Evaluation of Six Phenotypic Methods for the Detection of Carbapenemases in Gram-Negative Bacteria With Characterized Resistance Mechanisms
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: We compared the performance of the modified Hodge test (MHT), Triton Hodge test (THT), Carba NP test (CNPt), simplified Carba NP test (CNPt-direct), blue-Carba NP test (BCT), and carbapenem inactivation method (CIM) for rapid and accurate carbapenemase detection. Methods: The methods were evaluated by using 256 gram-negative isolates, including 197 Enterobacteriaceae (79 Enterobacter spp., 74 Klebsiella spp., 33 Escherichia coli, 10 Citrobacter spp., and 1 Serratia marcescens), 51 Acinetobacter baumannii, and 8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. The collection included 117 non-carbapenemase, 18 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC) producers, 46 New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDM) producers, 11 imipenemases (IMP) producers, and 51 oxacillinases (OXA) producers, and 13 strains harboring two different carbapenemase genes. Results: The specificity of the THT (91.5%) was significantly lower than other methods, each of which had 100% specificity (P<0.003). This can be attributed to the false detection of Ampler class C β-lactamases (AmpC) carriers. The CNPt-direct and CIM yielded the highest sensitivities (P<0.003), which were comparable (92.8% vs 93.5%, P>0.999). Because of improved detection of NDM carriers, THT showed significantly higher sensitivity than the MHT (84.9% vs 75.5%, P<0.001). However, poor performances in detecting OXA still influenced the sensitivities of the CNPt (66.2%) and BCT (82.0%), as well as the MHT and THT. Conclusions: CNPt-direct and CIM demonstrated the best performance for the efficient detection of carbapenemase among the six evaluated methods. Except the MHT and THT, the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae by all the other methods was acceptable, when the OXA-type carbapenemase was not prevalent.
Abstract
Background: We compared the performance of the modified Hodge test (MHT), Triton Hodge test (THT), Carba NP test (CNPt), simplified Carba NP test (CNPt-direct), blue-Carba NP test (BCT), and carbapenem inactivation method (CIM) for rapid and accurate carbapenemase detection. Methods: The methods were evaluated by using 256 gram-negative isolates, including 197 Enterobacteriaceae (79 Enterobacter spp., 74 Klebsiella spp., 33 Escherichia coli, 10 Citrobacter spp., and 1 Serratia marcescens), 51 Acinetobacter baumannii, and 8 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. The collection included 117 non-carbapenemase, 18 Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC) producers, 46 New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDM) producers, 11 imipenemases (IMP) producers, and 51 oxacillinases (OXA) producers, and 13 strains harboring two different carbapenemase genes. Results: The specificity of the THT (91.5%) was significantly lower than other methods, each of which had 100% specificity (P<0.003). This can be attributed to the false detection of Ampler class C β-lactamases (AmpC) carriers. The CNPt-direct and CIM yielded the highest sensitivities (P<0.003), which were comparable (92.8% vs 93.5%, P>0.999). Because of improved detection of NDM carriers, THT showed significantly higher sensitivity than the MHT (84.9% vs 75.5%, P<0.001). However, poor performances in detecting OXA still influenced the sensitivities of the CNPt (66.2%) and BCT (82.0%), as well as the MHT and THT. Conclusions: CNPt-direct and CIM demonstrated the best performance for the efficient detection of carbapenemase among the six evaluated methods. Except the MHT and THT, the detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae by all the other methods was acceptable, when the OXA-type carbapenemase was not prevalent.
참고문헌 (24)
- Bush K, "Epidemiological expansion, structural studies, and clinical challenges of new β-lactamases from gram-negative bacteria", Annu Rev Microbiol, 65, pp.455~478 (2011)
- Nordmann P, "Rapid detection of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae", J Clin Microbiol, 50, pp.3016~3022 (2012)
- Carattoli A, "Plasmids and the spread of resistance", Int J Med Microbiol, 303, pp.298~304 (2013)
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, "Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-fifth Informational supplement M100-S25" (2015), CLSI
- Pasteran F, "Triton Hodge test: improved protocol for modified Hodge test for enhanced detection of NDM and other carbapenemase producers", J Clin Microbiol, 54, pp.640~649 (2016)
- Dortet L, "Evaluation of the RAPIDEC® CARBA NP, the Rapid CARB Screen® and the Carba NP test for biochemical detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae", J Antimicrob Chemother, 70, pp.3014~3022 (2015)
- Pasteran F, "Simplified protocol for Carba NP test for enhanced detection of carbapenemase producers directly from bacterial cultures", J Clin Microbiol, 53, pp.3908~3911 (2015)
- Pires J, "Blue-carba, an easy biochemical test for detection of diverse carbapenemase producers directly from bacterial cultures", J Clin Microbiol, 51, pp.4281~4283 (2013)
- Pasteran F, "Evaluation of the Blue-Carba test for rapid detection of carbapenemases in gram-negative bacilli", J Clin Microbiol, 53, pp.1996~1998 (2015)
- van der Zwaluw K, "The carbapenem inactivation method (CIM), a simple and low-cost alternative for the Carba NP test to assess phenotypic carbapenemase activity in gram-negative rods", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0123690~ (2015)
- Yan Q, "Detection of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria using a simplified Carba NP test", J Microbiol Methods, 123, pp.1~3 (2016)
- Pires J, "Comparison of the in-house made Carba-NP and Blue-Carba tests: Considerations for better detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae", J Microbiol Methods, 122, pp.33~37 (2016)
- Tijet N, "Detection of carbapenemase activity in Enterobacteriaceae: comparison of the carbapenem inactivation method versus the Carba NP test", J Antimicrob Chemother, 71, pp.274~276 (2016)
- Poirel L, "Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes", Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 70, pp.119~123 (2011)
- Woodford N, "Multiplex PCR for genes encoding prevalent OXA carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp", Int J Antimicrob Agents, 27, pp.351~353 (2006)
- Zhang C, "Characterization of carbapenemases, extended spectrum β-lactamases, quinolone resistance and aminoglycoside resistance determinants in carbapenem-non-susceptible Escherichia coli from a teaching hospital in Chongqing, Southwest China", Infect Genet Evol, 27, pp.271~276 (2014)
- 김현기, "Further Modification of the Modified Hodge Test for Detecting Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 35(3), pp.298~305 (2015), 대한진단검사의학회
- Vasoo S, "Comparison of a novel, rapid chromogenic biochemical assay, the Carba NP test, with the modified Hodge test for detection of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacilli", J Clin Microbiol, 51, pp.3097~3101 (2013)
- Lifshitz Z, "Comparative study of a novel biochemical assay, the Rapidec Carba NP test, for detecting carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae", J Clin Microbiol, 54, pp.453~456 (2016)
- Desu MM, "Sample size methodology" (1990), Academic Press
- Heinrichs A, "Evaluation of several phenotypic methods for the detection of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa", Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 34, pp.1467~1474 (2015)
- Genc O, "The identification of carbapenemase types in Enterobacteriaceae by using molecular assay and phenotyping confirmation tests", J Microbiol Methods, 125, pp.8~11 (2016)
- Dortet L, "CarbAcineto NP test for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter spp", J Clin Microbiol, 52, pp.2359~2364 (2014)
- Bush K, "Epidemiological expansion, structural studies, and clinical challenges of new β-lactamases from gram-negative bacteria", Annu Rev Microbiol, 65, pp.455~478 (2011)