본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on the Influencing Factors of the Intention to Use Products of Artificial Intelligence Translation

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Although artificial intelligence (AI) services are more accurate or more efficient than human services, consumers prefer human services to AI. Also, AI is somewhat mechanical and insensitive, it is largely due to consumers' stereotype that AI will be more difficult to understand than human experts about the unique needs of individuals. This is because AI is based on statistical analysis of big data in related with universality and average of groups rather than on individual uniqueness. This study decided to explore whether AI translation would be unfriendly if languages are unique. It also wanted to see how these effects interact with the uniqueness of individual consumers. If the uniqueness of the language negatively affects the preference of AI translation services, just as the uniqueness of the individual, this study will also consider why. Study 1 said consumers in the context of self-consumption preferred getting with human expert over AI in translation service compared to those of others. In light of the theory that one perceives uniqueness more than others, this result also reflects the expectation that experts will better understand individual uniqueness than AI. This logic was supported by a mediator test. In Study 2, consumers with a high tendency to pursue uniqueness preferred the touch of experts to AI in translation services. This trend was more pronounced in the case of unique language (Mongolian), than in the universal language (English). On the other hand, consumers with a low tendency to pursue uniqueness does not show these patterns. They preferred not only expert but also AI generally. In conclusion, this work proposes in various contexts that uniqueness can undermine AI acceptance. Perhaps the reason why AI spreads slower than expected is not because of technical problems, but humanistic anxiety such as impersonation and human alienation that individual uniqueness may be wiped out.

Abstract

Although artificial intelligence (AI) services are more accurate or more efficient than human services, consumers prefer human services to AI. Also, AI is somewhat mechanical and insensitive, it is largely due to consumers' stereotype that AI will be more difficult to understand than human experts about the unique needs of individuals. This is because AI is based on statistical analysis of big data in related with universality and average of groups rather than on individual uniqueness. This study decided to explore whether AI translation would be unfriendly if languages are unique. It also wanted to see how these effects interact with the uniqueness of individual consumers. If the uniqueness of the language negatively affects the preference of AI translation services, just as the uniqueness of the individual, this study will also consider why. Study 1 said consumers in the context of self-consumption preferred getting with human expert over AI in translation service compared to those of others. In light of the theory that one perceives uniqueness more than others, this result also reflects the expectation that experts will better understand individual uniqueness than AI. This logic was supported by a mediator test. In Study 2, consumers with a high tendency to pursue uniqueness preferred the touch of experts to AI in translation services. This trend was more pronounced in the case of unique language (Mongolian), than in the universal language (English). On the other hand, consumers with a low tendency to pursue uniqueness does not show these patterns. They preferred not only expert but also AI generally. In conclusion, this work proposes in various contexts that uniqueness can undermine AI acceptance. Perhaps the reason why AI spreads slower than expected is not because of technical problems, but humanistic anxiety such as impersonation and human alienation that individual uniqueness may be wiped out.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Baumeister, R. F., "The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation", Psychological Bulletin, 117, pp.497~529 (1995)
