본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정신질환자의 강제입원제도에 대한 문제점과 그 개선방안

The Problem and The Solution of Involuntary Admission of Mental Illness

2

조회

0

다운로드

21

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

In Korea, the number of involuntary admission of mental illness has increased. Especially, the cases that were conducted the admission by supervisors of mental patients take the biggest portion of the involuntary admission. The involuntary admission as the complementary measure against patient's will falls under the restriction of his/her personal liberty which limits or deprives his/her personal liberty. Anyone has right to enjoy the personal liberty and most countries including Korea have the system to protect the personal liberty. However, the personal liberty is not inviolable right that has unlimited protection. It can be limited in a certain situation. Most countries including Korea provide a personal detention system to protect the public safety and order under the regulation. In Korea, the Mental Health Act allows the supervisor to proceed the involuntary admission of the mental illness patient if the psychiatrist decides that the patient need to be hospitalized for the medical treatment and the society's necessity. Mayors, county headmen, and headmen of a ward may also order the admission of the patients. Moreover, in case of emergency, the suspected patient may be hospitalized with the approval of the psychiatrist and the police. According to the Mental Health Act, for the benefits of the patient and the protection of the public safty. there are positive effects that the patient can have efficient medical treatment and seek to come back to the society by quarantining the patients from the society. In the other hand, the involuntary admission may cause serious violation of the fundamental rights and human dignity which are protected by the Constitution. In particular, the violation of the patient's personal liberty may cause serious problem. Therefore, the appropriate procedure of quarantine is needed to prevent the violation of the personal liberty and the patient's rights. Furthermore, the after-plan of the violation should be prepared for the patients who are violated their personal liberty.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 미쉘 푸고, "정신병과, 심리학" (2007), 문학동네
  2. 정문용, "최신정신의학" (2007), 일조각
  3. 김문근, "정신보건법상 강제입원조항과 인권침해기제에 관한 질적사례연구", 사회복지연구, (33)
  4. 김병후, "각국 정신보건법에 있는 정신질환자 강제입원", 정신건강연구, 14, 한양대 정신건강연구소
  5. 김이영, "정신보건법의 문제점(I)", 정신건강연구, 10, 한양대 정신건강연구소
  6. 노용우, "정신질환자의 책임능력과 인신구속", 정신건강연구, 4, 한양대 정신건강연구소
  7. 서미경, "뉴질랜드 정부의 정신장애인 인권보호 정책에 관한 연구", 정신보건과 사회사업, 27
  8. 유기환, "정신보건법의 입법배경과 비자발적 입원에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 6, 전남대학교
  9. 정인원, "정신보건시설 재원자 및 시설 실태 조사", 2008 정신장애인 인권실태조사 결과 발표 및 토론회 자료집 (2008)
  10. 조성남, "범법 정신장애자의 형황 및 범죄율 분석", 신경정신의학, 31
  11. R. Marschner, "Kommeantar zur Freiheitsentziehung und Unterbringung, 4 Aufl. S. E. Carpinello, Kendra's Law: Final Report on the Status of Assisted Outpatient Treatment", Office of Mental Health, March 2005 WHO 2008, Policies and Practices for Mental Health in Europe, ~ (2005)
  12. G. Richardson, "Balancing Automy and Risk: A Failure of nerve in England and Wales?", International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30
  13. H. J. Salize, "Epidemiology of Involuntary Placement of Mentally Ill People across the Europe Union", British Joumal of Psychiatry, 184
  14. P. W. Williams, "New Development in Civil Comrnittment f The Mentally III: Impact for Patient, Familly, and Psychiatrist", JAMA, 242
  15. R. Wynn, "Coercion in Psychiatric Care: Clinical, Legal, Ethical Controversies", International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 10(4)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)