본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Implications of the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification and International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasm in Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Excess Blasts and Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

The fifth edition of the WHO classification (2022 WHO) and the International Consensus Classification (2022 ICC) of myeloid neoplasms have been recently published. We reviewed the changes in the diagnosis distribution in patients with MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB) or AML using both classifications. Forty-seven patients previously diagnosed as having AML or MDS-EB with available mutation analysis data, including targeted next-generation and RNA-sequencing data, were included. We reclassified 15 (31.9%) and 27 (57.4%) patients based on the 2022 WHO and 2022 ICC, respectively. One patient was reclassified as having a translocation categorized as a rare recurring translocation in both classifications. Reclassification was mostly due to the addition of mutation-based diagnostic criteria (i.e., AML, myelodysplasia-related) or a new entity associated with TP53 mutation. In both classifications, MDS diagnosis required the confirmation of multi-hit TP53 alterations. Among 14 patients with TP53 mutations, 11 harbored multi-hit TP53 alterations, including four with TP53 mutations and loss of heterozygosity. Adverse prognosis was associated with multi-hit TP53 alterations (P=0.009) in patients with MDS-EB, emphasizing the importance of detecting the mutations at diagnosis. The implementation of these classifications may lead to the identification of different subtypes from previously heterogeneous diagnostic categories based on genetic characteristics.

Abstract

The fifth edition of the WHO classification (2022 WHO) and the International Consensus Classification (2022 ICC) of myeloid neoplasms have been recently published. We reviewed the changes in the diagnosis distribution in patients with MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB) or AML using both classifications. Forty-seven patients previously diagnosed as having AML or MDS-EB with available mutation analysis data, including targeted next-generation and RNA-sequencing data, were included. We reclassified 15 (31.9%) and 27 (57.4%) patients based on the 2022 WHO and 2022 ICC, respectively. One patient was reclassified as having a translocation categorized as a rare recurring translocation in both classifications. Reclassification was mostly due to the addition of mutation-based diagnostic criteria (i.e., AML, myelodysplasia-related) or a new entity associated with TP53 mutation. In both classifications, MDS diagnosis required the confirmation of multi-hit TP53 alterations. Among 14 patients with TP53 mutations, 11 harbored multi-hit TP53 alterations, including four with TP53 mutations and loss of heterozygosity. Adverse prognosis was associated with multi-hit TP53 alterations (P=0.009) in patients with MDS-EB, emphasizing the importance of detecting the mutations at diagnosis. The implementation of these classifications may lead to the identification of different subtypes from previously heterogeneous diagnostic categories based on genetic characteristics.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. Bernard E, "Molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes", NEJM Evid, 1, pp.EVIDoa2200008~ (2022)
  2. Döhner H, "Diagnosis and management of AML in adults : 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN", Blood, 140, pp.1345~1377 (2022)
  3. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, "Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia", N Engl J Med, 368, pp.2059~2074 (2013)
  4. Park Hee Sue, "Serial Analysis and Comparison of Mutation Profiles in Decitabine-treated Myeloid Sarcoma and Subsequent Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using Next-Generation Sequencing", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 42(5), pp.602~605 (2022), 대한진단검사의학회[DOI]
  5. Khoury JD, "The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours : myeloid and histiocytic", dendritic neoplasms, 2022, pp.36, 1703~1719
  6. Arber DA, "International Consensus Classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data", Blood, 140, pp.1200~1228 (2022)
  7. Arber DA, "The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia", Blood, 127, pp.2391~2405 (2016)
  8. McGowan-Jordan J, "ISCN 2020: An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature" (2020), Karger
  9. Dobin A, "STAR : ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner", Bioinformatics, 29, pp.15~21 (2013)
  10. ". (2018). ESMO Open, 3(Suppl 2), A179" (2022)[URL]
  11. (2017)[URL]
  12. Bolouri H, "The molecular landscape of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia reveals recurrent structural alterations and age-specific mutational interactions", Nat Med, 24, pp.103~112 (2018)
  13. Bernard E, "Implications of TP53 allelic state for genome stability, clinical presentation and outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes", Nat Med, 26, pp.1549~1556 (2020)
  14. Grob T, "Molecular characterization of mutant TP53 acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome", Blood, 139, pp.2347~2354 (2022)
  15. Haase D, "TP53 mutation status divides myelodysplastic syndromes with complex karyotypes into distinct prognostic subgroups", Leukemia, 33, pp.1747~1758 (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

Reclassification of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms According to the 2022 World Health Organization Classification and the 2022 International Consensus Classification Using Open-Source Data: Focus on SF3B1- and TP53 -mutated Myelodysplastic NeoplasmsKim Hye Ryoun, Yun Jiwon대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2025 · 제45권 제1호Reclassification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia According to the 2022 World Health Organization Classification and the International Consensus Classification Using Open-Source DataYun Jiwon대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2025 · 제45권 제2호TP53 Mutation Status in Myelodysplastic Neoplasm and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Impact of Reclassification Based on the 5th WHO and International Consensus Classification Criteria: A Korean Multicenter StudyBae Byunggyu, Chang Yoon Hwan, Choi Yu Jeong, Cho Young-Uk, Jang Seongsoo, Ji Eunhui, Kim Boram, Kim Hee-Jin, Kim Hyerim, Kim Hyerin, Kim Hyun Kyung, Kim Hyun-Young, Kim In-suk, Kim Miyoung, Kim Myungshin, Kim Yonggoo, Lee Ja Young, Lee Jee-Soo, Lee Jong-Mi, Shin Saeam, Yu Shinae대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2025 · 제45권 제2호골수이형성증후군과 급성골수성백혈병의 진단 및 재분류: 2016년 WHO 4판 분류법과 2022년 WHO 5판/ICC 분류법의 비교김현기, 박상혁, 이선호, 임지훈, 정윤성, Han Su Min대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2024 · 제14권 제3호What’s new in hematopathology 2025: myeloid neoplasms in the WHO 5th edition and ICCBarina Aqil대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2025 · 제59권 제6호Revised World Health Organization Criteria-Defined Acute Myeloid Leukemia in a Large Cohort: Highlighting the Frequency and Characterization of Recategorized Cases김시환, 박찬정, 서을주, 이민영, 장성수, 조영욱, 황상현대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2021 · 제11권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (18건)