본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Clinical Usefulness of Intraoperative Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring during Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgery

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background and Purpose We aimed to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring focused on the transcranial motor-evoked potential (MEP) in patients with medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Methods We compared postoperative neurological deficits in patients who underwent TLE surgery with or without transcranial MEPs combined with somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring between January 1995 and June 2018. Transcranial motor stimulation was performed using subdermal electrodes, and MEP responses were recorded in the four extremity muscles. A decrease of more than 50% in the MEP or the SSEP amplitudes compared with baseline was used as a warning criterion. Results In the TLE surgery group without MEP monitoring, postoperative permanent motor deficits newly developed in 7 of 613 patients. In contrast, no permanent motor deficit occurred in 279 patients who received transcranial MEP and SSEP monitoring. Ten patients who exhibited decreases of more than 50% in the MEP amplitude recovered completely, although two cases showed transient motor deficits that recovered within 3 months postoperatively. Conclusions Intraoperative transcranial MEP monitoring during TLE surgery allowed the prompt detection and appropriate correction of injuries to the motor nervous system or ischemic stroke. Intraoperative transcranial MEP monitoring is a reliable modality for minimizing motor deficits in TLE surgery.

Abstract

Background and Purpose We aimed to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring focused on the transcranial motor-evoked potential (MEP) in patients with medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Methods We compared postoperative neurological deficits in patients who underwent TLE surgery with or without transcranial MEPs combined with somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring between January 1995 and June 2018. Transcranial motor stimulation was performed using subdermal electrodes, and MEP responses were recorded in the four extremity muscles. A decrease of more than 50% in the MEP or the SSEP amplitudes compared with baseline was used as a warning criterion. Results In the TLE surgery group without MEP monitoring, postoperative permanent motor deficits newly developed in 7 of 613 patients. In contrast, no permanent motor deficit occurred in 279 patients who received transcranial MEP and SSEP monitoring. Ten patients who exhibited decreases of more than 50% in the MEP amplitude recovered completely, although two cases showed transient motor deficits that recovered within 3 months postoperatively. Conclusions Intraoperative transcranial MEP monitoring during TLE surgery allowed the prompt detection and appropriate correction of injuries to the motor nervous system or ischemic stroke. Intraoperative transcranial MEP monitoring is a reliable modality for minimizing motor deficits in TLE surgery.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Wiebe S, "A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy", N Engl J Med, 345, pp.311~318 (2001)
  2. Engel J Jr, "The timing of surgical intervention for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy : a plan for a randomized clinical trial", Arch Neurol, 56, pp.1338~1341 (1999)
  3. Al-Otaibi F, "Surgical techniques for the treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy", Epilepsy Res Treat, 2012, pp.374848~ (2012)
  4. Muzumdar D, "Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy–An overview of surgical techniques", Int J Surg, 36, pp.411~419 (2016)
  5. Georgiadis I, "Temporal lobe resective surgery for medically intractable epilepsy : a review of complications and side effects", Epilepsy Res Treat, 2013, pp.752195~ (2013)
  6. 김성민, "Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring: Basic Principles and Recent Update", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 28(9), pp.1261~1269 (2013), 대한의학회
  7. Ichikawa T, "Utility and the limit of motor evoked potential monitoring for preventing complications in surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformation", Neurosurgery, 67(3 Suppl Operative), pp.ons222~ons228 (2010)
  8. Maruta Y, "Strategies and pitfalls of motor-evoked potential monitoring during supratentorial aneurysm surgery", J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 25, pp.484~495 (2016)
  9. Neuloh G, "Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery", Neurosurgery, 61(1Suppl), pp.337~346 (2007)
  10. Szelényi A, "Intraoperative motor evoked potential alteration in intracranial tumor surgery and its relation to signal alteration in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging", Neurosurgery, 67, pp.302~313 (2010)
  11. Mathon B, "Complications after surgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis", World Neurosurg, 102, pp.639.e2~650.e2 (2017)[DOI]
  12. Girvin JP, "Resection of intracranial lesions under local anesthesia", Int Anesthesiol Clin, 24, pp.133~155 (1986)
  13. Schuele SU, "Intractable epilepsy : management and therapeutic alternatives", Lancet Neurol, 7, pp.514~524 (2008)
  14. Spencer S, "Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in adults and children", Lancet Neurol, 7, pp.525~537 (2008)
  15. Erba G, "Temporal lobectomy for complex partial seizures that began in childhood", Surg Neurol, 38, pp.424~432 (1992)
  16. Heller AC, "Complications of epilepsy surgery in the first 8 years after neurosurgical training", Surg Neurol, 71, pp.631~637 (2009)
  17. Oertel J, "Neuronavigation and complication rate in epilepsy surgery", Neurosurg Rev, 27, pp.214~217 (2004)
  18. Kombos T, "Impact of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring on surgery of high-grade gliomas", J Clin Neurophysiol, 26, pp.422~425 (2009)
  19. Talacchi A, "Surgical treatment of high-grade gliomas in motor areas. The impact of different supportive technologies: a 171-patient series", J Neurooncol, 100, pp.417~426 (2010)
  20. Zhong J, "Brain retraction injury", Neurol Res, 25, pp.831~838 (2003)
  21. Lyon R, "Progressive suppression of motor evoked potentials during general anesthesia: the phenomenon of “anesthetic fade”", J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 17, pp.13~19 (2005)
  22. Abboud T, "Why does threshold level change in transcranial motor-evoked potentials during surgery for supratentorial lesions", J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 29, pp.393~399 (2017)
  23. MacDonald DB, "Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring", J Clin Neurophysiol, 19, pp.416~429 (2002)
  24. Legatt AD, "ACNS guideline : transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring", J Clin Neurophysiol, 33, pp.42~50 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

내측두엽 뇌전증 수술에서 수술 중 신경계감시로 내포 뇌경색증 조기발견백재승, 서수연, 이용덕, 이채영대한신경과학회 · 대한신경과학회지2020 · 제38권 제4호Limitation of Intraoperative Transcranial Electrical Stimulation-Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Brain Tumor Resection Adjacent to the Primary Motor Cortex김진욱, 도휘재, 박철기, 서한길, 오병모, 이승학, 최영두대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2018 · 제42권 제5호Monitoring of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials During Spine Surgery: Intraoperative Changes and Postoperative Outcomes김대현, 박윤길, 윤서연, Shin Hye Chang대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2016 · 제40권 제3호Intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory and visual evoked potentials for detecting posterior cerebral artery infarction during anteromesial temporal resectionChae Young Lee, Dong Jun Kim, Suyeon Seo대한임상신경생리학회 · Annals of Clinical Neurophysiology2020 · 제22권 제2호Intraoperative Monitoring of Hypoglossal Nerve Using Hypoglossal Motor Evoked Potential in Infratentorial Tumor Surgery: A Report of Two Cases김기원, 김승연, 김용휘, 김진욱, 서한길, 임효원, 최영두대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2018 · 제42권 제2호Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine SurgeryPark Yoon Ghil대한근전도전기진단의학회 · 대한근전도 전기진단의학회지2025 · 제27권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (27건)