본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Impact of Bicarbonate Interference on Routine Ion-Selective Electrode Chloride Measurements

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background: Chloride measurement is crucial for calculating the anion gap. Bicarbonate can interfere with chloride measurements; however, there is no information on the specific types of electrodes affected or the changes in bicarbonate non-selectivity over time. We evaluated the interference of bicarbonate on chloride measurements using different electrodes and the stability of this interference over time. Methods: The effect of bicarbonate on chloride measured with electrodes of various manufacturers was assessed. When non-selectivity toward bicarbonate was observed, the stability of this interference during the electrode’s lifetime was explored. The impact of the bicarbonate concentration on the calibrator was also evaluated. Results: Non-selectivity was observed for electrodes using quaternary ammonium salts (Beckman Coulter, Siemens, and Roche), with overestimated or underestimated chloride values observed at high or low bicarbonate concentrations, respectively. The degree of selectivity varied among electrodes. With the Roche electrode, interference became more pronounced over time, whereas the Siemens electrode appeared to gain selectivity during its lifetime. For the Roche system, adjusting the calibrator’s bicarbonate concentration from 30 mmol/L to 20–24 mmol/L reduced the number of samples with unacceptable bias (>3%) from 77.3% to 12.6%. Lot-to-lot variations in the calibrator bicarbonate concentration increased the uncertainty of chloride measurements. Conclusions: The extent of bicarbonate-induced error varied according to the type, manufacturer, and wear of the electrode; the bicarbonate concentration in the calibrators and the tested sample; and the chloride content. Laboratories should be aware of the impact of bicarbonate on routine chloride measurements to establish appropriate QC procedures.

Abstract

Background: Chloride measurement is crucial for calculating the anion gap. Bicarbonate can interfere with chloride measurements; however, there is no information on the specific types of electrodes affected or the changes in bicarbonate non-selectivity over time. We evaluated the interference of bicarbonate on chloride measurements using different electrodes and the stability of this interference over time. Methods: The effect of bicarbonate on chloride measured with electrodes of various manufacturers was assessed. When non-selectivity toward bicarbonate was observed, the stability of this interference during the electrode’s lifetime was explored. The impact of the bicarbonate concentration on the calibrator was also evaluated. Results: Non-selectivity was observed for electrodes using quaternary ammonium salts (Beckman Coulter, Siemens, and Roche), with overestimated or underestimated chloride values observed at high or low bicarbonate concentrations, respectively. The degree of selectivity varied among electrodes. With the Roche electrode, interference became more pronounced over time, whereas the Siemens electrode appeared to gain selectivity during its lifetime. For the Roche system, adjusting the calibrator’s bicarbonate concentration from 30 mmol/L to 20–24 mmol/L reduced the number of samples with unacceptable bias (>3%) from 77.3% to 12.6%. Lot-to-lot variations in the calibrator bicarbonate concentration increased the uncertainty of chloride measurements. Conclusions: The extent of bicarbonate-induced error varied according to the type, manufacturer, and wear of the electrode; the bicarbonate concentration in the calibrators and the tested sample; and the chloride content. Laboratories should be aware of the impact of bicarbonate on routine chloride measurements to establish appropriate QC procedures.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Schiemsky T, "Bicarbonate interference on cobas 6000 c501 chloride ion-selective electrodes", Clin Chem Lab Med, 56, pp.e214~e215 (2018)
  2. Dimeski G, "Bicarbonate interference with chloride-ion-selective electrodes", Clin Chem, 50, pp.1106~1107 (2004)
  3. Makiishi T, "Potential inaccuracies in chloride measurements in patients with severe metabolic acidosis", Int J Nephrol, 2012, pp.768316~ (2012)
  4. Bihari S, "Discrepancy in chloride measurement with decreasing bicarbonate concentrations", Clin Lab, 65, pp.1563~1565 (2019)
  5. Bakker E, "Encyclopedia of Analytical Science", pp.231~251 (2019), Elsevier
  6. Dimeski G, "Ion selective electrodes(ISEs)and interferences-A review", Clin Chim Acta, 411, pp.309~317 (2010)
  7. Ben Rayana MC, "Recommendation for measuring and reporting chloride by ISEs in undiluted serum, plasma or blood", Clin Chem Lab Med, 44, pp.346~352 (2006)
  8. Kraut JA, "Serum anion gap : its uses and limitations in clinical medicine", Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2, pp.162~174 (2007)
  9. Lenga Y, "Definitief jaar rapport chemie 2017", pp.87~ (2017), Sciensano
  10. Gao W, "Direct potentiometric sensing of anion concentration(not activity)", ACS Sens, 5, pp.313~318 (2020)
  11. Mikhelson KN, "Lecture Notes in Chemistry, volume 81" (2013), Springer Nature
  12. Bihari S, "Electrolyte measurement–myths and misunderstandings-Part II", J Crit Care, 60, pp.341~343 (2020)
  13. Wang T, "Variable selectivity of the Hitachi chemistry analyzer chloride ion-selective electrode toward interfering ions", Clin Biochem, 27, pp.37~14 (1994)
  14. Bakker E, "ChemInform Abstract: Carrier-based ion-selective electrodes and bulk optodes. Part 1. General characteristics", ChemInform, 29, pp.3083~3132 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

Sigma-Metrics of Electrolyte Tests From a Recently Launched New-Generation Proficiency Testing Program of the Korean Association of Quality Assurance for Clinical Laboratory박윤미, 박준석, 박해일, 서수연, 이상곤, 이승옥, 임춘화, 허희진대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2017 · 제37권 제4호검사전 오차를 최소화하여 재설정한 혈장 음이온차의 참고범위박일규, 백은정대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2005 · 제25권 제6호Performance Evaluation of the i-SmartCare 10 Analyzer and Method Comparison of Six Point-of-Care Blood Gas Analyzers박형두, Kim Sang-Mi대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2022 · 제42권 제4호Performance Evaluation of Cartridge-Type Blood Gas Analyzer: i-Smart 300김한아, 문희원, 윤여민, 이아람, 허미나대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2017 · 제7권 제1호Practical Considerations for Clinical Laboratories in Top-down Approach for Assessing the Measurement Uncertainty of Clinical Chemistry Analytes전사일, Gu Hyunjung, Hong Jinyoung, Lee Juhee, Lee Woochang, Lee Woo-In, Min Won-Ki, Yun Yeo-Min대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2022 · 제42권 제6호Periodic Comparability Verification and Within-Laboratory Harmonization of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Results at a Large Healthcare Center With Multiple InstrumentsJun Sun-Hee, Kim Sung Min, Lee Joon Hee, Lee Kyunghoon, Nam Youngwon, Song Junghan, Song Sang Hoon대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2022 · 제42권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)