근대 건축물의 보존을 위한 역사적 가치와 건축적 가치에 관한 연구 -부산 워커하우스를 중심으로

Abstract

Walkerhouse is one of the of the Korean War, which left a great trace in modern Korean history, and we looked at what historical and architectural values this building has at this point. How will the value of these historical modern buildings be judged and understood. Old buildings are demolished or continue to prolong their lives depending on their performance or value. The measurement tool to judge this was found through previous studies, and the criteria were divided into historical and architectural values, and it was thought that an opportunity to gauge the continuity of the building’s existence was needed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of buildings in the past, which is viewed as a value standard for a complexly changing modern society. For the research method, theoretical establishment and measurement tools through previous studies were analyzed and cases studies had been conducted. By evaluating the Walkerhouse, the subject of research, along with similar modern buildings, I thought about whether this old modern building existed or not and expanded the scope of value judgment through these measurement tools. Walkerhouse, the direct subject of the study, was used as the UN Ground Forces Command at the time, but over the years, many questions have been raised about the value of its existence. In terms of architectural value, it is metaphorically revealed that the construction period was urgent and confusing with walls and Japanese roof structures built using miscellaneous stones that were easily available around the time. Due to its historical value, it is a symbol of the Cold War that should disappear depending on the viewer at this point, and on the other hand, it is a place where you can feel gratitude for the soldiers who participated in the war under the name of the United Nations for freedom and peace of the Republic of Korea. As a result, if it is determined to be preserved according to the evaluation items, what remains the question of which equation to use. This leads in various ways through research by follow-up researchers, and it is thought that it can play a commemorative and symbolic role as well as its original purpose.