The Effects of Receptive vs. Productive Vocabulary Instruction: A Meta-analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
The purpose of this study was to synthesize research results on the effects of receptive instruction and productive instruction on vocabulary gains and retention, using the quantitative research technique of meta-analysis. A total of 18 primary studies were analyzed to observe the relative effectiveness of different types of vocabulary instruction (receptive vs. productive) and tasks (R0, R1, R2, P0, P1, P2) under those categories. The results showed that (a) little difference was found between receptive and productive instruction statistically, except that productive instruction had a long-term retention effect, (b) combined effect sizes for each category showed the pattern of P2 > R2 > P1 > R0 > R1 > P0; however, the differences among task types were modest, (c) productive instruction yielded higher effect size in productive vocabulary gains with receptive instruction yielding the same result in receptive vocabulary gains, and no statistically significant difference was found between the groups, and (d) the learning context of ESL and EFL, educational status, length of treatment, and the context of outcome measure were found to be moderator variables which affect the outcome of instruction in statistically significant ways.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to synthesize research results on the effects of receptive instruction and productive instruction on vocabulary gains and retention, using the quantitative research technique of meta-analysis. A total of 18 primary studies were analyzed to observe the relative effectiveness of different types of vocabulary instruction (receptive vs. productive) and tasks (R0, R1, R2, P0, P1, P2) under those categories. The results showed that (a) little difference was found between receptive and productive instruction statistically, except that productive instruction had a long-term retention effect, (b) combined effect sizes for each category showed the pattern of P2 > R2 > P1 > R0 > R1 > P0; however, the differences among task types were modest, (c) productive instruction yielded higher effect size in productive vocabulary gains with receptive instruction yielding the same result in receptive vocabulary gains, and no statistically significant difference was found between the groups, and (d) the learning context of ESL and EFL, educational status, length of treatment, and the context of outcome measure were found to be moderator variables which affect the outcome of instruction in statistically significant ways.
참고문헌 (37)
- Barcroft, J, "Effects of sentence writing in second language lexical acquisition", Second Language Research, 20, pp.303~334 (2004)
- Boggards, P., "Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing" (2004), John Benjamins
- Borenstein, M., (2005), Biostat
- "Introduction to meta-analysis"[URL]
- Bruning, R. H., "Cognitive psychology and instruction" (2004), Merrill
- 차지은, "The Effects of Extensive Reading on Enhancing Vocational High School Students’ L2 Vocabulary & Reading Rates", 영어교육, 64(3), pp.3~30 (2009), 한국영어교육학회
- Choi, Ji-Yoon, "The effect of receptive and productive tasks on lexical knowledge development", 석사, pp.2007
- Cohen, A. D, "Assessing language ability in the classroom" (1994), Heinle & Heinle
- Dekeyser, R. M., "The differential role of comprehension and production practice", Language Learning, 46(4), pp.613~642 (1996)
- Fuente, M. J, "Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, pp.81~112 (2002)
- Griffin, G. F., "List learning of second language vocabulary", Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, pp.443~460 (1996)
- Henriksen, B, "Three dimensions of vocabulary development", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, pp.303~317 (1999)
- "Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index"[URL]
- Hulstijn, J. H., "Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition", Language Learning, 51, pp.539~338 (2001)
- 강동호, "The Input vs. Output Instructions: Does It Work in Korean Primary School Contexts?", 초등영어교육, 10(1), pp.275~303 (2004), 한국초등영어교육학회
- 김성연, "한국 학생들의 영어 어휘 사용 능력 향상을 위한 어휘 지도 방안과 학습 책략", 영어교육연구, 20(4), pp.237~259 (2008), 팬코리아영어교육학회
- Kim, Youngjoo, "Effects of different vocabulary learning tasks on Korean middle school students’ English vocabulary learning", 석사, pp.2008
- Kim, "Effects of Text Modification and Learning Condition on EFL Vocabulary Learning", 영어교육, 59(1), pp.59~84 (2004), 한국영어교육학회
- Laufer, B, "The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different", Applied Linguistics, 19, pp.255~271 (1998)
- "The Effects of Production and Comprehension for Focus on Form and Second Language Acquisition", 응용언어학, 19(2), pp.3~68 (2003), 한국응용언어학회
- Li, S, "The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis", Language Learning, 60(2), pp.309~365 (2010)
- Lipsey, M., "Practical meta-analysis" (2001), SGAE Publications
- Melka, F, "Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary, In Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy", pp.84~102 (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Mondria, J., "Receptive, productive and receptive + productive L2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make?, In Vocabulary in a second language: selection, acquisition, and testing", pp.79~102 (2004), John Benjamins
- Nation, I. S. P, "Teaching and learning vocabulary" (1990), Heinle & Heinle
- Nation, I. S. P, "Learning vocabulary in another language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Norris, J., "Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis", Language Learning, 50, pp.417~528 (2000)
- Oh, Seong-Sam, "Theory and practice of meta-analysis for synthesizing and analyzing the previous study results" (2002), Konkuk University Press
- Paribakht, T., "Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition, In Second language vocabulary acquisition", pp.174~200 (1997), Cambridge University Press
- 류영숙, "Effects of Two Types of Vocabulary Practice: Receptive and Productive", Foreign Languages Education, 16(1), pp.79~99 (2009), 한국외국어교육학회
- Son, Jungmi, "The Effects of Vocabulary Exercises on EFL Vocabulary Learning and Retention", 영어어문교육, 13(4), pp.167~192 (2007), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Stahl, S. A, "To teach a word well: A framework for vocabulary instruction", Reading World, 24, pp.16~27 (1985)
- Stahl, S. A., "A model-based meta-analysis", Review of Educational Research, 56(1), pp.72~110 (1986)
- Vidal, K, "Academic listening: A source of vocabulary acquisition", Applied Linguistics, 24(1), pp.56~89 (2003)
- Waring, R, "A study of receptive and productive learning from word cards", Studies in Foreign Languages and Literature, 21, pp.94~114 (1997)
- Webb, S, "Receptive and productive vocabulary learning", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, pp.33~52 (2005)
- 양은미, "The Effects of Different Pedagogical Tasks on L2 Vocabulary Learning", 영어어문교육, 14(4), pp.179~199 (2008), 한국영어어문교육학회
