본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Reliability and Validity of the Short Form of the Literacy-Independent Cognitive Assessment in the Elderly

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background and Purpose The Literacy-Independent Cognitive Assessment (LICA) has been developed for a diagnosis of dementia and is a useful neuropsychological test battery for illiterate populations as well as literate populations. The objective of this study was to develop the short form of the LICA (S-LICA) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the S-LICA. Methods The subtests of the S-LICA were selected based on the factor analysis and validation study results of the LICA. Patients with dementia (n=101) and normal elderly controls (n=185)participated in this study. Results Cronbach’s coefficient alpha of the S-LICA was 0.92 for illiterate subjects and 0.94for literate subjects, and the item-total correlation ranged from 0.63 to 0.81 (p<0.01).The test-retest reliability of the S-LICA total score was high (r=0.94, p<0.001), and the subtests had high test-retest reliabilities (r=0.68-0.87, p<0.01). The correlation between the K-MMSE and S-LICA total scores were substantial in both the illiterate subjects (r=0.837, p<0.001) and the literate subjects(r=0.802, p<0.001). The correlation between the S-LICA and LICA was very high (r=0.989, p<0.001). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.999for the literate subjects and 0.985 for the illiterate subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the S-LICA for a diagnosis of dementia were 97% and 96% at the cutoff point of 72 for the literate subjects, and 96% and 93% at the cutoff point of 68 for the illiterate subjects, respectively. Conclusions Our results indicate that the S-LICA is a reliable and valid instrument for quick evaluation of patients with dementia in both illiterate and literate elderly populations.

Abstract

Background and Purpose The Literacy-Independent Cognitive Assessment (LICA) has been developed for a diagnosis of dementia and is a useful neuropsychological test battery for illiterate populations as well as literate populations. The objective of this study was to develop the short form of the LICA (S-LICA) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the S-LICA. Methods The subtests of the S-LICA were selected based on the factor analysis and validation study results of the LICA. Patients with dementia (n=101) and normal elderly controls (n=185)participated in this study. Results Cronbach’s coefficient alpha of the S-LICA was 0.92 for illiterate subjects and 0.94for literate subjects, and the item-total correlation ranged from 0.63 to 0.81 (p<0.01).The test-retest reliability of the S-LICA total score was high (r=0.94, p<0.001), and the subtests had high test-retest reliabilities (r=0.68-0.87, p<0.01). The correlation between the K-MMSE and S-LICA total scores were substantial in both the illiterate subjects (r=0.837, p<0.001) and the literate subjects(r=0.802, p<0.001). The correlation between the S-LICA and LICA was very high (r=0.989, p<0.001). The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.999for the literate subjects and 0.985 for the illiterate subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of the S-LICA for a diagnosis of dementia were 97% and 96% at the cutoff point of 72 for the literate subjects, and 96% and 93% at the cutoff point of 68 for the illiterate subjects, respectively. Conclusions Our results indicate that the S-LICA is a reliable and valid instrument for quick evaluation of patients with dementia in both illiterate and literate elderly populations.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. "EFA Global Monitoring Report 2011" (2011)[URL]
  2. Lee JY, "Illiteracy and the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease in the Yonchon county survey, Korea", International Psychogeriatrics, 20, pp.976~985 (2008)
  3. Choi SH, "Validation of the literacy independent cognitive assessment", International Psychogeriatrics, 23, pp.593~601 (2011)
  4. Morris JC, "The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules", Neurology, 43, pp.2412~2414 (1993)
  5. 강연욱, "K-MMSE(Korean-Mini Mental State Examination)의 노인 규준 연구", 한국심리학회지:일반, 25(2), pp.1~12 (2006), 한국심리학회
  6. Teng EL, "Neuropsychological testing: helpful or harmful?", Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 19, pp.267~271 (2005)
  7. Baek MJ, "Comparison between the story recall test and the word-list learning test in Korean patients with mild cognitive impairment and early stage of Alzheimer’s disease", Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34, pp.396~404 (2012)
  8. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV" (1994), American Psychiatric Association
  9. Christensen KJ, "A cognitive battery for dementia: development and measurement characteristics", Psychological Assessment, 3, pp.168~174 (1991)
  10. 강수진, "한국판 Instrumental Activities of Dalily Living의 타당도와 신뢰도", 대한신경과학회지, 20(1), pp.8~14 (2002), 대한신경과학회
  11. Shulman KI, "Clock-drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test?", International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, pp.548~561 (2000)
  12. Brodaty H, "The GPCOG: a new screening test for dementia designed for general practice", Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, pp.530~534 (2002)
  13. Borson S, "The mini-cog: a cognitive ‘vital signs’ measure for dementia screening in multi-lingual elderly", International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, pp.1021~1027 (2000)
  14. Nasreddine ZS, "The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment", Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, pp.695~699 (2005)
  15. Lee JY, "Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly outpatient clinic: validation of the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment", Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 21, pp.104~110 (2008)
  16. Solomon PR, "A 7 minute neurocognitive screening battery highly sensitive to Alzheimer’s disease", Archives of neurology, 55, pp.349~355 (1998)
  17. Storey JE, "The Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS): a multicultural cognitive assessment scale", International Psychogeriatrics, 16, pp.13~31 (2004)
  18. Folstein MF, "“Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician", Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, pp.189~198 (1975)
  19. Ismail Z, "Brief cognitive screening instruments: an update", International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25, pp.111~120 (2010)
  20. Ridha B, "The mini mental state examination", Practical Neurology, 5, pp.298~303 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

Normative Study of the Literacy Independent Cognitive Assessment in Illiterate and Literate Elderly Koreans강승걸, 고광필, 심용수, 유승호, 이동우, 이준영, 정지향, 조성진, 최성혜, 한설희대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2015 · 제12권 제3호Reliability and Validity of a Short Form of the Korean Dementia Screening Questionnaire-Cognition김상윤, 김세미, 김아로, 나승희, 박경원, 박기형, 박미선, 양동원, 윤영철, 이동우, 이준영, 이준홍, 임현우, 정지향, 최성혜, 한현정대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2020 · 제16권 제1호Constructing a Composite Score for the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core강연욱, 장승민, Duk L. Na대한치매학회 · Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders(대한치매학회지)2015 · 제14권 제4호Effect of Education on Discriminability of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Compared to Mini-Mental State ExaminationKang Yeonwook, Kim Byeong Chae, Kim Haeyoon, Park Jaesel, Yang Seonyeong, Yu Kyung-Ho대한치매학회 · Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders(대한치매학회지)2023 · 제22권 제2호Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Tablet-Based Seoul Cognitive Status Test: Evidence for Scalable Cognitive AssessmentAn Dayeong, Kim Hee Jin, Kim Young Ju, Na Duk L., Shin Joon Soo대한치매학회 · Dementia and Neurocognitive Disorders(대한치매학회지)2025 · 제24권 제4호Validation of a New Screening Tool for Dementia: The Simple Observation Checklist for Activities of Daily Living박기형, 박진세, 양영순, 이찬녕, 임재성, 장재원, 최호진대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2021 · 제17권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)