조선 중기 성리학자 申欽의 和蘇詩
A Korean neo-Confucianist Shin Heum’s(申欽) Responding Poems to Su Shi’s(和蘇詩)
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Su Shi(蘇軾, 1036~1101)was one of the most distinguished poets in the Northern Song(北宋) dynasty(960~1127), until now most of his poems are very influential, and he occupies important position in the history of Chinese literature. His poems were introduced into Koryo(高麗) during his lifetime. After that, his poems were widely read by the poets of Koryo and Chosun(朝鮮) dynasty(1392~1910). But in the middle period of the Chosun dynasty, admiration for Su Shi declined with the appearance of Korean neo-Confucianists. Following the neo-Confucianists of the Song dynasty, they criticized both Su Shi’s academic theory and his literary character, but I found Shin Heum(申欽), one of the most distinguished Korean neo-Confucianists, wrote some responding poems to Su Shi’s(和蘇詩). Shin Heum did not write much responding poems to Su Shi’s, but we can say the fact that he had written some responding poems to Su Shi’s in spite of being one of the most distinguished Korean neo-Confucianists is considerably meaningful, because other Korean neo-Confucianists of this period disliked Su Shi and his poems.
Abstract
Su Shi(蘇軾, 1036~1101)was one of the most distinguished poets in the Northern Song(北宋) dynasty(960~1127), until now most of his poems are very influential, and he occupies important position in the history of Chinese literature. His poems were introduced into Koryo(高麗) during his lifetime. After that, his poems were widely read by the poets of Koryo and Chosun(朝鮮) dynasty(1392~1910). But in the middle period of the Chosun dynasty, admiration for Su Shi declined with the appearance of Korean neo-Confucianists. Following the neo-Confucianists of the Song dynasty, they criticized both Su Shi’s academic theory and his literary character, but I found Shin Heum(申欽), one of the most distinguished Korean neo-Confucianists, wrote some responding poems to Su Shi’s(和蘇詩). Shin Heum did not write much responding poems to Su Shi’s, but we can say the fact that he had written some responding poems to Su Shi’s in spite of being one of the most distinguished Korean neo-Confucianists is considerably meaningful, because other Korean neo-Confucianists of this period disliked Su Shi and his poems.
참고문헌 (23)
- 조규백, "조선조 문인의 蘇東坡詩 수용과 평가", 대동문화연구, (91), pp.153~182 (2015), 대동문화연구원
- 조규백, "‘고려, 조선조에서의 소동파 수용’에 관한 연구개황 - 1964~2015년 기간을 중심으로 -", 중국학보, (73), pp.231~256 (2015), 한국중국학회
- 崔笠, "≪簡易集≫(韓國文集叢刊本)", ~
- 정숙인, "象村 申欽의 <和陶詩> 중 <飮酒> 20首 연구 - 陶淵明의 <飮酒>, 蘇軾의 <和陶飮酒詩>와의 비교문학적 관점에서 -", 우리문학연구, (35), pp.91~119 (2012), 우리문학회
- 강경희, "조선후기 崇蘇熱과 東坡笠屐圖", 중국어문학논집, (65), pp.415~431 (2010), 중국어문학연구회
- 김보경, "韓國 ‘和陶詩’ 硏究 序說", 중국문학, 66, pp.219~243 (2011), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 김주백, "象村 申欽의 和陶詩 연구", 한문학논집, 10 (1992)
- 金暎春, "李奎報研究", 碩士, pp.1981
- 류종목, "팔방미인 소동파" (2005), 신서원
- 柳素眞, "蘇軾對高麗及朝鮮漢文詩壇的影響硏究", 博士, pp.2013
- 류소진, "韓國古代文人的「和蘇詩", 중국어문학, (63), pp.79~108 (2013), 영남중국어문학회[DOI]
- 陸游, "≪渭南文集≫(文淵閣四庫全書本)", ~
- 민족문화추진회, "상촌 신흠의 문학세계" (1997), 民族文化推進會
- 박해남, "상촌 신흠 문학의 궤적과 의미" (2012), 보고사
- 申欽, "≪象村稿≫(韓國文集叢刊本)", ~
- 심경호, "한국 한시의 이해" (2000), 태학사
- 蘇軾著, "정본완역 蘇東坡詩集1-2" (2012), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 蘇軾著, "蘇軾詩集" (1987), 中華書局
- 蘇轍, "欒城集" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
- 왕수이자오, "소동파평전―중국의 문호 소식의 삶과문학" (2013), 돌베개
- 王水照, "蘇軾研究" (1999), 河南教育出版社
- 袁行霈, "論和陶詩及文化意蘊", 中國社會科學, 6 (2003)
- 趙翼, "≪甌北詩話≫(清嘉慶湛貽堂刻本)", ~
