본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Reclassification of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms According to the 2022 World Health Organization Classification and the 2022 International Consensus Classification Using Open-Source Data: Focus on SF3B1- and TP53 -mutated Myelodysplastic Neoplasms

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background: In 2022, the WHO and International Consensus Classification (ICC) published diagnostic criteria for myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDSs). We examined the influence of the revised diagnostic criteria on classifying MDSs in a large population. Methods: We retrieved an open-source pre-existing dataset from cBioPortal and included 2,454 patients with MDS in this study. Patients were reclassified based on the new diagnostic 2022 WHO and ICC criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression to validate the new criteria and to assess risk factors. Results: Based on the 2022 WHO criteria, 1.4% of patients were reclassified as having AML. The 2022 WHO criteria provide a superior prognostic/diagnostic model to the 2017 WHO criteria (Akaike information criterion, 14,152 vs. 14,516; concordance index, 0.705 vs. 0.681). For classifying MDS with low blast counts and SF3B1 mutation, a variant allele frequency cut-off of 5% (2022 WHO criteria) and the absence of RUNX1 co-mutation (2022 ICC criteria) are diagnostically relevant. For classifying MDSs with mutated TP53, a blast count cut-off of 10% (2022 ICC criteria) and multi-hit TP53 (2022 WHO criteria) are independent risk factors in cases with ≥ 10% blasts. Conclusions: Our findings support the refinements of the new WHO criteria. We recommend the complementary use of the new WHO and ICC criteria in classifying SF3B1- and TP53-mutated MDSs for better survival prediction.

Abstract

Background: In 2022, the WHO and International Consensus Classification (ICC) published diagnostic criteria for myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDSs). We examined the influence of the revised diagnostic criteria on classifying MDSs in a large population. Methods: We retrieved an open-source pre-existing dataset from cBioPortal and included 2,454 patients with MDS in this study. Patients were reclassified based on the new diagnostic 2022 WHO and ICC criteria. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression to validate the new criteria and to assess risk factors. Results: Based on the 2022 WHO criteria, 1.4% of patients were reclassified as having AML. The 2022 WHO criteria provide a superior prognostic/diagnostic model to the 2017 WHO criteria (Akaike information criterion, 14,152 vs. 14,516; concordance index, 0.705 vs. 0.681). For classifying MDS with low blast counts and SF3B1 mutation, a variant allele frequency cut-off of 5% (2022 WHO criteria) and the absence of RUNX1 co-mutation (2022 ICC criteria) are diagnostically relevant. For classifying MDSs with mutated TP53, a blast count cut-off of 10% (2022 ICC criteria) and multi-hit TP53 (2022 WHO criteria) are independent risk factors in cases with ≥ 10% blasts. Conclusions: Our findings support the refinements of the new WHO criteria. We recommend the complementary use of the new WHO and ICC criteria in classifying SF3B1- and TP53-mutated MDSs for better survival prediction.

관련 논문AI추천

Implications of the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification and International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasm in Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Excess Blasts and Acute Myeloid Leukemia윤정, 김하늬, 윤수영, 최철원, Jeon Min Ji, Kim Dae Sik, Kwon Jung Ah, Lee Cheonghwa, Yu Eun Sang대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2023 · 제43권 제5호Reclassification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia According to the 2022 World Health Organization Classification and the International Consensus Classification Using Open-Source DataYun Jiwon대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2025 · 제45권 제2호TP53 Mutation Status in Myelodysplastic Neoplasm and Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Impact of Reclassification Based on the 5th WHO and International Consensus Classification Criteria: A Korean Multicenter StudyBae Byunggyu, Chang Yoon Hwan, Choi Yu Jeong, Cho Young-Uk, Jang Seongsoo, Ji Eunhui, Kim Boram, Kim Hee-Jin, Kim Hyerim, Kim Hyerin, Kim Hyun Kyung, Kim Hyun-Young, Kim In-suk, Kim Miyoung, Kim Myungshin, Kim Yonggoo, Lee Ja Young, Lee Jee-Soo, Lee Jong-Mi, Shin Saeam, Yu Shinae대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2025 · 제45권 제2호골수이형성증후군과 급성골수성백혈병의 진단 및 재분류: 2016년 WHO 4판 분류법과 2022년 WHO 5판/ICC 분류법의 비교김현기, 박상혁, 이선호, 임지훈, 정윤성, Han Su Min대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2024 · 제14권 제3호Assessing the Relevance of Non-molecular Prognostic Systems for Myelodysplastic Syndrome in the Era of Next-Generation SequencingAgriello Evangelina, Andreoli Verónica, Arbelbide Jorge, Asinari Mariana, Basquiera Ana Lisa, Belli Carolina B, Bender Andrea, Castro María Belén, Catalán Ana I, Delamer Rocío, Grille Sofia, Lincango Marco, Navickas Alicia, Orgueira Adrián Mosquera, Osorio María José Mela, Rahhal Marilina, Rivello Hernán García대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2025 · 제45권 제1호유전자 검사 시대 골수형성이상증후군의 진단과 치료홍준식대한내과학회 · 대한내과학회지2024 · 제99권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)