본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Trueness Assessment for Serum Glucose Measurement Using Commercial Systems through the Preparation of Commutable Reference Materials

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background: Commutable reference materials (RMs) are suitable for end-users for evaluating the metrological traceability of values obtained using routine measurement systems. We assessed the performance of 6 routine measurement systems with validated secondary RMs. Methods: We tested the homogeneity, stability, and commutability of 5 minimally processed human serum pools according to the standard guidelines. The serum pools were assigned values as per the reference procedure of the United States Centers for Disease Control and were used to evaluate the trueness of results from 6 commercial measurement systems based on enzymatic methods: 3 glucose oxidase (GOD) and 3 hexokinase (HK) methods. Results: The prepared RMs were validated to be sufficiently homogenous, stable, and commutable with the patient samples. Method bias varied for different systems: GOD01, -0.17 to 2.88%; GOD02, 1.66 to 4.58%; GOD03, -0.17 to 3.14%; HK01, -3.48 to -0.85%; HK02, -3.83 to -0.11%, and HK03, -1.82 to -0.27%. Conclusions: We observed that the prepared serum glucose RMs were qualified for trueness assessment. Most of the measurement systems met the minimal quality specifications.

Abstract

Background: Commutable reference materials (RMs) are suitable for end-users for evaluating the metrological traceability of values obtained using routine measurement systems. We assessed the performance of 6 routine measurement systems with validated secondary RMs. Methods: We tested the homogeneity, stability, and commutability of 5 minimally processed human serum pools according to the standard guidelines. The serum pools were assigned values as per the reference procedure of the United States Centers for Disease Control and were used to evaluate the trueness of results from 6 commercial measurement systems based on enzymatic methods: 3 glucose oxidase (GOD) and 3 hexokinase (HK) methods. Results: The prepared RMs were validated to be sufficiently homogenous, stable, and commutable with the patient samples. Method bias varied for different systems: GOD01, -0.17 to 2.88%; GOD02, 1.66 to 4.58%; GOD03, -0.17 to 3.14%; HK01, -3.48 to -0.85%; HK02, -3.83 to -0.11%, and HK03, -1.82 to -0.27%. Conclusions: We observed that the prepared serum glucose RMs were qualified for trueness assessment. Most of the measurement systems met the minimal quality specifications.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. American Diabetes Association, "Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010", Diabetes Care, 33(S1), pp.S11~S61 (2010)
  2. Genter PM, "Accuracy of plasma glucose measurements in the hypoglycemic range", Diabetes Care, 17, pp.595~598 (1994)
  3. Thienpont LM, "Pilot external quality assessment survey for post-market vigilance of in vitro diagnostic medical devices and investigation of trueness of participants’ results", Clin Chem Lab Med, 41, pp.183~186 (2003)
  4. Gambino R, "Glucose: a simple molecule that is not simple to quantify", Clin Chem, 53, pp.2040~2041 (2007)
  5. Jansen R, "Trueness verification and traceability assessment of results from commercial systems for measurement of six enzyme activities in serum: an international study in the EC4 framework of the Calibration 2000 project", Clin Chim Acta, 368, pp.160~167 (2006)
  6. Xia C, "Application of five frozen human-pooled serum samples assigned by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine reference procedure in a traceability investigation of gamma-glutamyltransferase catalytic concentration measurements in China", Ann Clin Biochem, 47, pp.189~194 (2010)
  7. Henriksen GM, "Minimally processed fresh frozen human reference sera: preparation, testing, and application to international external quality assurance", Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 64, pp.293~308 (2004)
  8. Linsinger T, "Homogeneity and stability of reference materials", Accred Qual Assur, 6, pp.20~25 (2001)
  9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)., "Characterization and qualification of commutable reference materials for laboratory medicine, In Approved guideline, C53-A", Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, ~ (2010)
  10. Infusino I, "Commutability of the ERMDA470 reference material for two assays measuring serum albumin using immunochemical principles", Clin Chem Lab Med, 49, pp.1383~1384 (2011)
  11. glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase procedure for use as a national glucose reference method, "Development and evaluation of a hexokinase", pp.1976, Neese J
  12. "RELA-IFCC External Quality assessment scheme for Reference Laboratories in Laboratory Medicine"[URL]
  13. Snedecor G, "Statistical methods. 8th ed", pp.278~280 (1989), Iowa State University Press
  14. Pauwels J, "Evaluation of uncertatinty of reference materials", Accred Qual Assur, 5, pp.95~99 (2000)
  15. Passing H, "A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part I", J Clin Chem Clin Biochem, 21, pp.709~720 (1983)
  16. Fraser C, "Biological Variation: From Principles to Practice" (2001), AACC Press
  17. Miller WG, "State of the art in trueness and interlaboratory harmonization for 10 analytes in general clinical chemistry", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 132, pp.838~846 (2008)
  18. Lee W, "Trueness assessment of Korean nation-wide glucose proficiency testing", Clin Chem Lab Med, 49, pp.1061~1064 (2011)
  19. Pedersen MM, "The Nordic Trueness Project 2002: use of reference measurement procedure values in a general clinical chemistry survey", Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 64, pp.309~320 (2004)
  20. Ricós C, "Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress", Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 59, pp.491~500 (1999)
  21. Fraser CG, "Proposals for setting generally applicable quality goals solely based on biology", Ann Clin Biochem, 34, pp.8~12 (1997)
  22. Brion E, "Evaluation of commutability of control materials", Clin Chem Lab Med, 40, pp.625~630 (2002)
  23. Gubern G, "Determination of alpha-amylase activity: methods comparison and commutability study of several control materials", Clin Chem, 41, pp.435~438 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

Two Evaluation Budgets for the Measurement Uncertainty of Glucose in Clinical ChemistryHui Chen, Ling Zhang, Xiaoling Deng, Xiaoyun Bi대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2011 · 제31권 제3호Can Reference Materials Prepared Following CLSI C37-A Be Utilized Without Commutability Assessment? Perspectives Based on Lipid MeasurementsAn Dongheui, Cho Chan-Ik, Choi Qute, Kim Jeong-Ho, Kim Sollip, Kwon Gye Cheol, Lee Sang-Guk, Park Pil-Whan, Seo Jong Do, Song Junghan, Yun Yeo Min대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2025 · 제45권 제6호Assessment of the Trueness and Inter-Laboratory Precision of Routine Uric Acid Assays Using 4 Frozen Pooled Serum Samples Measured by the Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry’s HPLC MethodGuoBing Xu, Ou Liu, Yaping Jiang대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2014 · 제34권 제2호Commutability Assessment of Candidate External Quality Assessment Materials for Aminotransferase Activity Measurements Based on Different Approaches in ChinaChuanbao Zhang, Haijian Zhao, Long Qichen, Meng Wang, Qi Tianqi, Wang Jing, Wei Huang, Wenxiang Chen, Ying Yan, Zeng Jie, Zhang Tianjiao대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2021 · 제41권 제1호Practical Considerations for Clinical Laboratories in Top-down Approach for Assessing the Measurement Uncertainty of Clinical Chemistry Analytes전사일, Gu Hyunjung, Hong Jinyoung, Lee Juhee, Lee Woochang, Lee Woo-In, Min Won-Ki, Yun Yeo-Min대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2022 · 제42권 제6호Periodic Comparability Verification and Within-Laboratory Harmonization of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Results at a Large Healthcare Center With Multiple InstrumentsJun Sun-Hee, Kim Sung Min, Lee Joon Hee, Lee Kyunghoon, Nam Youngwon, Song Junghan, Song Sang Hoon대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2022 · 제42권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)