Adjustment Formula for Harmonizing Triglyceride Values in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2022
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) triglyc- eride testing changed from the glycerol blanking method (2005–2021) to the glycerol non- blanking method (2022). We converted triglyceride data from 2005–2021 to that ob- tained since 2022 with different analytical methods. Methods: To develop a conversion equation, 98 fresh serum specimen pairs were com- pared using Passing–Bablok regression analysis. Implications of the conversion equation on epidemiological data were evaluated using KNHANES data from 2019–2021. Bias esti- mations determined using the Lipid Standardization Program (LSP) of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) enhanced the accuracy and comparabil- ity of the triglyceride results. Results: Triglyceride concentrations measured via the glycerol non-blanking method were 10.7 mg/dL (0.12 mmol/L, 10.0%) higher than those from the glycerol blanking method, with a 9.9 mg/dL (0.11 mmol/L, 5.0%) difference at a concentration of 200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L, N=98). The conversion equation y (glycerol non-blanking, 2022)=11.94+0.99x (glycerol blanking, 2005–2021) changed the mean triglyceride concentrations of the KNHANES 2019–2021 data (N=16,015) from 123.7 mg/dL (1.40 mmol/L, 95% confi- dence interval [CI]: 122.2–125.1 mg/dL [1.38–1.41 mmol/L]) to 134.3 mg/dL (1.52 mmol/L, 95% CI: 132.9–135.8 mg/dL [1.50–1.53 mmol/L]). Since 2022, bias monitoring using the CDC’s LSP has remained within a 5.0% limit. Conclusions: KNHANES triglyceride values in 2022 (non-blanking) were substantially higher than those from 2005–2021 (blanking). Conversion equations helped effectively adjust 2005–2021 data. Researchers should consider adjusting the KNHANES triglyceride data based on their study characteristics.
Abstract
Background: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) triglyc- eride testing changed from the glycerol blanking method (2005–2021) to the glycerol non- blanking method (2022). We converted triglyceride data from 2005–2021 to that ob- tained since 2022 with different analytical methods. Methods: To develop a conversion equation, 98 fresh serum specimen pairs were com- pared using Passing–Bablok regression analysis. Implications of the conversion equation on epidemiological data were evaluated using KNHANES data from 2019–2021. Bias esti- mations determined using the Lipid Standardization Program (LSP) of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) enhanced the accuracy and comparabil- ity of the triglyceride results. Results: Triglyceride concentrations measured via the glycerol non-blanking method were 10.7 mg/dL (0.12 mmol/L, 10.0%) higher than those from the glycerol blanking method, with a 9.9 mg/dL (0.11 mmol/L, 5.0%) difference at a concentration of 200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L, N=98). The conversion equation y (glycerol non-blanking, 2022)=11.94+0.99x (glycerol blanking, 2005–2021) changed the mean triglyceride concentrations of the KNHANES 2019–2021 data (N=16,015) from 123.7 mg/dL (1.40 mmol/L, 95% confi- dence interval [CI]: 122.2–125.1 mg/dL [1.38–1.41 mmol/L]) to 134.3 mg/dL (1.52 mmol/L, 95% CI: 132.9–135.8 mg/dL [1.50–1.53 mmol/L]). Since 2022, bias monitoring using the CDC’s LSP has remained within a 5.0% limit. Conclusions: KNHANES triglyceride values in 2022 (non-blanking) were substantially higher than those from 2005–2021 (blanking). Conversion equations helped effectively adjust 2005–2021 data. Researchers should consider adjusting the KNHANES triglyceride data based on their study characteristics.
