본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

우리나라 치료감호법의 문제점과 개선방안

The Problems and Improvements of Our Rehabilitative Custody System

0

조회

0

다운로드

19

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

A great attention has been drawn recently to the offences committed by mentally disordered offenders, which make many serious social problems and give rise to public criticism. Eventhough these offenders are deemed to have no responsibility for their behaviours proved as results from mental illness, we have demanded constantly efforts to protect our society from the possible danger posed by the mental disordered who are not legally punished. Nowadays, we should change out point of view regarding mentally disordered offenders from the objects of penal commitment to be treated and protected for the sake of human dignity. This study attempts to identify problems in this area and find measures of improvement concerning the psychiatric institutions in Korea through the interpretation of law and actual analysis. Especially, on Forensic assessment about the competence of the mental disordered, contains the materials on treatability and dangerousness that is firmly decision making by risk assessment and custody standards in America. The disciplines most associated with research on treatability and dangerousness are important factors to examine the competence of mentally disordered offenders to detain in rehabilitative treatment or transfer from prison to hospital and community based treatment. Despite the significant reform in rehabilitative treatment, there still remains several problems. So it is suggested that some proposals be advanced in this field. For example, the treatment department for mentally disordered offender and drug abusers and alcohol addicts should be separated. We will focus that much efforts are given to protect society from dangerousness as well as secure the rights of mentally disordered offenders. Ultimately, the most successful empirical efforts in this study will be those that do not simply determine which laws work, but which laws work best and why.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 이재상, "보안처분의 연구", ~ (1978)
  2. 김진환, "정신장애 범죄자의 책임과 처우에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2003
  3. 김진환, "전게논문", ~
  4. 김성돈, "형법총론" (2006), 현암사
  5. 정규원, "형법상 책임능력에 관한 연구-판단기준을 중심으로", 석사, pp.1997
  6. Dale E. McNiel, "전게논문", ~
  7. Lawrence S. Wrightsman et al, "전게서", ~
  8. Lawrence S. Wrightsman et al, "Forensic Assessment in Civil Cases", ~ (2002)
  9. John Monahan, "Mental disorder and violent behavior-perceptions and evidence, American Psychologist", ~ (1992)
  10. John Monahan, "전게논문", ~
  11. Dale E. McNiel, "전게서", ~
  12. Abraham S. Goldstein, "The Insanity defense", ~ (1967)
  13. 송문호, "형법상 치료감호에 대한 비판적 고찰", 형사정책, 12(1), pp.20~
  14. 송문호, "전게논문", ~
  15. Stephen. J. Morse, "전게논문", ~
  16. German, "Punishing the Not Guilty: Hospitalization of Persons Acquitted by Reason of Insanity", ~ (1976)
  17. Morris, "Dealing Responsiblity with the Criminally Irresponsible", ~ (1982)
  18. Note, "Rules for Exceptional Class: The Commitment and Release of Persons Acquitted of Violent Offenses by Reason of Insanity", ~ (1982)
  19. 김상호, "치료감호에 있어서의 위험성", 동아법학, (4), pp.59~
  20. 원범연, "범법정신장애자 등에 대한 법적 처우에 관한 연구", ~ (2003)
  21. 하태훈, "현행 보안처분제도의 문제점과 개선방안", 형사정책, (5), pp.101~104 (1990)
  22. 송문호, "형사법 연구", (13), pp.289~308

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)