본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Adjustment Formula for Harmonizing Triglyceride Values in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2022

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류병리학

초록

Background: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) triglyc- eride testing changed from the glycerol blanking method (2005–2021) to the glycerol non- blanking method (2022). We converted triglyceride data from 2005–2021 to that ob- tained since 2022 with different analytical methods. Methods: To develop a conversion equation, 98 fresh serum specimen pairs were com- pared using Passing–Bablok regression analysis. Implications of the conversion equation on epidemiological data were evaluated using KNHANES data from 2019–2021. Bias esti- mations determined using the Lipid Standardization Program (LSP) of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) enhanced the accuracy and comparabil- ity of the triglyceride results. Results: Triglyceride concentrations measured via the glycerol non-blanking method were 10.7 mg/dL (0.12 mmol/L, 10.0%) higher than those from the glycerol blanking method, with a 9.9 mg/dL (0.11 mmol/L, 5.0%) difference at a concentration of 200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L, N=98). The conversion equation y (glycerol non-blanking, 2022)=11.94+0.99x (glycerol blanking, 2005–2021) changed the mean triglyceride concentrations of the KNHANES 2019–2021 data (N=16,015) from 123.7 mg/dL (1.40 mmol/L, 95% confi- dence interval [CI]: 122.2–125.1 mg/dL [1.38–1.41 mmol/L]) to 134.3 mg/dL (1.52 mmol/L, 95% CI: 132.9–135.8 mg/dL [1.50–1.53 mmol/L]). Since 2022, bias monitoring using the CDC’s LSP has remained within a 5.0% limit. Conclusions: KNHANES triglyceride values in 2022 (non-blanking) were substantially higher than those from 2005–2021 (blanking). Conversion equations helped effectively adjust 2005–2021 data. Researchers should consider adjusting the KNHANES triglyceride data based on their study characteristics.

Abstract

Background: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) triglyc- eride testing changed from the glycerol blanking method (2005–2021) to the glycerol non- blanking method (2022). We converted triglyceride data from 2005–2021 to that ob- tained since 2022 with different analytical methods. Methods: To develop a conversion equation, 98 fresh serum specimen pairs were com- pared using Passing–Bablok regression analysis. Implications of the conversion equation on epidemiological data were evaluated using KNHANES data from 2019–2021. Bias esti- mations determined using the Lipid Standardization Program (LSP) of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) enhanced the accuracy and comparabil- ity of the triglyceride results. Results: Triglyceride concentrations measured via the glycerol non-blanking method were 10.7 mg/dL (0.12 mmol/L, 10.0%) higher than those from the glycerol blanking method, with a 9.9 mg/dL (0.11 mmol/L, 5.0%) difference at a concentration of 200 mg/dL (2.26 mmol/L, N=98). The conversion equation y (glycerol non-blanking, 2022)=11.94+0.99x (glycerol blanking, 2005–2021) changed the mean triglyceride concentrations of the KNHANES 2019–2021 data (N=16,015) from 123.7 mg/dL (1.40 mmol/L, 95% confi- dence interval [CI]: 122.2–125.1 mg/dL [1.38–1.41 mmol/L]) to 134.3 mg/dL (1.52 mmol/L, 95% CI: 132.9–135.8 mg/dL [1.50–1.53 mmol/L]). Since 2022, bias monitoring using the CDC’s LSP has remained within a 5.0% limit. Conclusions: KNHANES triglyceride values in 2022 (non-blanking) were substantially higher than those from 2005–2021 (blanking). Conversion equations helped effectively adjust 2005–2021 data. Researchers should consider adjusting the KNHANES triglyceride data based on their study characteristics.

관련 논문AI추천

Calibration of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Values From the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data, 2008 to 2015김민진, 김용강, 김정호, 노선진, 박승만, 박태성, 송상훈, 송정한, 오경원, 윤여민, 지미숙대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2017 · 제37권 제1호Trends in Prevalence of Hypertriglyceridemia and Related Factors in Korean Adults: A Serial Cross-Sectional Study김경수, 박계영, 박철영, 한경도, 홍상모한국지질동맥경화학회 · 지질·동맥경화학회지2023 · 제12권 제2호Validation of the Friedewald formula for estimating low density lipoprotein cholesterol: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009 to 2011Haemin Jeong, Jongseok Lee, Ohk-Hyun Ryu, Sungok Jang대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2020 · 제35권 제1호Non-fasting triglyceride levels in the Korean population with and without ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease구보경, 문민경, 이서영대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2019 · 제34권 제2호Martin’s Equation as the Most Suitable Method for Estimation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in Korean Adults강미정, 기홍석, 김규남, 김종우, 윤준형, 이선영대한가정의학회 · Korean Journal of Family Medicine2017 · 제38권 제5호LDL-콜레스테롤의 추정: Friedewald 공식과 Martin 방법의 비교손희정, 이종석, 장성옥국가데이터연구원 · 통계연구2015 · 제20권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)