  2. Belk, R. W., "Possessions and the Extended Self", Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), pp.139~168 (1988)
  3. Berger, J., "Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains", Journal of Consumer Research, 34, pp.121~134 (2007)
  4. Chernev, A., "Competing for Consumer Identity : Limits to Self-Expression and the Perils of Lifestyle Branding", Journal of Marketing, 75(3), pp.66~82 (2011)
  5. 천세학, "전자상거래하에서의 유통회사와 제조회사간의 채널 협상력에 따른 가격전략에 관한 연구: 유통업자브랜드와 제조업체브랜드를 중심으로", 상품학연구, 28(6), pp.73~80 (2010), 한국상품학회[DOI]
  6. Dawes, R. M., "The Robust Beauty of Improper Linear Models in Decision Making", American Psychologist, 34(7), pp.571~582 (1979)
  7. DeWall, N. C., "Social Exclusion and Early-Stage Interpersonal Perception: Selective Attention to Signs of Acceptance", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, pp.729~741 (2009)
  8. Dietvorst, B. J., "Overcoming Algorithm Aversion : People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can(Even Slightly)Modify Them", Management Science, 64(3), pp.983~1476 (2016)
  9. Eisenberger, N. I., "Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social Exclusion", Science, 302, pp.290~292 (2003)
  10. Grove, W. M., "Comparative Efficiency of Informal (Subjective, Impressionistic) and Formal (Mechanical, Algorithmic) Prediction Procedures: The Clinical-Statistical Controversy", Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), pp.293~323 (1996)
  11. 하동규, "피드백 메시지가 대안선택에 미치는 영향", 상품학연구, 38(2), pp.127~134 (2020), 한국상품학회[DOI]
  12. Haslam, N., "Dehumanization : An Integrative Review", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), pp.252~264 (2006)
  13. He, D., "The Pleasure of Assessing and Expressing Our Likes and Dislikes", Journal of Consumer Research, 46, pp.545~563 (2019)
  14. Highhouse, S., "Stubborn Reliance on Intuition and Subjectivity in Employee Selection", Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(3), pp.333~342 (2008)
  15. Highhouse, S., "Stubborn Reliance on Intuition and Subjectivity in Employee Selection", Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(3), pp.333~342 (2008)
  16. Holbrook, M. B., "Patterns, Personalities and Complex Relationships in the Effects of Self on Mundane Everyday Consumption : These Are 495 of My Most and Least Favorite Things", NA–Advances in Consumer Research, 19, pp.417~423 (1992)
  17. Howard, J. A., "The Theory of Buyer Behavior" (1969), John Wiley & Sons
  18. Hoyer, W., "Consumer Behavior" (2016), South-Western, Cengage Learning
  19. 전표훈, "O2O 커머스의 지각된 서비스 품질이 고객만족도와 재이용의도에 미치는 영향: 불확실성 회피성향 조절효과를 중심으로", 유통경영학회지, 22(4), pp.203~214 (2019), 한국유통경영학회[DOI]
  20. Katz, D., "The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes", Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), pp.163~204 (1960)
  21. 김은혜, "이모티콘 이용에 대한 동조 욕구와 독특성 추구 욕구가 유료이모티콘 구매 의도에 미치는 영향: 한·중 간 문화 비교", 상품학연구, 38(1), pp.27~36 (2020), 한국상품학회[DOI]
  22. 김희진, "건강보조제의 색상이 소비자 태도에 미치는 영향: 메시지 프레이밍의 조절효과를 중심으로", 상품학연구, 35(4), pp.1~8 (2017), 한국상품학회[DOI]
  23. Kim, H. S., "‘Express Yourself’: Culture and the Effect of Self-Expression on Choice", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), pp.1~11 (2007)
  24. Kleinberg, J., "Human Decisions and Machine Predictions", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1), pp.237~293 (2018)
  25. 고승근, "편익 소구 유형과 자아해석 및 불공정성 인식이 공익 광고 태도 및 친사회적 행동 의도에 미치는 영향", 상품학연구, 36(6), pp.161~173 (2018), 한국상품학회[DOI]
  26. 고승근, "친환경 속성 중심성과 조절초점 및 메시지 프레이밍이 제품태도 및 구매의도에 미치는 영향", 상품학연구, 35(1), pp.13~26 (2017), 한국상품학회[DOI]
  27. 고서진, "화장품 광고의 소구 메시지에 따른 제품 태도: 소비자 실제 연령과 주관적 연령 차이의 조절 효과를 중심으로", 상품학연구, 35(5), pp.41~50 (2017), 한국상품학회[DOI]
  28. Kuncel, N. R., "Mechanical versus Clinical Data Combination in Selection and Admissions Decisions : A Meta-Analysis", Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), pp.1060~1072 (2013)
