본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

重譯에 대한 고찰 -錢鐘書 圍城 을 중심으로-

Discussion of indirect translation : based on the study of translation of the novel 'The Besieged Fortress' of Qian Zhong Shu

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The famous novel ≪Besieged Fortress≫ written by the great Chinese author Qian Zhong Shu has been published twice in the Korea Republic during the 1990s. The first Korean translation of this masterpiece is actually an indirect translation via its English version. The second Korean translation is a direct translation based on the original novel written in Chinese. Influenced by the English version instead of the original version, some parts of the first Korean version appear vague and rigid as it was unable to be expressed in corresponding appropriate Korean Chinese characters. However, translating this way has its own advantage compared to direct translation. As this would lead to free translation instead of literal translation, therefore it took away the interference from those Korean Chinese characters, as a result it used more authentic Korean words to make the story more vivid, and has a significant good effect in describing the era and the society then, in which the characters of the novel had lived. Thus it also helps readers to understand the novel better. That is why this indirect version is regarded by many translators as an important reference book. Furthermore, it promotes Korean language and its culture, which of course is a desire for all translators from Korea. As a translator, you always want to do your best to produce the highest quality work and hope it will be liked by your readers. Because of that, your translation style has to be catered to the taste of your readers. This study shows that no matter whether it is a direct translation or an indirect translation, provided it helps producing a good translation work, being a translator you need to learn to apply either method or both into your translation to suit your readers.

Abstract

The famous novel ≪Besieged Fortress≫ written by the great Chinese author Qian Zhong Shu has been published twice in the Korea Republic during the 1990s. The first Korean translation of this masterpiece is actually an indirect translation via its English version. The second Korean translation is a direct translation based on the original novel written in Chinese. Influenced by the English version instead of the original version, some parts of the first Korean version appear vague and rigid as it was unable to be expressed in corresponding appropriate Korean Chinese characters. However, translating this way has its own advantage compared to direct translation. As this would lead to free translation instead of literal translation, therefore it took away the interference from those Korean Chinese characters, as a result it used more authentic Korean words to make the story more vivid, and has a significant good effect in describing the era and the society then, in which the characters of the novel had lived. Thus it also helps readers to understand the novel better. That is why this indirect version is regarded by many translators as an important reference book. Furthermore, it promotes Korean language and its culture, which of course is a desire for all translators from Korea. As a translator, you always want to do your best to produce the highest quality work and hope it will be liked by your readers. Because of that, your translation style has to be catered to the taste of your readers. This study shows that no matter whether it is a direct translation or an indirect translation, provided it helps producing a good translation work, being a translator you need to learn to apply either method or both into your translation to suit your readers.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 陳福康, "中國譯學理論史稿" (2002), 上海外語敎育出版社
  2. 조재룡, "중역(重譯)의 인식론 그 모든 중역들의 중역과 근대 한국어", 아세아연구, 54(3), pp.9~42 (2011), 아세아문제연구소
  3. 계용묵, "작품의 번역과 역자 문제", 경향신문, ~ (1954)
  4. 황현산, "번역에 깔린 패배주의", 출판저널 193권, ~ (1996)
  5. 정내동, "문단숙청과 외국문학수입의 필요(삼)", 동아일보, ~ (1935)
  6. 김안서, "언어의순수를위하여", 동아일보, ~ (1931)
  7. 김병철, "한국현대번역문학사연구 상" (1998), 을유문화사
  8. 김재현, "철학원전 번역을 통해 본 우리의 근현대", 시대와 철학, 15(2), pp.305~331 (2004), 한국철학사상연구회
  9. 김소운, "번역문화와 오역", 세대, 6 (1968)
  10. 孔慧怡, "亞洲飜譯傳統與現代動向" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  11. 이가형, "한국 번역문학의 현단계", 매일경제, ~ (1982)
  12. 이상정, "韓·中 漢字語의 意味 및 飜譯에 대한 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2012
  13. 廖七一, "中國近代翻譯思想的嬗變" (2010), 南開大學出版社
  14. 임순정, "재번역본에 나타난 동질성과 이질성 ‘적과 흑’을 중심으로", 통번역교육연구, 6(1), pp.155~178 (2008), 한국통번역교육학회
  15. 劉桂蘭, "論重譯的世俗化" (2015), 武漢大學出版社
  16. 魯迅, "论重译", 申報, ~ (1934)
  17. 문용, "번역과 번역문화", 국어생활 (1990)
  18. 朴相益, "우리 인문학과 번역", 역사학보, 174, pp.359~375 (2002), 역사학회
  19. 박영록, "韓中飜譯과 글쓰기", 중국학논총, (7) (1998)
  20. 책으로 따뜻한 세상 만드는 교사들, "독서교육 길라잡이" (2001), 푸른숲

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)