본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Monitoring of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials During Spine Surgery: Intraoperative Changes and Postoperative Outcomes

김대현|윤서연|박윤길|Shin Hye Chang
대한재활의학회 (Korean Academy Of Rehabilitation Medicine)|2016.06|Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine|제40권 제3호|pp. 470-480

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

SpineIntraoperative neurophysiological monitoringMotor evoked potentialsSomatosensory evoked potentials
주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective To evaluate whether the combination of muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) measured during spinal surgery can predict immediate and permanent postoperative motor deficits.Methods mMEP and SEP was monitored in patients undergoing spinal surgery between November 2012 and July 2014. mMEPs were elicited by a train of transcranial electrical stimulation over the motor cortex and recorded from the upper/lower limbs. SEPs were recorded by stimulating the tibial and median nerves.Results Combined mMEP/SEP recording was successfully achieved in 190 operations. In 117 of these, mMEPs and SEPs were stable and 73 showed significant changes. In 20 cases, motor deficits in the first 48 postoperative hours were observed and 6 patients manifested permanent neurological deficits. The two potentials were monitored in a number of spinal surgeries. For surgery on spinal deformities, the sensitivity and specificity of combined mMEP/SEP monitoring were 100% and 92.4%, respectively. In the case of spinal cord tumor surgeries, sensitivity was only 50% but SEP changes were observed preceding permanent motor deficits in some cases.Conclusion Intraoperative monitoring is a useful tool in spinal surgery. For spinal deformity surgery, combined mMEP/SEP monitoring showed high sensitivity and specificity; in spinal tumor surgery, only SEP changes predicted permanent motor deficits. Therefore, mMEP, SEP, and joint monitoring may all be appropriate and beneficial for the intraoperative monitoring of spinal surgery.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate whether the combination of muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) measured during spinal surgery can predict immediate and permanent postoperative motor deficits.Methods mMEP and SEP was monitored in patients undergoing spinal surgery between November 2012 and July 2014. mMEPs were elicited by a train of transcranial electrical stimulation over the motor cortex and recorded from the upper/lower limbs. SEPs were recorded by stimulating the tibial and median nerves.Results Combined mMEP/SEP recording was successfully achieved in 190 operations. In 117 of these, mMEPs and SEPs were stable and 73 showed significant changes. In 20 cases, motor deficits in the first 48 postoperative hours were observed and 6 patients manifested permanent neurological deficits. The two potentials were monitored in a number of spinal surgeries. For surgery on spinal deformities, the sensitivity and specificity of combined mMEP/SEP monitoring were 100% and 92.4%, respectively. In the case of spinal cord tumor surgeries, sensitivity was only 50% but SEP changes were observed preceding permanent motor deficits in some cases.Conclusion Intraoperative monitoring is a useful tool in spinal surgery. For spinal deformity surgery, combined mMEP/SEP monitoring showed high sensitivity and specificity; in spinal tumor surgery, only SEP changes predicted permanent motor deficits. Therefore, mMEP, SEP, and joint monitoring may all be appropriate and beneficial for the intraoperative monitoring of spinal surgery.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Szelenyi A, "Monitoring of muscle motor evoked potentials during cerebral aneurysm surgery:intraoperative changes and postoperative outcome", J Neurosurg, 105, pp.675~681 (2006)
  2. Kothbauer K, "Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring for intramedullary surgery: an essential adjunct", Pediatr Neurosurg, 26, pp.247~254 (1997)
  3. Sala F, "Surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: the role of intraoperative (neurophysiological) monitoring", Eur Spine J, 16(2), pp.S130~S139 (2007)
  4. Pelosi L, "Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery", Clin Neurophysiol, 113, pp.1082~1091 (2002)
  5. 최일, "Combined Muscle Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumour Surgery", Yonsei Medical Journal, 55(4), pp.1063~1071 (2014), 연세대학교의과대학[DOI]
  6. Macdonald DB, "Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: overview and update", J Clin Monit Comput, 20, pp.347~377 (2006)
  7. Legatt AD, "Current practice of motor evoked potential monitoring: results of a survey", J Clin Neurophysiol, 19, pp.454~460 (2002)
  8. Kundnani VK, "Multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring in corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation of 354consecutive cases", Indian J Orthop, 44, pp.64~72 (2010)