  29. Lambert, Z. V., "Consumer Alienation, General Dissatisfaction, and Consumerism Issue : Concept and Managerial Perspectives", Journal of Retailing, 56(2), pp.3~24 (1980)
  30. Lee, H. S., "The Effect of Consumer’s Technology Acceptance and Resistance on Intention to Use of Artificial Intelligence(AI)", Korean Management Review, 48(5), pp.1195~1219 (2017)
  31. 이한신, "소비자의 기술수용과 저항이 인공지능(AI) 사용의도에 미치는 영향", 경영학연구, 48(5), pp.1195~1219 (2019), 한국경영학회[DOI]
  32. 이희정, "사회적 관계 형성 및 새로움 추구 니즈 충족을 통한 소비자 행복도 제고 방안에 관한 연구: 오프라인 유통매장의 고객경험 프로그램 디자인을 위한 시사점을 중심으로", 유통경영학회지, 22(4), pp.173~184 (2019), 한국유통경영학회[DOI]
  33. 이진용, "자신과 타인의 가격과 품질 비교가 파워 수준에 따라 차별적으로 가격공정성에 미치는 영향", 상품학연구, 34(1), pp.1~15 (2016), 한국상품학회[DOI]
  34. Theory of Machine: When Do People Rely on Algorithms?, "Logg, J. M.", Harvard Business School, Harvard University, ~ (2018)
  35. Longoni, C., "Resistance to Medical Artificial Intelligence", Journal of Consumer Research, 46, pp.629~650 (2019)
  36. Maner, J. K., "Does Social Exclusion Motivate Interpersonal Reconnection? Resolving the ‘Porcupine Problem", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, pp.42~55 (2007)
  37. Maslach, C., "Individuation: Conceptual Analysis and Assessment", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, pp.729~738 (1985)
  38. Mead, N. L., "Social Exclusion Causes People to Spend and Consume Strategically in the Service of Affiliation", Journal of Consumer Research, 37, pp.902~919 (2011)
  39. Onkal, D., "The Relative Influence of Advice from Human Experts and Statistical Methods on Forecast Adjustments", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22(4), pp.390~409 (2009)
  40. Promberger, M., "Do Patients Trust Computers?", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(5), pp.455~468 (2006)
  41. Read, D., "Experienced Utility: Utility Theory from Jeremy Bentham to Daniel Kahneman", Thinking & Reasoning, 13(1), pp.45~61 (2007)
  42. 류미현, "계획행동이론과 개인의 심리적 변수에 따른 무인주문결제기기 이용의도에 관한 연구: 브랜드 태도의 조절효과 검증", 유통경영학회지, 22(4), pp.161~171 (2019), 한국유통경영학회[DOI]
  43. Sanders, N. R., "The Efficacy of Using Judgmental versus Quantitative Forecasting Methods in Practice", Omega : The International Journal of Management Science, 31(6), pp.511~522 (2003)
  44. Simonson, I., "The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making : Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons", Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), pp.49~68 (2000)
  45. Singelis, T. M., "The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, pp.580~591 (1994)
  46. Smith, E. R., "Attachment to Groups: Theory and Measurement", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, pp.94~110 (1999)
  47. Snyder, C. R., "Abnormality as a Positive Characteristic : The Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Need for Uniqueness", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), pp.518~527 (1977)
  48. Stanton, A. L., "Randomized, Controlled Trial of Written Emotional Expression and Benefit Finding in Breast Cancer Patients", Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(20), pp.4160~1468 (2002)
  49. Tamir, D. I., "Disclosing Information about the Self Is Intrinsically Rewarding", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(21), pp.8038~8043 (2012)
  50. Twenge, J. M., "Social Exclusion Decreases Prosocial Behavior", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, pp.55~66 (2007)
  51. Wan, E. W., "To Be or Not to Be Unique? The Effect of Social Exclusion on Consumer Choice", Journal of Consumer Research, 40, pp.1109~1122 (2014)
  52. Williams, K. D., "CyberOstracism: Effects of Being Ignored over the Internet", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, pp.748~762 (2000)
  53. Yeomans, M., "Making Sense of Recommendations", Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, pp.1~12 (2019)
  54. Zadro, L., "Ostracism: Empirical Studies Inspired by Real-World Experiences of Silence and Exclusion", pp.2004

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)