pre- and post-operative neurologic exams. Results 139 EPS cases met criteria for inclusion. Eighty five patients (61%) had intraparenchymal and fifty four (39%) had intraventricular tumors or colloid cysts. SSEP changes were seen in eleven cases (7.9%), being irreversible in three (2.2%) and reversible in eight cases (5.8%). Seven patients (5.0%) with intraparenchymal tumors had SSEP changes which met our criterea for significant changes while there were four (2.9%) with intraventricular (p-value=0.25). Five patients suffered post operative deficits, two reversible and two irreversible SSEP changes. Only one case exhibited post operative hemiparesis with no SSEP changes. The positive predictive value of SSEP was 45.4% and the negative predictive value was 99.2%. Conclusions Based on the high negative and low positive predictive values, the utility of SSEP monitoring for cylindrical port resections may be limited. However, the use of SSEP monitoring can be helpful in reducing the impact of endoscopic port manipulation when the tumor is closer to the somatosensory pathway.
참고문헌 (33)
- Bejjani GK, "The predictive value of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring: review of 244 procedures", Neurosurgery, 43, pp.491~498 (1998)
- Wiedemayer H, "False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports", Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 75, pp.280~286 (2004)
- Wilber RG, "Postoperative neurological deficits in segmental spinal instrumentation. A study using spinal cord monitoring", The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 66, pp.1178~1187 (1984)
- Jones SJ, "A system for the electrophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during operations for scoliosis", The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 65, pp.134~139 (1983)
- Brown RH, "Cortical evoked potential monitoring. A system for intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 9, pp.256~261 (1984)
- Bradshaw K, "Clinical evaluation of spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 9, pp.636~643 (1984)
- Kombos T, "Impact of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring on surgery of high-grade gliomas", Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 26, pp.422~425 (2009)
- Gentili F, "Monitoring of sensory evoked potentials during surgery of skull base tumours", Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 12, pp.336~340 (1985)
- De Vleeschauwer P, "Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials in carotid surgery: results, usefulness and limitations of the method", Annals of Vascular Surgery, 2, pp.63~68 (1988)
- Stejskal L, "Experience of 500 cases of neurophysiological monitoring in carotid endarterectomy", Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien), 149, pp.681~688 (2007)
- Lopéz JR, "The use of electrophysiological monitoring in the intraoperative management of intracranial aneurysms", Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 66, pp.189~196 (1999)
- Friedman WA, "Evoked potential monitoring during aneurysm operation: observations after fifty cases", Neurosurgery, 20, pp.678~687 (1987)
- Lam AM, "Monitoring electrophysiologic function during carotid endarterectomy: a comparison of somatosensory evoked potentials and conventional electroencephalogram", Anesthesiology, 75, pp.15~21 (1991)
- Schwartz DM, "Neurophysiological identification of position-induced neurologic injury during anterior cervical spine surgery", Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 20, pp.437~444 (2006)
- Kamel IR, "The use of somatosensory evoked potentials to determine the relationship between patient positioning and impending upper extremity nerve injury during spine surgery: a retrospective analysis", Anesthesia & Analgesia, 102, pp.1538~1542 (2006)
- Chung I, "Upper-limb somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in lumbosacral spine surgery: a prognostic marker for position-related ulnar nerve injury", The Spine Journal, 9, pp.287~295 (2009)
- Schwartz DM, "Prevention of positional brachial plexopathy during surgical correction of scoliosis", Journal of Spinal Disorders, 13, pp.178~182 (2000)
- Kassam AB, "Completely endoscopic resection of intraparenchymal brain tumors", Journal of Neurosurgery, 110, pp.116~123 (2009)
- Harris AE, "Microsurgical removal of intraventricular lesions using endoscopic visualization and stereotactic guidance", Neurosurgery, 56(1 Suppl), pp.125~132 (2005)
- Engh JA, "Stereotactically guided endoscopic port surgery for intraventricular tumor and colloid cyst resection", Neurosurgery, 67(3 Suppl Operative), pp.ons198~ons204 (2010)
- Thirumala PD, "Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during endoscopic endonasal approach to skull base surgery: analysis of observed changes", Neurosurgery, 69(1 Suppl Operative), pp.ons64~ons76 (2011)
- York DH, "Response variability of somatosensory evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 12, pp.864~876 (1987)
- Chen ZY, "Variability of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery", Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 17, pp.470~476 (2004)
- Balzer JR, "Simultaneous somatosensory evoked potential and electromyographic recordings during lumbosacral decompression and instrumentation", Neurosurgery, 42, pp.1318~1324 (1998)
- Mizoi K, "Permissible temporary occlusion time in aneurysm surgery as evaluated by evoked potential monitoring", Neurosurgery, 33, pp.434~440 (1993)
- Branston NM, "Relationship between the cortical evoked potential and local cortical blood flow following acute middle cerebral artery occlusion in the baboon", Experimental Neurology, 45, pp.195~208 (1974)
- Astrup J, "Cortical evoked potential and extracellular K+ and H+ at critical levels of brain ischemia", Stroke, 8, pp.51~57 (1977)
- Lopez JR, "Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring", International Anesthesiology Clinics, 34, pp.33~54 (1996)
- Symon L, "The relationship between CBF, evoked potentials and the clinical features in cerebral ischaemia", Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum, 78, pp.175~190 (1980)
- Branston NM, "Reversibility of ischaemically induced changes in extracellular potassium in primate cortex", Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 37, pp.37~49 (1978)
- Nuwer MR, "Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey", Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96, pp.6~11 (1995)
- Nuwer MR, "Spinal cord monitoring", Muscle & Nerve, 22, pp.1620~1630 (1999)
- Macdonald DB, "Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update", Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 20, pp.347~377 (2006)