  9. Deutsch H, "Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in anterior thoracic vertebrectomy", J Neurosurg, 92(2 Suppl), pp.155~161 (2000)
  10. Hilibrand AS, "Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86-A, pp.1248~1253 (2004)
  11. Weinzierl MR, "Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring: intra- and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations", Neurosurg Rev, 30, pp.109~116 (2007)
  12. Lall RR, "Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist", Neurosurg Focus, 33, pp.E10~ (2012)
  13. Garcia RM, "Detection of postoperative neurologic deficits using somatosensory-evoked potentials alone during posterior cervical laminoplasty", Spine J, 10, pp.890~895 (2010)
  14. Toleikis JR, "Spinally elicited peripheral nerve responses are sensory rather than motor", Clin Neurophysiol, 111, pp.736~742 (2000)
  15. Minahan RE, "Anterior spinal cord injury with preserved neurogenic ‘motor’ evoked potentials", Clin Neurophysiol, 112, pp.1442~1450 (2001)
  16. Deletis V, "Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts", Clin Neurophysiol, 119, pp.248~264 (2008)
  17. Malhotra NR, "Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring in spine surgery", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 35, pp.2167~2179 (2010)
  18. Modi HN, "False-negative transcranial motor-evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery causing paralysis: a case report with literature review", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 34, pp.E896~E900 (2009)
  19. Bhagat S, "An evaluation of multimodal spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery: a single centre experience of 354 operations", Eur Spine J, 24, pp.1399~1407 (2015)
  20. Zhuang Q, "How to make the best use of intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring? Experience in 1162consecutive spinal deformity surgical procedures", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 39, pp.E1425~E1432 (2014)
  21. Garces-Ambrossi GL, "Factors associated with progression-free survival and long-term neurological outcome after resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: analysis of 101 consecutive cases", J Neurosurg Spine, 11, pp.591~599 (2009)
  22. Sala F, "Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study", Neurosurgery, 58, pp.1129~1143 (2006)
  23. Hsu W, "Intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: can we do it without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring?", Childs Nerv Syst, 26, pp.241~245 (2010)
  24. Langeloo DD, "Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity:a study of 145 patients", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 28, pp.1043~1050 (2003)
  25. Park P, "Impact of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during correction of symptomatic cervical or cervicothoracic kyphosis", J Neurosurg Spine, 14, pp.99~105 (2011)
  26. Lee JY, "Characterization of neurophysiologic alerts during anterior cervical spine surgery", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 31, pp.1916~1922 (2006)
  27. Sutter M, "The validity of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) in surgery of 109 spine and spinal cord tumors", Eur Spine J, 16(2), pp.S197~S208 (2007)
  28. Haghighi SS, "Suppression of motor evoked potentials by inhalation anesthetics", J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2, pp.73~78 (1990)
  29. Chen Z, "The effects of isoflurane and propofol on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery", J Clin Monit Comput, 18, pp.303~308 (2004)
  30. Lotto ML, "Effects of anesthetic agents and physiologic changes on intraoperative motor evoked potentials", J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 16, pp.32~42 (2004)
  31. Huotari AM, "Evoked EEG patterns during burst suppression with propofol", Br J Anaesth, 92, pp.18~24 (2004)
  32. Skinner SA, "The initial use of free-running electromyography to detect early motor tract injury during resection of intramedullary spinal cord lesions", Neurosurgery, 56(2 Suppl), pp.299~314 (2005)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)

Factors Associated With Upper Extremity Functional Recovery Following Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke Patients김서영, 신성봉, 현정근, 이성재, 김태욱pp. 373-382Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials of Lower Limbs Can Prognosticate Ambulation in Hemiplegic Stroke PatientsSungju Jee, Hyunkeun Lee, Pyoungsik Hwang, Min Kyun Sohnpp. 383-391Association Between a Polymorphism (rs2071214) in Baculoviral IAP Repeat Containing 5 Gene (BIRC5) and Ischemic Stroke in Korean Population전진만, 김동환, 여진아, 윤동환, 김수강, 정성준, 이승아, 정주호, 김희상, 박해정, 유승돈pp. 392-400Effects of Adjuvant Mental Practice on Affected Upper Limb Function Following a Stroke: Results of Three-Dimensional Motion Analysis, Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity and Motor Activity LogsHyun Seung Oh, Eun Joo Kim, Soo Jeong Kim, 김두영pp. 401-411Predictors of Depressive Mood in Patients With Isolated Cerebellar Stroke: A Retrospective StudyDong Jin Koh, 김용욱, 김나영pp. 412-419
원문 보기