본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Korean ESL Writers' Vocabulary Usage Patterns in Cultural Comparison: A Corpus-Based Analysis

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Writing activity generally requires multiple levels of language performance, from the grammar or vocabulary knowledge to the organization of thoughts, ideas, and views on topics. Therefore, writing samples can be good sources for researchers and practitioners to investigate the L2 writers' thoughts on certain topics. Twenty-four college-level Korean ESL learners’ expository writing samples, comparing the cultural differences between Korea and the U.S., are analyzed to identify the patterns and characteristics of the ESL writings. A corpus-based text analysis method is employed to investigate the writing samples both quantitatively and qualitatively with word frequency list, key words, and concordance. The results reveal that: (1) the writers use pronouns selectively depending on how they view and position themselves in the context of their own writings; (2) the writers show limited productive vocabulary in writing when expressing their thoughts; and (3) the Korean ESL writers tend to use gender-biased examples when comparing the Korean and American cultures. Implications of the findings and suggestions for writing instructions are also discussed.

Abstract

Writing activity generally requires multiple levels of language performance, from the grammar or vocabulary knowledge to the organization of thoughts, ideas, and views on topics. Therefore, writing samples can be good sources for researchers and practitioners to investigate the L2 writers' thoughts on certain topics. Twenty-four college-level Korean ESL learners’ expository writing samples, comparing the cultural differences between Korea and the U.S., are analyzed to identify the patterns and characteristics of the ESL writings. A corpus-based text analysis method is employed to investigate the writing samples both quantitatively and qualitatively with word frequency list, key words, and concordance. The results reveal that: (1) the writers use pronouns selectively depending on how they view and position themselves in the context of their own writings; (2) the writers show limited productive vocabulary in writing when expressing their thoughts; and (3) the Korean ESL writers tend to use gender-biased examples when comparing the Korean and American cultures. Implications of the findings and suggestions for writing instructions are also discussed.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Barnbrook, G., "Language and computers: A practical introduction to the computer analysis of language" (1996), Edinburgh University Press
  2. Choe, Y. P., "Culturally-loaded expressions in Korean EFL students' compositions", Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), pp.321~333 (2001)
  3. Conrad, S., "The importance of corpus-based research for language teachers", System, 27(1), pp.1~18 (1999)
  4. Fortanet, I., "The use of ‘we’ in university lectures: Reference and function", English for Specific Purposes, 23(1), pp.45~66 (2004)
  5. Grabe, W., "Theory & practice of writing" (1996), Longman
  6. Hinkel, E., "Second language writers' text" (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum
  7. Hyland, K., "Authority and visibility: Authorial identity in academic writing", Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), pp.1091~1112 (2002)
  8. Hyland, K., "Genre and second language writing" (2004), The University of Michigan Press
  9. Kamio, A., "English generic we, you, and they: An analysis in terms of territory of information", Journal of Pragmatics, 33(7), pp.1111~1124 (2001)
  10. Kaplan, R. B., "Cultural thought patterns revisited. in : Writing languages: Analysis of L2 text", pp.9~21 (1987), Addison-Wesley
  11. 김희진, "The Use of lovely in Korean English Textbooks: Comparing American and British Corpus", 영어교과교육, 9(1), pp.1~22 (2010), 한국영어교과교육학회
  12. Kim, K. H., "The development of English curriculum for teaching culture", Journal of the Korean English Education Society, 7(2), pp.17~37 (2008)
  13. Koller, V., "Computer applications in critical discourse analysis. in : Applying English grammar: Functional and corpus approaches", pp.216~228 (2004), Arnold
  14. Louw, B., "Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer: The diagnostic potential of semantic prosody. in : Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair", pp.157~174 (1993), John Benjamins
  15. Manning, C. D., "Foundations of statistical natural language processing" (1999), The MIT Press
  16. Melka, F., "Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. in : Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy", pp.84~102 (1997), Cambridge University Press
  17. Nam, D., "ESL writers' vocabulary choices in cultural contrasts", Paper presented at the 7th Symposium on Second Language Writing (2008), Purdue University
  18. Nation, I. S. P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  19. Nation, I. S. P., "Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques" (2008), Heinle, Cengage Learning
  20. Park, T. H., "Korean EFL writers difficulties with sentence cohesion and vocabulary use", 박사, pp.2004
  21. Reppen, R., "American National Corpus (ANC) Second Release" (2005), Linguistic Data Consortium
  22. Scott, M., (2008), Lexical Analysis Software
  23. Scott, M., "Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education" (2006), John Benjamins
  24. Sinclair, J., "Corpus, concordance, collocation" (1991), Oxford University Press
  25. Stubbs, M., "Text and corpus analysis" (1996), Blackwell
  26. Zimmerman, C. B., "Word knowledge: A vocabulary teacher's handbook" (2009), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)