본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Improvement in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Comparison of Cortical Stimulation Parameters

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background and Purpose Intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathways is a routine procedure for ensuring the integrity of descending motor tracts during spinal surgery. Intraoperative motor evoked potential improvement (MEPI) may be associated with a better postsurgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). To compare the efficacy of two cortical stimulation parameters in eliciting MEPI intraoperatively during CSM surgery. Methods We studied 69 patients who underwent decompression surgery for CSM over a 9-month period using either 5 (Group 1) or 9 (Group 2) stimuli. MEPI was defined as the increase in the amplitude of MEPs from baseline at the end of CSM surgery just prior to skin closure. Results An MEPI of 100% from baseline was observed in 10 patients (53%) in Group 1 and 36 patients (72%) in Group 2. Comparisons of the baseline mean MEP amplitudes of muscles bilaterally between Groups 1 and 2 did not reveal any significant differences. Supramaximal stimulation showed that a significantly higher mean intensity was required for Group 1 than for Group 2. Conclusions MEPI is observed in a much larger proportion of cervical decompression surgery cases than previously thought. Intraoperative MEPI with longer-train cortical stimulation may reflect adequacy of decompression and provide additional guidance for the surgical procedure.

Abstract

Background and Purpose Intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathways is a routine procedure for ensuring the integrity of descending motor tracts during spinal surgery. Intraoperative motor evoked potential improvement (MEPI) may be associated with a better postsurgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). To compare the efficacy of two cortical stimulation parameters in eliciting MEPI intraoperatively during CSM surgery. Methods We studied 69 patients who underwent decompression surgery for CSM over a 9-month period using either 5 (Group 1) or 9 (Group 2) stimuli. MEPI was defined as the increase in the amplitude of MEPs from baseline at the end of CSM surgery just prior to skin closure. Results An MEPI of 100% from baseline was observed in 10 patients (53%) in Group 1 and 36 patients (72%) in Group 2. Comparisons of the baseline mean MEP amplitudes of muscles bilaterally between Groups 1 and 2 did not reveal any significant differences. Supramaximal stimulation showed that a significantly higher mean intensity was required for Group 1 than for Group 2. Conclusions MEPI is observed in a much larger proportion of cervical decompression surgery cases than previously thought. Intraoperative MEPI with longer-train cortical stimulation may reflect adequacy of decompression and provide additional guidance for the surgical procedure.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Montgomery DM, "Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinical syndrome and natural history", Orthop Clin North Am, 23, pp.487~493 (1992)
  2. Hochman M, "Cervical spondylotic myelopathy : a review", Internet J Neurol, 4, pp.24~42 (2005)
  3. Dong Y, "Compensatory cerebral adaptations before and evolving changes after surgical decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy", J Neurosurg Spine, 9, pp.538~551 (2008)
  4. Holly LT, "Cortical reorganization in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy", J Neurosurg Spine, 6, pp.544~551 (2007)
  5. Green A, "Cortical reorganization is associated with surgical decompression of cervical spondylotic myelopathy", Neural Plast, 2015, pp.389531~ (2015)
  6. Lo YL, "Systematic correlation of transcranial magnetic stimulation and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 29, pp.1137~1145 (2004)
  7. Lo YL, "Transcranial magnetic stimulation screening for cord compression in cervical spondylosis", J Neurol Sci, 244, pp.17~21 (2006)
  8. Lo YL, "Intraoperative monitoring study of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials in scoliosis surgery", Eur Spine J, 15(Suppl 5), pp.656~660 (2006)
  9. Lo YL, "The value of bilateral ipsilateral and contralateral motor evoked potential monitoring in scoliosis surgery", Eur Spine J, 17(Suppl 2), pp.S236~S238 (2008)
  10. Lo YL, "Motor and somatosensory abnormalities are significant etiological factors for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis", J Neurol Sci, 359, pp.117~123 (2015)
  11. Wang S, "Prognostic value of intraoperative MEP signal improvement during surgical treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy", Eur Spine J, 25, pp.1875~1880 (2016)
  12. Park MK, "The effect of positive changes during intraoperative monitoring of the functional improvement in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy", Clin Interv Aging, 13, pp.1211~1218 (2018)
  13. Lo Y, "Clinical and physiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation position on motor evoked potentials in scoliosis surgery", Scoliosis, 5, pp.3~ (2010)
  14. Lo YL, "Intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring in scoliosis surgery : comparison of desflurane", nitrous oxide with propofol total intravenous anesthetic regimens, 2006, pp.18, 211~214
  15. Burke D, "Surgical monitoring of motor pathways", J Clin Neurophysiol, 15, pp.194~205 (1998)
  16. Deletis V, "Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery : a review focus on the corticospinal tracts", Clin Neurophysiol, 119, pp.248~264 (2008)
  17. Haghighi SS, "Repetitive vs. single transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of motor conduction in spine surgery", Mo Med, 100, pp.262~265 (2003)
  18. Journée HL, "Improved neuromonitoring during spinal surgery using double-train transcranial electrical stimulation", Med Biol Eng Comput, 42, pp.110~113 (2004)
  19. Fouyas IP, "Cochrane review on the role of surgery in cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 27, pp.736~747 (2002)
  20. Wilson JR, "State of the art in degenerative cervical myelopathy : an update on current clinical evidence", Neurosurgery, 80, pp.S33~S45 (2017)
  21. Gerling MC, "Two-year results of the prospective spine treatment outcomes study: an analysis of complication rates, predictors of their development, and effect on patient derived outcomes at 2 years for surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy", World Neurosurg, 106, pp.247~253 (2017)
  22. Ryan K, "Motor network recovery in patients with chronic spinal cord compression : a longitudinal study following decompression surgery", J Neurosurg Spine, 28, pp.379~388 (2018)
  23. Kreitz T, "Prolonged preoperative weakness affects recovery of motor function after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 26, pp.67~73 (2018)
  24. Bhagavatula ID, "Functional cortical reorganization in cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and changes associated with surgery", Neurosurg Focus, 40, pp.E2~ (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

Monitoring of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials During Spine Surgery: Intraoperative Changes and Postoperative Outcomes김대현, 박윤길, 윤서연, Shin Hye Chang대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2016 · 제40권 제3호Increased Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potentials and Motor Recovery after Spinal Cord Tumor Removal고유정, 박윤길, 박진영, 표소은대한근전도전기진단의학회 · 대한근전도 전기진단의학회지2018 · 제20권 제2호Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine SurgeryPark Yoon Ghil대한근전도전기진단의학회 · 대한근전도 전기진단의학회지2025 · 제27권 제2호Intraoperative Motor-Evoked Potential Disappearance versus Amplitude-Decrement Alarm Criteria During Cervical Spinal Surgery: A Long-Term Prognosis김동건, 김성민, 김치헌, 박경석, 이광우, 정천기, 진승현, 최영두대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2017 · 제13권 제1호Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials According to Tumor Types박윤길, 박진영, 박태하, 이주원대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2017 · 제41권 제4호Relationship Between Motor Evoked Potential Response and the Severity of Paralysis in Spinal Cord Injury Patients김원석, 김혜리, 신형익, 오미경대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2017 · 제41권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)