본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Increased Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potentials and Motor Recovery after Spinal Cord Tumor Removal

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective: To evaluate whether the increase of the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during surgery can imply favorable prognosis postoperatively in spinal cord tumor surgery. Method: MEPs were monitored in patients who underwent spinal cord tumor surgery between March 2016 and March 2018. Amplitude changes at the end of monitoring compared to the baselines in limb muscle were analyzed. Minimum and maximum changes were set to MEPmin (%) and MEPmax (%). Strengths of bilateral 10 key muscles which were documented a day before (Motorpre), 48 h (Motor48h) and 4 weeks (Motor4wk) after the surgery were reviewed. Results: Difference of Motor48h from Motorpre (Motor48h-pre) and Motor4wk from Motorpre (Motor4wk-pre) positively correlated with MEPmin, suggesting that smaller the difference of MEPs amplitude, less recovery of muscle strength. There was a negative correlation between the amount of bleeding and MEPmin, indicating that the greater the amount of bleeding, the smaller the MEPmin, implying that MEPs amplitude is less likely to improve when the amount of bleeding is large. It also showed significant difference between patients with improved or no change of motor status and patients with motor deterioration after surgery according to anatomical tumor types. Conclusion: Improve of muscle strength was less when the increase of MEPs amplitude was small, and improvement of MEPs amplitude was less when the amount of bleeding was large. Correlation between changes of status of muscle strength after surgery and tumor types was observed. With amplitude increase in MEPs monitoring, restoration of muscle strength can be expected.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether the increase of the amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during surgery can imply favorable prognosis postoperatively in spinal cord tumor surgery. Method: MEPs were monitored in patients who underwent spinal cord tumor surgery between March 2016 and March 2018. Amplitude changes at the end of monitoring compared to the baselines in limb muscle were analyzed. Minimum and maximum changes were set to MEPmin (%) and MEPmax (%). Strengths of bilateral 10 key muscles which were documented a day before (Motorpre), 48 h (Motor48h) and 4 weeks (Motor4wk) after the surgery were reviewed. Results: Difference of Motor48h from Motorpre (Motor48h-pre) and Motor4wk from Motorpre (Motor4wk-pre) positively correlated with MEPmin, suggesting that smaller the difference of MEPs amplitude, less recovery of muscle strength. There was a negative correlation between the amount of bleeding and MEPmin, indicating that the greater the amount of bleeding, the smaller the MEPmin, implying that MEPs amplitude is less likely to improve when the amount of bleeding is large. It also showed significant difference between patients with improved or no change of motor status and patients with motor deterioration after surgery according to anatomical tumor types. Conclusion: Improve of muscle strength was less when the increase of MEPs amplitude was small, and improvement of MEPs amplitude was less when the amount of bleeding was large. Correlation between changes of status of muscle strength after surgery and tumor types was observed. With amplitude increase in MEPs monitoring, restoration of muscle strength can be expected.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Lall RR, "Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist", Neurosurg Focus, 33, pp.E10~ (2012)
  2. Magit DP, "Questionnaire study of neuromonitoring availability and usage for spine surgery", J Spinal Disord Tech, 20, pp.282~289 (2007)
  3. Park J-H, "Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spinal surgery", World Journal of Clinical Cases, 3, pp.765~773 (2015)
  4. Shin Hye Chang, "Monitoring of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials During Spine Surgery: Intraoperative Changes and Postoperative Outcomes", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(3), pp.470~480 (2016), 대한재활의학회
  5. Macdonald DB, "Four-limb muscle motor evoked potential and optimized somatosensory evoked potential monitoring with decussation assessment:results in 206 thoracolumbar spine surgeries", Eur Spine J, 16(Suppl 2), pp.S171~S187 (2007)
  6. MacDonald DB, "Monitoring scoliosis surgery with combined multiple pulse transcranial electric motor and cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials from the lower and upper extremities", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 28, pp.194~203 (2003)
  7. 박태하, "Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials According to Tumor Types", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41(4), pp.610~620 (2017), 대한재활의학회
  8. MacDonald DB, "Overview on Criteria for MEP Monitoring", J Clin Neurophysiol, 34, pp.4~11 (2017)
  9. Pelosi L, "Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery", Clin Neurophysiol, 113, pp.1082~1091 (2002)
  10. Weinzierl MR, "Combined motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring : intra-and postoperative data in a series of 69 operations", Neurosurg Rev, 30, pp.109~116 (2007)
  11. Holdefer RN, "Somatosensory and motor evoked potentials as biomarkers for post-operative neurological status", Clin Neurophysiol, 126, pp.857~865 (2015)
  12. Kobayashi K, "Surgical outcomes of spinal cord and cauda equina ependymoma : Postoperative motor status and recurrence for each WHO grade in a multicenter study", J Orthop Sci, 23, pp.614~621 (2018)
  13. McGirt MJ, "Resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors in children : assessment of long-term motor and sensory deficits", J Neurosurg Pediatr, 1, pp.63~67 (2008)
  14. Liu JX, "Clinical analysis of 73 cases of intraspinal nerve sheath tumor", J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci, 33, pp.258~261 (2013)
  15. Ciappetta P, "Spinal meningiomas : prognosis and recovery factors in 22 cases with severe motor deficits", Acta Neurol Scand, 77, pp.27~30 (1988)
  16. Guérit J-M, "State-of-the-art of neuromonitoring for prevention of immediate and delayed paraplegia in thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta surgery", The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 74, pp.S1867~S1869 (2002)
  17. Astrup J, "Thresholds in cerebral ischemia-the ischemic penumbra", Stroke, 12, pp.723~725 (1981)
  18. Macdonald DB, "Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring-a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring", Clin Neurophysiol, 124, pp.2291~2316 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Spinal Cord Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials According to Tumor Types박윤길, 박진영, 박태하, 이주원대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2017 · 제41권 제4호Monitoring of Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials During Spine Surgery: Intraoperative Changes and Postoperative Outcomes김대현, 박윤길, 윤서연, Shin Hye Chang대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2016 · 제40권 제3호Detection of critical intratumoral hemorrhage during spine surgery by intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: a case report김성미, 서수연, 이정석, 허남진, Dae-Won Seo, Jehyun Ahn대한임상신경생리학회 · Annals of Clinical Neurophysiology2024 · 제26권 제2호Intraoperative Motor Evoked Potential Improvement in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Comparison of Cortical Stimulation ParametersChang Ming Guo, Lisa Zhu, Reuben C Soh, Yew Long Lo대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2020 · 제16권 제1호Limitation of Intraoperative Transcranial Electrical Stimulation-Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring During Brain Tumor Resection Adjacent to the Primary Motor Cortex김진욱, 도휘재, 박철기, 서한길, 오병모, 이승학, 최영두대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2018 · 제42권 제5호Relationship Between Motor Evoked Potential Response and the Severity of Paralysis in Spinal Cord Injury Patients김원석, 김혜리, 신형익, 오미경대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2017 · 제41권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)